The rise and fall of small worlds: Exploring the dynamics of social structure

Organization Science

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 449-471

  Gulati, Ranjay ^a   Sytch, Maxim ^b   Tatarynowicz, Adam ^c  

^a HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Economic sociology; Organization theory; Strategic alliances networks; Strategy and policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861396547     PISSN: 10477039     EISSN: 15265455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0592     Document Type: Article

References (118)

1. Ahuja, G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3) 425-455.
2. Bae, J., M. Gargiulo. 2004. Partner substitutability, alliance network structure, and firm profitability in the telecommunications industry. Acad. Management J. 47(6) 843-859.
3. Baker, W. E. 1984. The social structure of a national securities market. Amer. J. Sociol. 89(4) 775-811.
4. Baker, W., R. R. Faulkner. 2009. Social capital, double embeddedness, and mechanisms of stability and change. Amer. Behav. Scientist 52(11) 1531-1555.
5. Barabási, A.-L., R. Albert. 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439) 509-512.
6. Baron, R. M., D. A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6) 1173-1182.
7. Baum, J. A. C., R. Cowan, N. Jonard. 2010. Network-independent partner selection and the evolution of innovation networks. Management Sci. 56(11) 2094-2110.
8. Baum, J. A. C., A. V. Shipilov, T. J. Rowley. 2003. Where do small worlds come from? Indust. Corporate Change 12(4) 697-725.
9. Baum, J. A. C., T. J. Rowley, A. V. Shipilov, Y.-T. Chuang. 2005. Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(4) 536-575.
10. Belsey, D. A., E. Kuh, R. E. Welsch. 1980. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
11. Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
12. Blau, P. M. 1977. A macrosociological theory of social structure. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(1) 26-54.
13. Brass, D. J. 1984. Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(4) 518-539.
14. Bresnahan, T. F. 1999. New modes of competition: Implications for the future structure of the computer industry. J. A. Eisenach, T. M. Lenard, eds. Competition, Innovation and the Microsoft Monopoly: Antitrust in the Digital Marketplace. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 155-209.
15. Bresnahan, T. F. 2000. Competition, co-operation and predation in innovative industries. Fighting Cartels-Why and How? 3RD Nordic Competition Policy Conf., Konkurrensverket (Swedish Competition Authority), Stockholm, 116-144.
16. Bresnahan, T. F., S. Greenstein. 1999. Technological competition and the structure of the computer industry. J. Indust. Econom. 47(1) 1-40.
17. Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
18. Burt, R. S. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2) 349-399.
19. Burt, R. S. 2005. Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford University Press, New York.
20. Casciaro, T. 2003. Determinants of governance structures in alliances: The role of strategic, task, and partner uncertainties. Indust. Corporate Change 12(6) 1223-1251.
21. Chesbrough, H. W. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
22. Clauset, A., C. R. Shalizi, M. E. J. Newman. 2009. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev. 51(4) 661-703.
23. Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
24. Cowan, R., N. Jonard. 2009. Knowledge portfolios and the organization of innovation networks. Acad. Management Rev. 34(2) 320-342.
25. Cowan, R., N. Jonard, J.-B. Zimmermann. 2007. Bilateral collaboration and the emergence of innovation networks. Management Sci. 53(7) 1051-1067.
26. Datamonitor. 2006. Internet-based business: Bubble trouble. (February 7).
27. Davis, J. A. 1967. Clustering and structural balance in graphs. Human Relations 20(2) 181-187.
28. Davis, G. F., H. R. Greve. 1997. Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(1) 1-37.
29. Davis, G. F., M. Yoo, W. E. Baker. 2003. The small world of the American corporate elite, 1982-2001. Strategic Organ. 1(3) 301-326.
30. Dedrick, J., K. L. Kraemer. 2005. The impacts of IT on firm and industry structure: The personal computer industry. Calif. Management Rev. 47(3) 122-142.
31. Doreian, P., F. N. Stokman. 1997. The dynamics and evolution of social networks. P. Doreian, F. N. Stokman, eds. Evolution of Social Networks. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1-17.
32. Eisenhardt, K. M., B. N. Tabrizi. 1995. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1) 84-110.
33. Emirbyaer, M., A. Mische. 1998. What is agency? Amer. J. Sociol. 103(4) 962-1023.
34. Fernandez, R. M., I. Fernandez-Mateo. 2006. Networks, race, and hiring. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 71(1) 42-71.
35. Galaskiewicz, J., W. Bielefeld, M. Dowell. 2006. Networks and organizational growth: A study of community based nonprofits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3) 337-380.
36. Garud, R., S. Jain, A. Kumaraswamy. 2002. Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Acad. Management J. 45(1) 196-214.
37. Gell-Mann, M. 1994. The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex. W. H. Freeman, New York.
38. Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure. University of California Press, Berkeley.
39. Girvan, M., M. E. J. Newman. 2002. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99(12) 7821-7826.
40. Gomes-Casseres, B. 1996. The Alliance Revolution: The New Shape of Business Rivalry. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
41. Granovetter, M. 1982. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisted. P. V. Marsden, N. Lin, eds. Social Structure and Network Analysis. Sage Publications, London, 105-131.
42. Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3) 481-510.
43. Greif, A. 1993. Contract enforceability and economic institutions in early trade: The Maghribi traders' coalition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(3) 99-118.
44. Grove, A. S. 1996. Only the Paranoid Survive. HarperCollins Business, New York.
45. Guimerà, R., L. A. N. Amaral. 2005. Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks. Nature 433(7028) 895-900.
46. Guimerà, R., M. Sales-Pardo, L. A. N. Amaral. 2004. Modularity from fluctuations in random graphs and complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 70(2, Part 2) 025101.
47. Gulati, R. 1995. Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(4) 619-652.
48. Gulati, R. 1998. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management J. 19(4) 293-317.
49. Gulati, R. 1999. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 20(5) 397-420.
50. Gulati, R. 2007. Managing Network Resources: Alliances, Affiliations, and Other Relational Assets. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
51. Gulati, R., M. Gargiulo. 1999. Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5) 1439-1493.
52. Gulati, R., M. Sytch. 2007. Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: Effects of embeddedness on exchange performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1) 32-69.
53. Hagedoorn, J., M. Cloodt, N. Roijakkers. 2006. Trends and patterns in interfirm R&D networks in the global computer industry: An analysis of major developments, 1970-1999. Bus. History Rev. 80(4) 725-746.
54. Hall, B. H., A. B. Jaffe, M. Trajtenerg. 2001. The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights, and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
55. Haunschild, P. R., C. M. Beckman. 1998. When do interlocks matter?: Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4) 815-844.
56. Hilbe, J. M. 2007. Negative Binomial Regression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
57. Jackson, M. O., B. W. Rogers. 2007. Meeting strangers and friends of friends: How random are social networks? Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3) 890-915.
58. Jaffe, A. B., M. Trajtenberg. 2002. Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
59. Johnson, S. C. 1967. Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika 32(3) 241-254.
60. Karinthy, F. 1929. Chains: Everything Is Different. Atheneum Press, Budapest.
61. Kogut, B., G. Walker. 2001. The small world of Germany and the durability of national networks. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 66(3) 317-335.
62. Kossinets, G. 2006. Effects of missing data in social networks. Soc. Networks 28(3) 247-268.
63. Larson, A. 1992. Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(1) 76-104.
64. Lavie, D., L. Rosenkopf. 2006. Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Acad. Management J. 49(4) 797-818.
65. Lazer, D., A. Friedman. 2007. The network structure of exploration and exploitation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(2) 667-694.
66. Li, S. X., T. J. Rowley. 2002. Inertia and evaluation mechanisms in interorganizational partner selection: Syndicate formation among U.S. investment banks. Acad. Management J. 45(6) 1104-1119.
67. Lin, N. 2001. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
68. Madhavan, R., B. R. Koka, J. E. Prescott. 1998. Networks in transition: How industry events (re)shape interfirm relationships. Strategic Management J. 19(5) 439-459.
69. Malerba, F., L. Orsenigo. 1996. The dynamics and evolution of industries. Indust. Corporate Change 5(1) 51-87.
70. Marsden, P. V., N. E. Friedkin. 1993. Network studies of social influence. Sociol. Methods Res. 22(1) 127-151.
71. McEvily, B., A. Zaheer. 1999. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management J. 20(12) 1133-1156.
72. McPherson, J. M., L. Smith-Lovin, J. M. Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 27(1) 415-444.
73. Milgram, S. 1967. The small world problem. Psych. Today 2 60-67.
74. Mizruchi, M. S. 1992. The Structure of Corporate Political Action: Interfirm Relations and Their Consequences. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
75. Mizruchi, M. S., L. B. Stearns, C. Marquis. 2006. The conditional nature of embeddedness: A study of borrowing by large U.S. firms, 1973-1994. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 71(2) 310-333.
76. Newman, M. E. J. 2001. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98(2) 404-409.
77. Newman, M. E. J. 2002. Assortative mixing in networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89(20) 208701.
