Individual differences in premotor and motor recruitment during speech perception

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 50, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1380-1392

  Szenkovits, Gayaneh ^a   Peelle, Jonathan E ^a,b   Norris, Dennis ^a   Davis, Matthew H ^a  

^a MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dual stream model; FMRI; Individual differences; Motor cortex; Premotor cortex; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANGULAR GYRUS; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BOLD SIGNAL; BRAIN REGION; CAUDATE NUCLEUS; CEREBELLUM; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CUNEUS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUSIFORM GYRUS; GLOBUS PALLIDUS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFERIOR COLLICULUS; INFERIOR FRONTAL GYRUS; INFERIOR PARIETAL LOBULE; INFERIOR TEMPORAL GYRUS; INSULA; LEFT MIDDLE CINGULUM; LEFT ROLANDIC OPERCULUM; MALE; MIDDLE TEMPORAL GYRUS; MOTOR CORTEX; NORMAL HUMAN; OPERCULUM (BRAIN); PARS OPERCULARIS; PARS TRIANGULARIS; PHONETICS; POSTCENTRAL GYRUS; PRECUNEUS; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; PUTAMEN; READING; SHORT TERM MEMORY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SUPERIOR TEMPORAL GYRUS; SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA; TASK PERFORMANCE; THALAMUS; VERBAL MEMORY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INDIVIDUALITY; LANGUAGE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; OXYGEN; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROBABILITY; READING; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84861225749     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.023     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Ashburner J., Friston K.J. Unified segmentation. NeuroImage 2005, 26:839-851.
2. Ashburner J., Friston K.J. Multimodal image coregistration and partitioning - A unified framework. NeuroImage 1997, 6:209-217.
3. Baddeley A. Recent developments in working memory. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1998, 8:234-238.
4. Baddeley A., Gathercole S., Papagno C., Degli U. The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review 1998, 105:158-173.
5. Baddeley A.D., Hitch G.I. Working memory 1974, vol. 8. Academic Press, New York.
6. Besner D. Phonology, lexical access in reading, and articulatory suppression: A critical review. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 1987, 39(3, Sect A):467-478.
7. Besner D., Davies J., Daniels S. Reading for meaning: The effects of concurrent articulation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 1981, 33a(4):415-437.
8. Brown G.D. Phonological coding in rhyming and homophony judgement. Acta Psychologica 1987, 65(3):247-262.
9. Buchsbaum B.R., Hickok G., Humphries C. Role of left posterior superior temporal gyrus in phonological processing for speech perception and production. Cognitive Science 2001, 25:663-678.
10. Buchsbaum B.R., Olsen R.K., Koch P., Berman K.F. Human dorsal and ventral auditory streams subserve rehearsal-based and echoic processes during verbal working memory. Neuron 2005, 48:687-697.
11. Burton M.W., Small S.L., Blumstein S.E. The role of segmentation in phonological processing: An fMRI investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12(4):679-690.
12. Callan D., Callan A., Gamez M., Sato M.-a., Kawato M. Premotor cortex mediates perceptual performance. NeuroImage 2010, 51:844-858.
13. Cowan N. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24(1):87-114.
14. D'Ausilio A., Pulvermüller F., Salmas P., Bufalari I., Begliomini C., Fadiga L. The motor somatotopy of speech perception. Current Biology 2009, 381-385.
15. Davis M., Johnsrude I. Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension. Stimulus 2003, 23:3423-3431.
16. Davis M.H., Johnsrude I.S. Hearing speech sounds: Top-down influences on the interface between audition and speech perception. Hearing Research 2007, 229:132-147.
17. Deeks J.M., Carlyon R.P. Simulations of cochlear implant hearing using filtered harmonic complexes: Implications for concurrent sound segregation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2004, (115):1736-1746.
18. Devlin J.T., Aydelott J. Speech perception: Motoric contributions versus the motor theory. Current Biology 2009, 19(5):198-200.
19. Dufor O., Serniclaes W., Sprenger-Charolles L., Demonet J.F. Left premotor cortex and allophonic speech perception in dyslexia: A PET study. NeuroImage 2009, 46(1):241-248.
