Alveolar bone stress around implants with different abutment angulation: An FE-Analysis of anterior maxilla

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 196-201

  Sadrimanesh, Roozbeh ^a   Siadat, Hakimeh ^b   Sadr Eshkevari, Pooyan ^c   Monzavi, Abbas ^b   Maurer, Peter ^b   Rashad, Ashkan ^b  

^a Private Practice   (Iran)

^b TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c Farzan Clinical Research Institute   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTAL PROCEDURE; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; JAW; MASTICATION; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; BIOMECHANICS; BITE FORCE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MAXILLA; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 84861455238     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31824c302e     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Romeo E, Chiapasco M, Ghisolfi M, et al. Long-term clinical effectiveness of oral implants in the treatment of partial edentulism. Seven-year life table analysis of a prospective study with ITI dental implants system used for single-tooth restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13: 133-143. (Pubitemid 41699829)
2. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, et al. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: A clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003;23: 313-323. (Pubitemid 37162313)
3. John V, de Poi R, Blanchard S. Socket preservation as a precursor of future implant placement: Review of the literature and case reports. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2007;28: 646-653.
4. Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22: 49-70.
5. McAllister BS, Haghighat K. Bone augmentation techniques. J Periodontol. 2007;78: 377-396.
6. De Rouck T, Collys K, Cosyn J. Single- tooth replacement in the anterior maxilla by means of immediate implantation and provisionalization: A review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23: 897-904.
7. Quirynen M, van Assche N, Botticelli D, et al. How does the timing of implant placement to extraction affect outcome? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22: 203-223.
8. Siebert JS. Reconstruction of deformed, partially edentulous ridge, using full thickness onlay grafts. Part I. Technique and wound healing. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1983;4: 437-453.
9. Bidez MW, Misch CE. Force transfer in implant dentistry: Basic concepts and principles. J Oral Implantol. 1992;18: 264-274.
10. Papavasiliou G, Kamposira P, Bayne SC, et al. Three dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support prosthesis type and loading during function. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 76: 633-640. (Pubitemid 126655236)
11. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17: 136-159. (Pubitemid 44327705)
12. Donos N, Mardas N, Chadha V. Clinical outcomes of implants following lateral bone augmentation: Systematic assessment of available options (barrier membranes, bone grafts, split osteotomy). J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35: 173-202.
13. Ridell A, Grondahl K, Sennerby L. Placement of Branemark implants in the maxillary tuber region: Anatomical considerations, surgical technique and long-term results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20: 94-98.
14. Aparicio C, Perales P, Rangert B. Tilted implants as an alternative to maxillary sinus grafting: A clinical, radiologic, and Periotest study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2001;3: 39-49.
15. Francetti L, Agliardi E, Testori T, et al. Immediate rehabilitation of the mandible with fixed full prosthesis supported by axial and tilted implants: Interim results of a single cohort prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008;10: 255-263.
16. Sethi A, Kaus T, Sochor P, et al. Evolution of the concept of angled abutments in implant dentistry: 14-year clinical data. Implant Dent. 2002;11: 4151.
17. Balshi TJ, Ekfeldt A, Stenberg T, et al. Three-year evaluation of Branemark implants connected to angled abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12: 52-58. (Pubitemid 127500372)
18. Kallus T, Henry P, Jemt T, et al. Clinical evaluation of angled abutments for the Branemark system: A pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5: 39-45.
19. Kao HC, Gung YW, Chung TF, et al. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implant: A 3-D finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23: 623-630.
20. Clelland NL, Gilat A. The effect of abutment angulation on stress transfer for an implant. J Prosthodont. 1992;1: 24-28.
21. Clelland NL, Gilat AEA, McGlumphy EA, et al. A photoelastic and strain gauge analysis of angled abutments for an implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8: 541-548.
22. Clelland NL, Lee JK, Bimbenet OC, et al. A three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of angled abutments for an implant placed in the anterior maxilla. J Prosthodont. 1995;4: 95-100.
23. Saab XE, Griggs JA, Powers JM, et al. Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: A finite element study. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97: 85-92.
24. Li J, Wang HL. Common implantrelated advanced bone grafting complications: Classification, etiology, and management. Implant Dent. 2008;17: 389-401.
25. Frost HM. Presence of microscopic cracks in vivo in bone. Bulletin of Henry Ford Hospital. 1960;8: 25-35.
26. Burr DB, Martin RB, Schaffler MB, et al. Bone remodeling in response to in vivo fatigue microdamage. J Biomech. 1985;18: 189-200. (Pubitemid 15112335)
27. Huiskes R, Weinans H, Grootenboer HJ, et al. Adaptive boneremodeling theory applied to prostheticdesign analysis. J Biomech. 1987;20: 1135-1150. (Pubitemid 18010111)
28. Hassler CR, Rybicki EF, Cummings KD, et al. Quantification of bone stresses during remodeling. J Biomech. 1980;13: 185-190. (Pubitemid 10176475)
29. Dalkiz M, Zor M, Aykul H, et al. The three-dimensional finite element analysis of fixed bridge restoration supported by the combination of teeth and osseointegrated implants. Implant Dent. 2002;11: 293-300.
30. Schrotenboer J, Tsao YP, Kinariwala V, et al. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: Afinite element analysis. Implant Dent. 2009; 18: 260-269.
31. Bayraktar HH, Morgana EF, Nieburb GL, et al. Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. J Biomech. 2004;37: 27-35. (Pubitemid 37532626)
32. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, ed. Tissue Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago, IL: Quintessence; 1985: 199-209.
33. Schaeffer A. Behavior of the axis of human incisor teeth during growth. Angle Orthod. 1949;19: 254-275.
34. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, et al. Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31: 18-22. (Pubitemid 38253141)
35. Li J, Li H, Shi L, et al. A mathematical model for simulating the bone remodeling process under mechanical stimulus. Dent Mater. 2007;23: 1073-1078. (Pubitemid 47088697)
36. Kerner J, Huiskes R, van Lenthe GH, et al. Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and postoperative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodeling. J Biomech. 1999;32: 695-703. (Pubitemid 29322089)
37. Eger DE, Gunsolley JC, Feldman S. Comparison of angled and standard abutments and their effect on clinical outcomes: A preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15: 819-823.
38. Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M. "Allon- Four" immediate-function concept with Branemark System implants for completely edentulous mandibles: A retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5: 2-9. (Pubitemid 43020654)
39. Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M. Allon- 4 immediate-function concept with Branemark System implants for completely edentulous maxillae: A 1-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7: 88-94.
40. Capelli M, Zuffetti F, del Fabbro M, et al. Immediate rehabilitation of the ompletely edentulous jaw with fixed prostheses supported by either upright or tilted implants: A multicenter clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22: 639-644.
41. Duarte LR, Filho HN, Francischone CE, et al. The establishment of a protocol for the total rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae employing four zygomatic fixtures in an immediate loading system-A 30-month clinical and radiographic follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007;9: 186-196.
42. Katz JL. Mechanics of hard tissue. In: Brozino JD, ed. The Biomedical Engineering Handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1995: 273-289.
43. Currey J. The Mechanical Adaptations of Bone. New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1984.
44. O'Mahony AM, Williams JL, Spencer P. Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible increase peri-implant stress and strain under oblique loading. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12: 648-657. (Pubitemid 33721293)