Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke

Stroke

Volumn 37, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 2348-2353

  Kwakkel, Gert ^a,c   Kollen, Boudewijn ^b   Twisk, Jos ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Research Bureau   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Prognosis; Recovery of function; Regression analysis; Spontaneous remission

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BARTHEL INDEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY; MOBILIZATION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARM; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; HUMANS; LEG; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TIME FACTORS; WALKING;

EID: 33748352751     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000238594.91938.1e     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Dobkin BH. Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2005;21:352:1677-1684.
2. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22:281-299.
3. Newman M. The process of recovery after hemiplegia. Stroke. 1972;3:702-710.
4. Gresham GE. Stroke outcome research. Stroke. 1986;17:358-362.
5. Skilbeck CE, Wade DT, Hewer RL, Wood VA. Recovery after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983;46:5-8.
6. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, Divine GW, Feussner J. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke. 1992;23:1084-1089.
7. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Horner RD, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke. 1994;25:1181-1188.
8. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:2181-2186.
9. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen TS. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:406-412.
10. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354:191-196.
11. Kollen B, van de Port I, Lindeman E, Twisk J, Kwakkel G. Predicting improvement in gait after stroke. A longitudinal prospective study. Stroke. 2005;36:2676-2680.
12. Collen FM, Wade DT, Bradshaw CM. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Stud. 1990;12:6-9.
13. Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther. 1983;63:1607-1610.
14. Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther. 1984;64:35-40.
15. Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4:483-492.
16. van der Lee JH, Roorda LD, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. Improving the Action Research Arm test: a unidimensional hierarchical scale. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:646-653.
17. Bamford J. Clinical examination in diagnosis and subclassification of stroke. Lancet. 1992;339:400-402.
18. Goldstein H, Browne W, Rasbash J. Multilevel modelling of medical data. Stat Med. 2002;21:3291-3315.
19. Twisk JWR. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis for Epidemiology. Cambridge University Press; 2003.
20. Duncan PW, Lai SM, Keighley J. Defining post-stroke recovery: implications for design and interpretation of drug trials. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39:835-841.