The Long-Term Results of the Original Exeter Polished Cemented Femoral Component. A Follow-up Report

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 511-517

  Ling, Robin S M ^a   Charity, John ^a   Lee, A J Clive ^b   Whitehouse, Sarah L ^c   Timperley, A John ^a   Gie, Graham A ^a  

^a Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Exeter polished stems; long term survivorship; taper slip

Indexed keywords

CEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIERS ESTIMATE; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 65649112469     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Fowler J., Gie G.A., Lee A.J.C., et al. Experience with Exeter Hip since 1970. Orthop Clin North Am 19 (1988) 477
2. Timperley A.J., Gie G.A., Lee A.J.C., et al. The femoral component as a taper in cemented total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 75-B Suppl I (1993) 33
3. Shen G. Femoral stem fixation: an engineering interpretation of the long-term outcome of Charnley and Exeter stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80-B (1998) 754
4. Williams H.D.W., Browne G., Gie G.A., et al. The Exeter Universal cemented femoral component at 8-12 years-a study of the first 325 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84-B (2002) 324
5. Hook S., Moulder E., Yates P.J., et al. The Exeter Universal stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88-B (2006) 1584
6. Lewthwaite S., Squires B., Gie G.A., et al. The Exeter Universal hip replacement in patients 50 years or younger-10 to 17 years follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466 (2008) 324
7. Kobayashi S., Takaoka K., Saito N., et al. Factors affecting aseptic failure of fixation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty. Multivariate survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79 (1997) 1618
8. Sporer S.M., Callaghan J.J., Olejniczak B.A., et al. The effects of surface roughness and polymethylmethacrylate precoating on the radiographic and clinical results of the Iowa hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 81-A (1999) 481
9. Kaplan E.L., and Meier P. Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53 (1958) 457
10. Lettin A.W., Ware H.S., and Morris R.W. Survivorship analysis and confidence intervals. An assessment with reference to the Stanmore total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 73-B (1991) 729
11. Bland M. An introduction to medical statistics (1995), Oxford University Press, Oxford
12. Charnley J. Numerical grading of clinical results. Low Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip - Theory and Practice Berlin, Heidleberg, New York: Springer- Verlag; (3):20, 1979.
13. Gruen T.A., McNeice G., and Amstutz H.C. 'Modes of failure' of cemented stem-type femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141 (1979) 17
14. Weber F.A., and Charnley J. A radiological study of fractures of acrylic cement in relation to the stem of a femoral head prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 57B (1975) 297
15. Murray D.W., Carr J.A., and Bulstrode C. Survival analysis of joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75B (1993) 697
16. Lee A.J.C., Ling R.S.M., Gheduzzi S., et al. Factors affecting the mechanical and viscoelastic properties of acrylic bone cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med 13 (2002) 723
17. Miles A.W., Clift S.E., and Bannister G.C. The effect of the surface finish of the femoral component on load transmission in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72-B (1990) 736
18. Hustosky K.T., Norman T.L., Kish V.L., et al. The effect of creep on cement hoop stresses and axial displacement of a cemented femoral hip prosthesis in vitro. Trans Orthop Res Soc 21 (1996) 423
19. Wheeler J.P.G., Miles A.W., and Clift S. The influence of the stem-cement interface in total hip replacement: a comparison of experimental and finite element approaches. Proceedings of Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H. J Eng Med 211 (1997) 181
20. Hughes N., Gie G.A., Lee A.J.C., et al. The time dependent properties of bone cement and femoral component function. J Bone Joint Surg 79-B Suppl III (1997) 367
21. Lee A.J.C. The time dependent properties of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement: the interaction of the shape of femoral stems, surface finish and bone cement. In: Learmonth I.D. (Ed). Interfaces in total hip arthroplasty (1999), Springer Verlag, Berlin etc
22. Yoon Y., Oxland T., Hodgson A., et al. Structural behaviour of a bone-cement implant system under axial load: the effect of stem-cement bonding and geometrical factors. Trans 47th Annu Meet Orthop Res Soc 26 (2001) 1073
23. Crowninshield R.D., Brand R.A., Johnstone R.C., et al. The effect of femoral stem cross-sectional geometry on cement stresses in total hip reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 146 (1980) 71
24. Freeman M.A., and Plante-Bordeneuve P. Early migration and late aseptic failure of proximal femoral prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76-B (1994) 432
25. Malchau H. On the importance of stepwise introduction of new hip implant technology. PhD Thesis, University of Goteborg (1995)
26. Howell J.R., Blunt L.A., Doyle C., et al. In vivo surface wear mechanisms of femoral components of cemented total hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 19 (2004) 88