20. Edwards J., Beckman M.E., Munson B. The interaction between vocabulary size and phonotactic production accuracy and fluency in nonword repetition. Hearing Research 2004.
21. Fadiga L., Ferrara á., Biomediche S., Umana F., Parma á., Umana F., et al. Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: A TMS study. Neuroscience 2002, 15:399-402.
22. Forster K.I., Forster J.C. DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 2003, (35):116-124.
23. Friston K., Ashburner J., Frith C., Poline J.-B., Heather J., Frackowiak R. Spatial registration and normalization of images. Human Brain Mapping 1995, 2:165-189.
24. Friston K.J., Frith C.D., Liddle P.F., Frackowiak R.S. Comparing functional, (PET) images: The assessment of significant change. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 1991, 11(4):690-699.
25. Gathercole S., Baddeley A. The role of phonological memory in vocabulary acquisition: A study of young children learning new names. British Journal of Psychology 1990, 81:439-454.
26. Gathercole S.E., Frankish C.R., Pickering S.J., Peaker S. Phonotactic influences on short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1999, 25(1):84-95.
27. Hashimoto Y., Sakai K.L. Brain activations during conscious self-monitoring of speech production with delayed auditory feedback: An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping 2003, 20:22-28.
28. Hasson U., Nusbaum H.C., Small S.L. Repetition suppression for spoken sentences and the effect of task demands. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18(12):2013-2029.
29. Hickok G. Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 1229-1243.
30. Hickok G. Speech perception does not rely on motor cortex: Response to D'Ausilio et al. Current Biology 2009, Available at: http://www.cell.com/current-biology/comments_Dausilio.
31. Hickok G. The role of mirror neurons in speech perception and action word semantics. Language and Cognitive Processes 2010, 25:749-776.
32. Hickok G., Buchsbaum B. Temporal lobe speech perception systems are part of the verbal working memory circuit: Evidence from two recent fMRI studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2003, 26:740-741.
33. Hickok G., Buchsbaum B., Humphries C., Muftuler T. Auditory-motor interaction revealed by fMRI: Speech, music, and working memory in area Spt. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15(5):673-682.
34. Hickok G., Okada K., Barr W., Pa J., Rogalsky C., Donnelly K., et al. Bilateral capacity for speech sound processing in auditory comprehension: Evidence from Wada procedures. Brain and Language 2008, 107:179-184.
35. Hickok G., Poeppel D. Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:131-138.
36. Hickok G., Poeppel D. Dorsal and ventral streams: A framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition 2004, 92:67-99.
37. Hickok G., Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature 2007, 8:393-402.
38. Jarrold C., Tam H. Rehearsal and the development of working memory. In cognitive development and working memory: A dialogue between neo-piagetian and cognitive approaches 2010, Psychology Press, Hove.
39. Kriegeskorte N., Simmons W., Bellgowan P., Baker C. Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: The dangers of double dipping. Nature Neuroscience 2009, (12):535-540.
40. Lichtheim L. On aphasia. Brain 1885/2006, 1347-1350.
41. Loftus G.R., Masson M.E. Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1994, 1(4):476-490.
42. Lotto A.J., Hickok G.S., Holt L.L. Reflections on mirror neurons and speech perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 110-114.
43. Meister I.G., Wilson S.M., Deblieck C., Wu A.D. The essential role of premotor cortex in speech perception. Current Biology 2007, 17:1692-1696.
44. Morais J., Bertelson P., Cary L., Alegria J. Literacy training and speech segmentation. Cognition 1986, 24:45-64.
45. Morais J., Cary L., Alegria J., Bertelson P. Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously?. Cognition 1979, 7:323-331.
46. Morais J., Kolinsky R. Perception and awareness in phonological processing: The case of the phoneme. Cognition 1994, 50:287-297.
47. Möttönen R., Watkins K.E. Motor representations of articulators contribute to categorical perception of speech sounds. The Journal of neuroscience: The official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 2009, 29:9819-9825.
