Erratum: Folding helical proteins in explicit solvent using dihedral-biased tempering (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2012) 109, 21 (8139-8144) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1112143109);Folding helical proteins in explicit solvent using dihedral-biased tempering

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 21, 2012, Pages 8139-8144

  Zhang, Cheng ^a   Ma, Jianpeng ^a,b  

^a Rice University   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Enhanced sampling; Molecular dynamics; Packing chirality; Protein folding

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; SOLVENT;

ARTICLE; ATOM; CHIRALITY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; LARGE SCALE PRODUCTION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MUTANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIMULATION;

EID: 84861428431     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1215166109     Document Type: Erratum

References (57)

1. Onuchic JN, Luthey-Schulten Z, Wolynes PG (1997) Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. Annu Rev Phys Chem 48:545-600. (Pubitemid 127443918)
2. Daggett V, Fersht A (2003) The present view of the mechanism of protein folding. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:497-502. (Pubitemid 36648595)
3. Kubelka J, Hofrichter J, Eaton WA (2004) The protein folding 'speed limit'. Curr Opin Struct Biol 14:76-88.
4. Scheraga HA, Khalili M, Liwo A (2007) Protein-folding dynamics: Overview of molecular simulation techniques. Annu Rev Phys Chem 58:57-83. (Pubitemid 46877585)
5. Dill KA, Ozkan SB,Weikl TR, Chodera JD, Voelz VA (2007) The protein folding problem: When will it be solved? Curr Opin Struct Biol 17:342-346. (Pubitemid 47021366)
6. Duan Y, Kollman PA (1998) Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. Science 282:740-744. (Pubitemid 28489385)
7. Seibert MM, Patriksson A, Hess B, van der Spoel D (2005) Reproducible polypeptide folding and structure prediction using molecular dynamics simulations. J Mol Biol 354:173-183. (Pubitemid 41527222)
8. Ensign DL, Kasson PM, Pande VS (2007) Heterogeneity even at the speed limit of folding: Large-scale molecular dynamics study of a fast-folding variant of the villin headpiece. J Mol Biol 374:806-816. (Pubitemid 350019606)
9. Juraszek J, Bolhuis PG (2008) Rate constant and reaction coordinate of Trp-cage folding in explicit water. Biophys J 95:4246-4257.
10. Kannan S, Zacharias M (2009) Folding simulations of Trp-cage mini protein in explicit solvent using biasing potential replica-exchange molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins 76:448-460.
11. Freddolino PL, Schulten K (2009) Common structural transitions in explicit-solvent simulations of villin headpiece folding. Biophys J 97:2338-2347.
12. Zhang C, Ma J (2010) Enhanced sampling and applications in protein folding in explicit solvent. J Chem Phys 132:244101.
13. Shaw DE, et al. (2010) Atomic-level characterization of the structural dynamics of proteins. Science 330:341-346.
14. Best RB, Mittal J (2010) Balance between alpha and beta structures in ab initio protein folding. J Phys Chem B 114:8790-8798.
15. Day R, Paschek D, Garcia AE (2010) Microsecond simulations of the folding/unfolding thermodynamics of the Trp-cage miniprotein. Proteins 78:1889-1899.
16. Ikebe J, Standley DM, Nakamura H, Higo J (2011) Ab initio simulation of a 57-residue protein in explicit solvent reproduces the native conformation in the lowest freeenergy cluster. Protein Sci 20:187-196.
17. Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror RO, Shaw DE (2011) How fast-folding proteins fold. Science 334:517-520.
18. Zhou Y, Karplus M (1999) Folding of a model three-helix bundle protein: A thermodynamic and kinetic analysis. J Mol Biol 293:917-951. (Pubitemid 29527675)
19. Jang S, Shin S, Pak Y (2003) Replica-exchange method using the generalized effective potential. Phys Rev Lett 91:058305.
20. Bryson JW, Desjarlais JR, Handel TM, DeGrado WF (1998) From coiled coils to small globular proteins: Design of a native-like three-helix bundle. Protein Sci 7:1404-1414. (Pubitemid 28272909)
21. Walsh ST, Cheng H, Bryson JW, Roder H, DeGrado WF (1999) Solution structure and dynamics of a de novo designed three-helix bundle protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5486-5491. (Pubitemid 29234644)
22. Johansson JS, Gibney BR, Skalicky JJ, Wand AJ, Dutton PL (1998) A native-like threealpha- helix bundle protein from structure-based redesign: A novel maquette scaffold. J Am Chem Soc 120:3881-3886. (Pubitemid 28300152)
23. Dai QH, et al. (2002) Structure of a de novo designed protein model of radical enzymes. J Am Chem Soc 124:10952-10953.
24. Ramboarina S, et al. (2010) Structural insights into serine-rich fimbriae from Grampositive bacteria. J Biol Chem 285:32446-32457.
25. Go A, Kim S, Baum J, Hecht MH (2008) Structure and dynamics of de novo proteins from a designed superfamily of 4-helix bundles. Protein Sci 17:821-832. (Pubitemid 351629577)
