Acceptability of the H1N1 Vaccine Among Older Adults: The Interplay of Message Framing and Perceived Vaccine Safety and Efficacy

Health Communication

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 559-568

  Nan, Xiaoli ^a   Xie, Bo ^a   Madden, Kelly ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS VACCINE;

AGED; ARTICLE; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INFLUENZA VIRUS A H1N1; MALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED STATES;

AGED; AIDS VACCINES; FEMALE; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; INFLUENZA A VIRUS, H1N1 SUBTYPE; MALE; MARYLAND; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84861504346     PISSN: 10410236     EISSN: 15327027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2011.617243     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abhyankar, P., O'Connor, D. B. and Lawton, R. 2008. The role of message framing in promoting MMR vaccination: Evidence of a loss-frame advantage. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 13: 1-16.
2. Aiken, L. S. and West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Ball, L. K., Evans, G. and Bostrom, A. 1998. Risky business: Challenges in vaccine risk communication. Pediatrics, 101: 453-458.
4. Banks, S. M., Salovey, P., Greener, S., Rothman, A. J., Moyer, A., Beauvais, J. and Epel, E. 1995. The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psychology, 14: 178-178.
5. Bartels, R. D., Elo, L. and Rothman, A. J. May 2004. An analysis of how construal of inoculation interacts with message-based framing appeals, May, Chicago, IL: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society.
6. Bartels, R. D., Kelly, K. M. and Rothman, A. J. 2010. Moving beyond the function of the health behaviour: The effect of message frame on behavioural decision-making. Psychology and Health, 25: 821-838.
7. Block, L. G. and Keller, P. A. 1995. When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 32: 192-203.
8. Brabin, L., Roberts, S. A., Farzaneh, F. and Kitchener, H. C. 2006. Future acceptance of adolescent human papillomavirus vaccination: A survey of parental attitudes. Vaccine, 24: 3087-3094.
9. Brody, D. S. 1980. The patient's role in clinical decision-making. Annals of Internal Medicine, 93: 718-722.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010a). Updated CDC estimates of 2009 H1N1 influenza cases, hospitalizations and deaths in the United States, April 2009-April 10, 2010. http://flu.gov/individualfamily/about/h1n1/estimates_2009_h1n1.html#The%20Numbers (http://flu.gov/individualfamily/about/h1n1/estimates_2009_h1n1.html#The%20Numbers)
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010b). Final estimates for 2009-10 seasonal influenza and influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccination coverage-United States, August 2009 through May, 2010. http://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/vaccination/coverage_0910estimates.htm (http://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/vaccination/coverage_0910estimates.htm)
12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010c). 2009 H1N1 flu. http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu (http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu)
13. Cox, D. and Cox, A. D. 2001. Communicating the consequences of early detection: The role of evidence and framing. Journal of Marketing, 65: 91-103.
14. Ferguson, E. and Gallagher, L. 2007. Message framing with respect to decisions about vaccination: The roles of frame valence, frame method and perceived risk. British Journal of Psychology, 98: 667-680.
15. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16. Freed, G. L., Clark, S. J., Butchart, A. T., Singer, D. C. and Davis, M. M. 2010. Parental vaccine safety concerns in 2009. Pediatrics, 125: 654-659.
17. Gerend, M. A. and Shepherd, J. E. 2007. Using message framing to promote acceptance of the human papillomavirus vaccine. Health Psychology, 26: 745-752.
18. Gerend, M. A., Shepherd, J. E. and Monday, K. A. 2008. Behavioral frequency moderates the effects of message framing on HPV vaccine acceptability. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35: 221-229.
19. Hayes, A. F. and Matthes, J. 2009. Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41: 924-936.
20. Higgins, E. T. 1997. Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52: 1280-1300.
21. Higgins, E. T. 2002. How self-regulation creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12: 177-191.
22. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47: 263-291.
23. Makoul, G. 1998. Perpetuating passivity: Reliance and reciprocal determinism in physician patient interaction. Journal of Health Communication, 3: 233-259.
24. Meyerowitz, B. E. and Chaiken, S. 1987. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52: 500-510.
25. Nan, X. in press. Communicating to young adults about the human papillomavirus: Consideration of message framing, motivation, and gender, Health Communication.
26. O'Keefe, D. J. and Jensen, J. D. 2006. "The advantages of compliance or the disadvantages of noncompliance? A meta-analytic review of the relative persuasive effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages". In Communication yearbook, 30, Edited by: Beck, C. S. 1-43. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. O'Keefe, D. J. and Jensen, J. D. 2007. The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12: 623-644.
28. O'Keefe, D. J. and Jensen, J. D. 2009. The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 59: 296-316.
29. O'Keefe, D. J. 2011. "Generalizing about the persuasive effects of message variations: The case of gain-framed and loss-framed appeals". In Bending opinion: Essays on persuasion in the public domain, Edited by: van Haaften, T., Jansen, H., de Jong, J. and Koetsenruijter, W. 117-131. Leiden, The Netherlands: Leiden University Press.
30. O'Keefe, D. J. in press. "From psychological theory to message design: Lessons from the story of gain-framed and loss-framed persuasive appeals". In Health communication message design: Theory, research, and practice, Edited by: Cho, H. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Population Resource Center. (2011). The aging of America: Key facts & trends. http://www.prcdc.org/300million/The_Aging_of_America (http://www.prcdc.org/300million/The_Aging_of_America)
32. Rogers, R. W. 1983. "Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation". In Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook, Edited by: Cacioppo, J. T. and Petty, R. E. 153-176. New York: Guilford.
33. Rosenstock, I. M. 1974. Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Education Monographs, 2: 1-8.
34. Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J. and Salovey, P. 2006. The strategic use of gain-and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56: 202-220.
35. Rothman, A. J., Martino, S. C., Bedell, B. T., Detweiler, J. B. and Salovey, P. 1999. The systematic influence of gain- and loss-framed messages on interest in and use of different types of health behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25: 1355-1369.
36. Rothman, A. J. and Salovey, P. 1997. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121: 3-19.
37. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211: 453-458.
38. Taylor, S. 1991. Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110: 67-85.
39. Van't Riet, J., Ruiter, R. A. C., Werrij, M. Q. and De Vries, H. 2008. The influence of self-efficacy on the effects of framed health messages. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38: 800-809.
40. Van't Riet, J., Ruiter, R. A. C., Werrij, M. Q. and De Vries, H. 2010. Self-efficacy moderates message-framing effects: The case of skin cancer detection. Psychology and Health, 25: 339-349.
41. Van't Riet, J., Ruiter, R.A.C., Smerecnik, C. and De Vries, H. 2010. Examining the influence of self-efficacy on message-framing effects: Reducing salt consumption in the general population. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32: 165-172.
42. Witte, K. 1992. Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59: 329-349.
43. Witte, K. 1994. Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs, 61: 113-134.
44. Witte, K., Meyer, G. and Martell, D. 2001. Effective health risk messages, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Xie, B. 2009. Older adults' health information wants in the Internet age: Implications for patient-provider relationships. Journal of Health Communication, 14: 510-524.