48. Obleser J., Wise R.J.S., Dresner M.A., Scott S.K. Functional integration across brain regions improves speech perception under adverse listening conditions. The Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 27(9):2283-2289.
49. Osnes B., Hugdahl K., Specht K. Effective connectivity analysis demonstrates involvement of premotor cortex during speech perception. NeuroImage 2011, 54(3):2437-2445.
50. Price C.J. The anatomy of language: A review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2010, 1191:62-88.
51. Price C.J., Wise R.J.S., Warburton E.A., Moore C.J., Howard D., Patterson K., et al. Hearing and saying. The functional neuro-anatomy of auditory word processing. Brain 1996, 119:919-931.
52. Pulvermüller F., Huss M., Kherif F., Moscoso F., Hauk O., Shtyrov Y. Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2006, 103:7865-7870.
53. Richardson J.T. Phonology and reading: The effects of articulatory suppression upon homophony and rhyme judgments. Language and Cognitive Processes 1987, 2(3-4):229-244.
54. Rodd J., Davis M., Johnsrude I. The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15:1261-1269.
55. Rodd J., Longe O., Randall B., Tyler L. The functional organisation of the fronto-temporal language system: Evidence from syntactic and semantic ambiguity. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:1324-1335.
56. Sato M., Tremblay P., Gracco V. A mediating role of the premotor cortex in phoneme segmentation. Brain and Language 2009, 111(1):1-7.
57. Saur D., Kreher W.B., Schnell S., Ku D., Vry M.-S., Umarova R., et al. Ventral and dorsal pathways for language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2008, 105.
58. Scott S.K., Blank S.C., Rosen S., Wise R.J.S. Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain 2000, 123:2400-2406.
59. Scott S.K., Johnsrude I.S. The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception. Trends in Neurosciences 2003, 26:100-107.
60. Scott S.K., Mcgettigan C., Eisner F. A little more conversation, a little less action - Candidate roles for the motor cortex in speech perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2009, 10.
61. Scott S.K., Wise R.J.S. The functional neuroanatomy of prelexical processing in speech perception. Cognition 2004, 92:13-45.
62. Seghier M.L., Price C.J. Dissociating functional brain networks by decoding the between-subject variability. NeuroImage 2009, 45:349-359.
63. Skipper J.I., van Wassenhove V., Nusbaum H.C., Small S.L. Hearing lips and seeing voices: How cortical areas supporting speech production mediate audiovisual speech perception. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17:2387-2399.
64. Soltysik D.A., Hyde J.S. Strategies for block-design fMRI experiments during task-related motion of structures of the oral cavity. NeuroImage 2006, 29(4):1260-1271.
65. Soltysik D.A., Hyde J.S. High spatial resolution increases the specificity of block-design BOLD fMRI studies of overt vowel production. NeuroImage 2008, (41):389-397.
66. van Wassenhove V., Grant K.W., Poeppel D. Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102(4):1181-1186.
67. Vitevitch M.S., Armbrüster J., Chu S. Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: Effects of phonotactic probability and onset density. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30(2):514-529.
68. Vitevitch M.S., Luce P.A. Increases in phonotactic probability facilitate spoken nonword repetition. Journal of memory and language 2005, 52:193-204.
69. Warrington E.K., Shallice T. The selective impairment of auditory short term memory. Brain 1969, 92:885-896.
70. Watkins K.E., Strafella A.P., Paus T. Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production. Electromyography 2003, 41:989-994.
71. Wechsler D. The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-third edition (WAIS-III) 1998, The Psychological Corporation.
72. Wilson S.M., Iacoboni M. Neural responses to non-native phonemes varying in producibility: Evidence for the sensorimotor nature of speech perception. Scanning 2006.
73. Wilson S.M., Saygin P., Sereno M.I. Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nature Neuroscience 2004, 3-4.
74. Yuen I., Davis M.H., Brysbaert M., Rastle K. Activation of articulatory information in speech perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 2-11.
75. Zheng Z., Munhall K., Johnsrude I. Functional overlap between regions involved in speech perception and in monitoring one's own voice during speech production. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22(8):1770-1781.