26. Ferrenberg AM, Swendsen RH (1988) New Monte-Carlo technique for studying phasetransitions. Phys Rev Lett 61:2635-2638.
27. Ferrenberg AM, Swendsen RH (1989) Optimized Monte-Carlo data-analysis. Phys Rev Lett 63:1195-1198.
28. Chodera JD, Swope WC, Pitera JW, Seok C, Dill KA (2007) Use of the weighted histogram analysis method for the analysis of simulated and parallel tempering simulations. J Chem Theory Comput 3:26-41.
29. Yang JS, Chen WW, Skolnick J, Shakhnovich EI (2007) All-atom ab initio folding of a diverse set of proteins. Structure 15:53-63. (Pubitemid 46073772)
30. Meinke JH, Hansmann UH (2009) Free-energy-driven folding and thermodynamics of the 67-residue protein GS-alpha3W-a large-scale Monte Carlo study. J Comput Chem 30:1642-1648.
31. Czaplewski C, Kalinowski S, Liwo A, Scheraga HA (2009) Application of multiplexed replica exchange molecular dynamics to the UNRES force field: Tests with alpha and alpha+beta proteins. J Chem Theory Comput 5:627-640.
32. Antonyuk SV, et al. (2011) Carbon monoxide poisoning is prevented by the energy costs of conformational changes in gas-binding haemproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:15780-15785.
33. Arnesano F, et al. (1999) The solution structure of oxidized Escherichia coli cytochrome b562. Biochemistry 38:8657-8670.
34. Vakonakis I, Langenhan T, Promel S, Russ A, Campbell ID (2008) Solution structure and sugar-binding mechanism of mouse latrophilin-1 RBL: A 7TM receptor-attached lectin-like domain. Structure 16:944-953. (Pubitemid 351778373)
35. Booth V, Koth CM, Edwards AM, Arrowsmith CH (2000) Structure of a conserved domain common to the transcription factors TFIIS, elongin A, and CRSP70. J Biol Chem 275:31266-31268.
36. Levy Y, Cho SS, Shen T, Onuchic JN, Wolynes PG (2005) Symmetry and frustration in protein energy landscapes: A near degeneracy resolves the Rop dimer-folding mystery. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:2373-2378. (Pubitemid 40279383)
37. Schug A, Whitford PC, Levy Y, Onuchic JN (2007) Mutations as trapdoors to two competing native conformations of the Rop-dimer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:17674-17679. (Pubitemid 350210893)
38. Gambin Y, et al. (2009) Direct single-molecule observation of a protein living in two opposed native structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:10153-10158.
39. Baltzer L, Nilsson H, Nilsson J (2001) De novo design of proteins-what are the rules? Chem Rev 101:3153-3163. (Pubitemid 35377815)
40. Best RB, Hummer G (2009) Optimized molecular dynamics force fields applied to the helix-coil transition of polypeptides. J Phys Chem B 113:9004-9015.
41. Lyubartsev AP, Martsinovski AA, Shevkunov SV, Vorontsovvelyaminov PN (1992) New approach to Monte-Carlo calculation of the free-energy-method of expanded ensembles. J Chem Phys 96:1776-1783.
42. Marinari E, Parisi G (1992) Simulated tempering-a new Monte-Carlo scheme. Europhys Lett 19:451-458.
43. Zhang C, Ma J (2007) Simulation via direct computation of partition functions. Phys Rev E 76:036708.
44. Li H, Fajer M, Yang W (2007) Simulated scaling method for localized enhanced sampling and simultaneous "alchemical" free energy simulations: A general method for molecular mechanical, quantum mechanical, and quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical simulations. J Chem Phys 126:024106.
45. Geyer CJ (1991) Proceedings of the 23rd Symposium on the Interface (Am Statistical Association, New York).
46. Hansmann UHE (1997) Parallel tempering algorithm for conformational studies of biological molecules. Chem Phys Lett 281:140-150.
47. Hukushima K, Nemoto K (1996) Exchange Monte Carlo method and application to spin glass simulations. J Physical Soc Japan 65:1604-1608. (Pubitemid 126456584)
48. Swendsen RH, Wang JS (1986) Replica Monte-Carlo simulation of spin-glasses. Phys Rev Lett 57:2607-2609.
49. Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E (2008) GROMACS 4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 4:435-447.
50. Duan Y, et al. (2003) A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations. J Comput Chem 24:1999-2012.
51. Sorin EJ, Pande VS (2005) Exploring the helix-coil transition via all-atom equilibrium ensemble simulations. Biophys J 88:2472-2493. (Pubitemid 40976118)
52. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79:926-935.
53. Essmann U, et al. (1995) A smooth particle messh Ewald method. J Chem Phys 103:8577-8593.
54. Bussi G, Donadio D, ParrinelloM(2007) Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J Chem Phys 126:014101.
55. Miyamoto S, Kollman PA (1992) SETTLE: An analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithms for rigid water models. J Comput Chem 13:952-962.
56. Hess B (2007) P-LINCS: A parallel linear constraint solver for molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 4:116-142.
57. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14:33-38. (Pubitemid 26152973)