Comparison of Angled and Standard Abutments and Their Effect on Clinical Outcomes: A Preliminary Report

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 819-823

  Eger, Dorothy E ^a   Gunsolley, John C ^a   Feldman, Sylvan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND DENTAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Dental implant abutments; Endosseous dental implantation; Implant alignment

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GINGIVA; GINGIVITIS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIODONTICS; PERIODONTITIS; SMOKING; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GINGIVA; GINGIVITIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIODONTAL INDEX; PERIODONTAL POCKET; SMOKING; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0034327339     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Buser D, Belser UC. Anatomic, surgical, and esthetic considerations in implant dentistry. In: Buser D, Dahlin C, Schenk RK (eds). Guided Bone Regeneration in Implant Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1994:13-29.
2. Misch C. Prosthodontic considerations. In: Misch C (ed). Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St Louis: Mosby, 1993: 187-200.
3. Summers RB. The osteotome technique: Part 3 - Less invasive methods of elevating the sinus floor. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1994;15:698-708.
4. Misch C. Maxillary sinus lift and elevation with subantral augmentation. In: Misch C (ed). Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St Louis: Mosby, 1993:545-574.
5. Friberg B, Ivanoff CJ, Lekholm U. Inferior alveolar nerve transposition in combination with Brånemark implant treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992;12:441-449.
6. Rosenquist B. Implant placement in combination with nerve transpositioning: Experiences with the first 100 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:522-531.
7. Ten Bruggenkate CM, Sutter F, Oosterbeek HS, Schroeder A. Indications for angled implants. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67: 85-93.
8. Clelland NL, Gilat A, McGlumphy A, Brantley W. A photoelastic and strain gauge analysis of angled abutments for an implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8: 541-548.
9. Celletti R, Pameijer CH, Bracchetti G, Donath K, Persichetti G, Visani I. Histologic evaluation of osseointegrated implants restored in nonaxial functional occlusion with pre-angled abutments. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1995;15:563-573.
10. Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Sadler JP, McKay ML. Comparison of screw loosening, rotation, and deflection among three implant designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:270-278.
11. Loe H. The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol 1967;36:610-616.
12. Gelb DA, Lazzara RJ. Hierarchy of objectives in implant placement to maximize esthetics: Use of pre-angulated abutments. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1993;13: 277-287.