Moment-based inference predicts bimodality in transient gene expression

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 21, 2012, Pages 8340-8345

  Zechner, Christoph ^a   Ruess, Jakob ^a   Krenn, Peter ^a   Pelet, Serge ^a   Peter, Matthias ^a   Lygeros, John ^a   Koeppl, Heinz ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Extrinsic variability; High osmolarity glycerol pathway; Moment dynamics; Parameter inference; Stochastic kinetic models

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL POPULATION; CELLULAR STRESS RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; NONHUMAN; OSMOTIC STRESS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; STOCHASTIC MODEL;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GLYCEROL; MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASES; MODELS, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; WATER-ELECTROLYTE BALANCE;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 84861443923     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1200161109     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Hengl S, Kreutz C, Timmer J, Maiwald T (2007) Data-based identifiability analysis of non-linear dynamical models. Bioinformatics 23:2612-2618. (Pubitemid 350048365)
2. Munsky B, Trinh B, Khammash M (2009) Listening to the noise: Random fluctuations reveal gene network parameters. Mol Syst Biol 5:318.
3. Boys RJ, Wilkinson DJ, Kirkwood TBL (2007) Bayesian inference for a discretely observed stochastic kinetic model. Stat Comput 18:125-135.
4. Elowitz MB, Levine AJ, Siggia ED, Swain PS (2002) Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297:1183-1186. (Pubitemid 36193353)
5. Colman-Lerner A, et al. (2005) Regulated cell-to-cell variation in a cell-fate decision system. Nature 437:699-706. (Pubitemid 41486534)
6. Snijder B, Pelkmans L (2011) Origins of regulated cell-to-cell variability. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12:119-125.
7. Shahrezaei V, Ollivier JF, Swain PS (2008) Colored extrinsic fluctuations and stochastic gene expression. Mol Syst Biol 4:196.
8. Hilfinger A, Paulsson J (2011) Separating intrinsic from extrinsic fluctuations in dynamic biological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:12167-12172.
9. Hasenauer J, et al. (2011) Identification of models of heterogeneous cell populations from population snapshot data. BMC Bioinformatics 12:125.
10. Koeppl H, Zechner C, Ganguly A, Pelet S, Peter M (2012) Accounting for extrinsic variability in the estimation of stochastic rate constants. Int J Robust Nonlin, 10.1002/ rnc.2804.
11. Golightly A, Wilkinson DJ (2005) Bayesian inference for stochastic kinetic models using a diffusion approximation. Biometrics 61:781-788.
12. Mettetal JT, Muzzey D, Pedraza JM, Ozbudak EM, van Oudenaarden A (2006) Predicting stochastic gene expression dynamics in single cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:7304-7309. (Pubitemid 43727828)
13. Guido NJ, et al. (2006) A bottom-up approach to gene regulation. Nature 439:856-860. (Pubitemid 43255704)
14. Munsky B, Khammash M (2006) The finite state projection algorithm for the solution of the chemical master equation. J Chem Phys 124:044104.
15. Wolf V, Goel R, Mateescu M, Henzinger TA (2010) Solving the chemical master equation using sliding windows. BMC Syst Biol 4:42.
16. Gillespie D (1976) A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions. J Comput Phys 22:403-434.
17. Fishman GS (1996) Monte Carlo: Concepts, algorithms, and applications. (Springer, Berlin).
18. Whittle P (1957) On the use of the normal approximation in the treatment of stochastic processes. J Roy Stat Soc B Met 19:268-281.
19. Hespanha J (2008) Moment closure for biochemical networks. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing (IEEE) pp 142-147.
20. Ruess J, Milias-Argeitis A, Summers S, Lygeros J (2011) Moment estimation for chemically reacting systems by extended Kalman filtering. J Chem Phys 135:165102.
21. Pelet S, et al. (2011) Transient activation of the HOG MAPK pathway regulates bimodal gene expression. Science 332:732-735.
22. Shalem O (2008) Transient transcriptional responses to stress are generated by opposing effects of mRNA production and degradation. Mol Syst Biol 4:4.
23. Hohmann S (2002) Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:300-372.
24. Bishop CM (2007) Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. New York (Springer).
25. Bellman R, Astrom K (1970) On structural identifiability. Math Biosci 7:329-339.
26. Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ (1996) Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. (Chapman & Hall, New York).
27. Gasch AP, et al. (2000) Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 11:4241-4257.
28. Ghaemmaghami S, et al. (2003) Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425:737-741. (Pubitemid 37314318)
29. Muzzey D, Gómez-Uribe Ca, Mettetal JT, van Oudenaarden A (2009) A systems-level analysis of perfect adaptation in yeast osmoregulation. Cell 138:160-171.
30. Zi Z, Liebermeister W, Klipp E (2010) A quantitative study of the Hog1 MAPK response to fluctuating osmotic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PloS One 5:e9522.
31. Macia J, et al. (2009) Dynamic signaling in the Hog1 MAPK pathway relies on high basal signal transduction. Sci Signal 2:ra13.
32. Capaldi AP, et al. (2008) Structure and function of a transcriptional network activated by the MAPK Hog1. Nat Genet 40:1300-1306.
33. Newman JRS, et al. (2006) Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 441:840-846.
34. Mateus C, Avery SV (2000) Destabilized green fluorescent protein for monitoring dynamic changes in yeast gene expression with flow cytometry. Yeast 16:1313-1323.
35. Proft M, Gibbons F, Copeland M, Roth F, Struhl K (2005) Genomewide identification of Sko1 target promoters reveals a regulatory network that operates in response to osmotic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 4:1343-1352. (Pubitemid 41176688)
36. Hespanha J (2006) Modeling and analysis of stochastic hybrid systems. IEE Proceedings Control Theory And Applications 153:520-535.