Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: A finite element analysis

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 260-269

  Wang, Hom Lay ^a   Schrotenboer, Jason ^c   Tsao, Yi Pin ^a   Kinariwala, Vipul ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b Business Development Cranes Software Inc   (United States)

^c School of Dentistry ^*

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Implant abutment; Implants; Numerical analysis; Platform switching

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; JAW; MANDIBLE; MASTICATION; METHODOLOGY; OSTEOLYSIS; PHYSIOLOGY; SHEAR STRENGTH; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; BITE FORCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SHEAR STRENGTH;

EID: 68049137788     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31819e8c1d     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockier B, et al. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10: 387-416.
2. Lekholm U, Adell R, Lindhe J, et al. Marginal tissue reactions at osseointe-grated titanium fixtures (I). A 3-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;15:39-52.
3. Jemt T, Lekholm U, Grondahl K. 3-year follow-up study of early single implant restorations ad modum Branemark. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1990; 10:340-349.
4. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1990;1:33-40.
5. Oh TJ, Yoon J, Misch CE, et al. The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science? J Periodontol. 2002;73:322-333.
6. Albrektsson T, Zarb G. The long term efficiency of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1:11-25.
7. Misch CE. Dental Evaluation: Factors of Stress. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999:122-123.
8. Jung YC, Han CH, Lee KW. A 1-year radiographic evaluation of marginal bone around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:811-818.
9. Guo E. Mechanical Properties of Cortical Bone and Cancellous Bone Tissue. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC-Taylor & Francis; 2001:1-23.
10. Rangert E, Krogh PJ, Langer B, et al. Bending overload and implant fracture: A retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10:326-334.
11. Natali AN, Pavan PG, Ruggero AL. Analysis of bone - Implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:67-74.
12. Hayes WC. Biomechanics of Cortical and Trabecular Bone: Implication for Assessment of Fracture Risk. New York: Reven Press; 1991:130-144.
13. Pilliar RM, Desporter DA, Watson PA, et al. Dental implant design - Effect on bone remodeling. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25:467-483.
14. Vaillancourt H, Pillar RM, McCam-mond D. Factors affecting crestal bone loss with dental implants partially covered with a porous coating: A finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:351-359.
15. Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature. J Pros-thet Dent. 2001;85:585-598.
16. O'Mahony A, Williams J, Spencer P. Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and can-cellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri-implant stress and strain under oblique loading. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:648-657.
17. Sakaguichi RL, Borgersen SE. Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10:295-302.
18. Borchers L, Reichart P. Three-dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development. J Dent Res. 1983;61:25-29.
19. Rice JC, Cowin SC, Bowman JA. On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. J Biomech. 1998;21:155-166.
20. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection. In: Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Os-seointegration in Clinical. 1st ed. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985:117-128.
21. Kelly JR, Campbell SD, Bowen HK. Fracture surface analysis of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62:536-541.
22. Homgren EP, Seckinger RJ, Kilgren LM, et al. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis - A two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J Oral Implantol. 1998;24:80-88.
23. Akagawa A, Sato Y, Teixeira ER, et al. A mimic osseointegrated implant model for three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:41-45.
24. Habgerg C. Assessments of bite force: A review. J Craniomandib Disord Facial Oral Pain. 1987;1:162-169.
25. Petrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: Influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:486-489.
26. Vaillancourt H, Pilliar RM, McCam-mond D. Finite element analysis of crestal bone loss around porous-coated dental implants. J Appl Biomater. 1995;6:267-282.
27. Duyck J, Vandamme K, Geris L, et al. The influence of micro-motion on the tissue differentiation around immediately loaded cylindrical turned titanium implants. Arch Oral Biol. 2006;51:1-9.