Shortening cemented femoral implants. An in vitro investigation to quantify exeter femoral implant rotational stability vs simulated implant length

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 934-939

  Wilson, Lance J ^a   Roe, John A ^a   Pearcy, Mark J ^a   Crawford, Ross W ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Femoral implant; Implant design; Preclinical testing; Rotational stability

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE PROSTHESIS; CLIMBING; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMUR; IN VITRO STUDY; MECHANICAL TORSION; ROTATION; TORQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; BONE CEMENTS; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; LINEAR MODELS; MATERIALS TESTING; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; ROTATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 84861189804     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.10.012     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ling R.S.M., Charity J., Lee A.J.C., et al. The long-term results of the original Exeter polished cemented femoral component: a follow-up report. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:511.
2. Canadian Institute for Health Information Hip and knee replacements in Canada-Canadian Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR) 2008-2009 annual report 2009, CIHI, Ottawa, Ontario.
3. Kärrholm J, Garellick G, Rogmark C, et al. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: annual report 2007. In: Department of Ortopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital. 2008.
4. Puolakka T.J., Pajamäki K.J., Halonen P.J., et al. The Finnish Arthroplasty Register: report of the hip register. Acta Orthop Scand 2001, 72:433.
5. De Man F., Haverkamp D., Van der Vis H., et al. Small stem total hip arthroplasty in hypoplasia of the femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466:1429.
6. Rohrl S.M., Li M.G., Pedersen E., et al. Migration pattern of a short femoral neck preserving stem. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 448:73.
7. Westphal F.M., Bishop N., Honl M., et al. Migration and cyclic motion of a new short-stemmed hip prosthesis-a biomechanical in vitro study. Clin Biomech 2006, 21:834.
8. Sivananthan S., Arif M., Choon D.S.K. Small stem Exeter total hip replacement: clinical and radiological follow-up over a minimum of 2.5 years. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2003, 11:148.
9. Glyn-Jones S., Gill H.S., Beard D.J., et al. Influence of stem geometry on the stability of polished tapered cemented femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005, 87:921.
10. Decking R., Puhl W., Simon U., et al. Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems. Clin Biomech 2006, 21:495.
11. Shen G. FEMORAL STEM FIXATION: an engineering interpretation of the long-term outcome of Charnley and Exeter stems. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998, 80:754.
12. Bell C.G.R., Weinrauch P., Pearcy M., et al. In vitro analysis of Exeter stem torsional stability. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:1024.
13. Alfaro-Adrian J., Gill H.S., Marks B.E., et al. Mid-term migration of a cemented total hip replacement assessed by radiostereometric analysis. Int Orthop 1999, 23:140.
14. Howell J.R., Blunt L.A., Doyle C., et al. In vivo surface wear mechanisms of femoral components of cemented total hip arthroplasties: the influence of wear mechanism on clinical outcome. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:88.
15. Effenberger H., Heiland A., Ramsauer T., et al. A model for assessing the rotational stability of uncemented femoral implants. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2001, 121:60.
16. Stolk J.P., Janssen D.M., Huiskes R.P., et al. Finite element-based preclinical testing of cemented total hip implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 456:138.
17. Bergmann G., Deuretzbacher G., Heller M., et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 2001, 34:859.
18. Heller M.O., Bergmann G., Kassi J.P., et al. Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing. J Biomech 2005, 38:1155.
19. Stansfield B.W., Nicol A.C., Paul J.P., et al. Direct comparison of calculated hip joint contact forces with those measured using instrumented implants. An evaluation of a three-dimensional mathematical model of the lower limb. J Biomech 2003, 36:929.
20. Tai C.C., Nam H.Y., Abbas A.A., et al. First series of Exeter small stem primary total hip arthroplasty minimum 5 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:1200.
21. Gill H.S., Alfaro-Adrián J., Alfaro-Adrián C., et al. The effect of anteversion on femoral component stability assessed by radiostereometric analysis. J Arthroplasty 2002, 17:997.
22. Halliday B.R., English H.W., Timperley A.J., et al. Femoral impaction grafting with cement in revision total hip replacement. Evolution of the technique and results. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2003, 85:809.
23. Duncan W., Hubble M., Howell J., et al. Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique: a five- to 15-year review. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009, 91:577.
24. Mandziak D.G., Howie D.W., Neale S.D., et al. Cement-within-cement stem exchange using the collarless polished double-taper stem. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:1000.