Increases in phonotactic probability facilitate spoken nonword repetition

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 193-204

  Vitevitch, Michael S ^a   Luce, Paul A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Duration; Naming latency; Neighborhood density; Phonotactic probability

Indexed keywords

EID: 13644283257     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. T.M. Bailey & U. Hahn Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? Journal of Memory and Language 44 2001 568-591
2. J.D. Cohen B. MacWhinney M. Flatt & J. Provost PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 25 1993 257-271
3. D. Crystal An encyclopedic dictionary of language and languages 1992 Blackwell London
4. G.S. Dell & J.K. Gordon Neighbors in the lexicon: Friends or foes In N.O. Schiller A.S. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities 2003 Mouton de Gruyter Berlin
5. C.A. Fowler Differential shortening of repeated content words produced in various communicative contexts Language and Speech 31 1988 307-319
6. S.A. Fritch N.R. Large & D.B. Pisoni Perception of wordlikeness: Effects of segment probability and length on the processing of nonwords Journal of Memory and Language 42 2000 481-496
7. S.E. Gathercole C.R. Frankish S.J. Pickering & S. Peaker Phonotactic influences on short-term memory Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25 1999 84-95
8. Gaygen, D. E. (1998). Effects of phonotactic probability on the recognition of words in continuous speech. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univ. at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
9. W.J. Gehring B. Goss M.G.H. Coles D.E. Meyer & E. Donchin A neural system for error-detection and compensation Psychological Science 4 1993 385-390
10. S.D. Goldinger T. Azuma M. Abramson & P. Jain Open wide and say "Blah!" Attentional dynamics of delayed naming Journal of Memory and Language 37 1997 190-216
11. D. Hale The relation of correct and error responses in a serial choice reaction task Psychonomic Science 13 1968 299-300
12. P.W. Jusczyk P.A. Luce & J. Charles-Luce Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language Journal of Memory and Language 33 1994 630-645
13. Lipinski, J., & Gupta, P. (2003). Separating the effects of duration and neighborhood density in nonword repetition latency. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the cognitive science society (p. 718). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
14. J. Lipinski & P. Gupta Does neighborhood density influence repetition latency for nonwords? Separating the effects of density and duration Journal of Memory and Language 52 2005 171-192
15. W.J.M. Levelt A. Roelofs & A.S. Meyer A theory of lexical access in speech production Brain and Behavioral Science 22 1999 1-75
16. P.A. Luce & N.R. Large Phonotactics, density, and entropy in spoken word recognition Language and Cognitive Processes 16 2001 565-581
17. R.D. Luce Response times 1986 Oxford University Press New York
18. S.L. Mattys P.W. Jusczyk P.A. Luce & J.L. Morgan Phonotactic and prosodic effects on word segmentation in infants Cognitive Psychology 38 1999 465-494
19. McLennan, C., & Luce, P.A. (in press). Examining the time course of indexical specificity effects in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
20. C.T. McLennan P.A. Luce & J. Charles-Luce Representation of lexical form Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29 2003 539-553
21. McLennan, C. T., Luce, P. A., & La Vigne, R. (2004). The role of non-adjacent phonotactic dependencies in the perception of spoken language. Presentation at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis, MN, November, 2004
22. J.L. Miller Effects of speaking rate on segmental distinctions In P.D. Eimas J.L. Miller (Eds.), Perspectives on the study of speech 1981 Erlbaum Associates NJ
23. K.R. Murphy & B. Myors Statistical power analysis: A simple and general model for traditional and modern hypothesis tests 1998 Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ
24. R.S. Newman J.R. Sawusch & P.A. Luce Effects of lexical neighborhood density on phoneme perception Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 1997 873-889
25. M.D. Pell Influence of emotion and focus location on prosody in matched statements and questions Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109 2001 1668-1680
26. M.A. Pitt & J.M. McQueen Is compensation for coarticulation mediated by the lexicon? Journal of Memory and Language 39 1998 347-370
27. L. Pylkkänen A. Stringfellow & A. Marantz Neuromagnetic evidence for the timing of lexical activation: An MEG component sensitive to phonotactic probability but not to neighborhood density Brain and Language 81 2002 666-678
28. R. Ratcliff & J.N. Rouder Modeling response times for two-choice decisions Psychological Science 9 1998 347-362
29. H.L. Storkel Learning new words: Phonotactic probability in language development Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44 2001 1321-1337
30. H.L. Storkel & M.A. Rogers The effect of probabilistic phonotactics on lexical acquisition Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 14 2000 407-425
31. B.G. Tabachnick & L.S. Fidell Using multivariate statistics 1989 Harper Collins Publishers
32. M.S. Vitevitch The neighborhood characteristics of malapropisms Language and Speech 40 1997 211-228
33. M.S. Vitevitch The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28 2002 735-747
34. M.S. Vitevitch The influence of sublexical and lexical representations on the processing of spoken words in English Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 17 2003 487-499
35. M.S. Vitevitch J. Armbrüster & S. Chu Sub-lexical and lexical representations in speech production: Effects of phonotactic probability and onset-density Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 30 2004 514-529
36. M.S. Vitevitch & P.A. Luce When words compete: Levels of processing in spoken word perception Psychological Science 9 1998 325-329
37. M.S. Vitevitch & P.A. Luce Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition Journal of Memory and Language 40 1999 374-408
38. M.S. Vitevitch P.A. Luce J. Charles-Luce & D. Kemmerer Phonotactics and syllable stress: Implications for the processing of spoken nonsense words Language and Speech 40 1997 47-62
39. M.S. Vitevitch P.A. Luce D.B. Pisoni & E.T. Auer Phonotactics, neighborhood activation, and lexical access for spoken words Brain and Language 68 1999 306-311
40. M.S. Vitevitch D.B. Pisoni K.I. Kirk M. Hay-McCutcheon & S.L. Yount Effects of phonotactic probabilities on the processing of spoken words and nonwords by postlingually deafened adults with cochlear implants Volta Review 102 2002 283-302
41. Vitevitch, M. S., & Rodríguez, E. (in press). Neighborhood density effects in spoken word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders
42. M.S. Vitevitch & M.S. Sommers The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults Memory & Cognition 31 2003 491-504
43. C.E. Wright Duration differences between rare and common words and their implications for the interpretation of word frequency effects Memory & Cognition 7 1979 411-419