78. Newman, M. E. J. 2003. Properties of highly clustered networks. Phys. Rev. E 68(2, Part 2) 026121.
79. Newman, M. E. J. 2004. Detecting community structure in networks. Eur. Physical J. B 38(2) 321-330.
80. Newman, M. E. J., M. Girvan. 2004. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Rev. E 69(2) 026113.
81. Owen-Smith, J., W. W. Powell. 2004. Knowledge networks in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. 15(1) 5-21.
82. Ozcan, P., K. M. Eisenhardt. 2009. Origin of alliance portfolios: Entrepreneurs, network srategies, and firm performance. Acad. Management J. 52(2) 246-279.
83. Perkins, A. B., M. C. Perkins. 2001. The Internet bubble: The Inside Story on Why It Burst-And What You Can Do to Profit Now. HarperBusiness, New York.
84. Phillips, D. J., E. W. Zuckerman. 2001. Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(2) 379-429.
85. Pimentel, B. 2003. Dell says some tech firms doomed. San Francisco Chronicle (September 9) B1.
86. Podolny, J. M. 2001. Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1) 33-60.
87. Porac, J. F., H. Thomas, F. Wilson, D. Paton, A. Kanfer. 1995. Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2) 203-227.
88. Powell, W. W., K. W. Koput, L. Smith-Doerr. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1) 116-145.
89. Powell, W. W., D. R. White, K. W. Koput, J. Owen-Smith. 2005. Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(4) 1132-1205.
90. Richtel, M. 2000. Signs of market saturation in PC world. New York Times (October 8) C8.
91. Riolli-Staltzman, L., F. Luthans. 2001. After the bubble burst: How small high-tech firms can keep in front of the wave. Acad. Management Executive 15(3) 114-124.
92. Rosenkopf, L., G. Padula. 2008. Investigating the microstructure of network evolution: Alliance formation in the mobile communications industry. Organ. Sci. 19(5) 669-687.
93. Rosenkopf, L., M. A. Schilling. 2007. Comparing alliance network structure across industries: Observations and explanations. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 1(3-4) 191-209.
94. Rosenkopf, L., M. L. Tushman. 1998. The coevolution of community networks and technology: Lessons from the flight simulation industry. Indust. Corporate Change 7(2) 311-346.
95. Rosenkopf, L., A. Metiu, V. P. George. 2001. From the bottom up? Technical committee activity and alliance formation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4) 748-772.
96. Roussos, G. 2005. Ubiquitous and Pervasive Computing: New Frontiers for Electronic Business, Computer Communications and Networks. Springer, Berlin.
97. Rowley, T., D. Behrens, D. Krackhardt. 2000. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management J. 21(3) 369-386.
98. Schilling, M. 2009. Understanding alliance data. Strategic Management J. 30(3) 233-260.
99. Schilling, M. A., C. C. Phelps. 2007. Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Sci. 53(7) 1113-1126.
100. Sewell, W. H., Jr. 1992. A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(1) 1-29.
101. Shannon, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Tech. J. 27(July-October) 379-423.
102. Shipilov, A. V., S. X. Li. 2008. To have a cake and eat it too? Structural holes' influence on status accumulation and market performance in collaborative networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(1) 73-108.
103. Shipilov, A. V., S. X. Li. 2012. The missing link: The effect of customers on the formation of relationships among producers in the multiplex triads. Organ. Sci. 23(2) 472-491.
104. Sorenson, O., T. E. Stuart. 2001. Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(6) 1546-1586.
105. Stuart, T. E. 1998. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a hightechnology industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(3) 668-698.
106. Stuart, T. E. 2000. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a hightechnology industry. Strategic Management J. 21(8) 791-811.
107. Uzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(4) 674-698.
108. Uzzi, B., J. Spiro. 2005. Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(2) 447-504.
109. Waldrop, M. M. 1992. Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. Simon & Schuster, New York.
110. Wang, L., E. J. Zajac. 2007. Alliance or acquisition? A dyadic perspective on interfirm resource combinations. Strategic Management J. 28(13) 1291-1317.
111. Wasserman, S., K. Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
112. Watts, D. J. 1999. Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(2) 493-527.
113. Watts, D. J., S. H. Strogatz. 1998. Collective dynamics of "smallworld" networks. Nature 393(6684) 440-442.
114. White, H. 1980. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48(4) 817-838.
115. White, H. C. 1981. Where do markets come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 87(3) 517-547.
116. Zaheer, A., G. G. Bell. 2005. Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management J. 26(9) 809-825.
117. Zaheer, A., G. Soda. 2009. Network evolution: The origins of structural holes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1) 1-31.
118. Zaheer, A., E. Hernandez, S. Banerjee. 2010. Prior alliances with targets and acquisition performance in knowledge-intensive industries. Organ. Sci. 21(5) 1072-1091.