In Vivo Surface Wear Mechanisms of Femoral Components of Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasties: The Influence of Wear Mechanism on Clinical Outcome

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 88-101

  Howell, J R ^a,d   Blunt, L A ^b   Doyle, C ^c   Hooper, R M ^c   Lee, A J C ^c   Ling, R S M ^c  

^a ROYAL DEVON AND EXETER HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^d Old School   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cemented hip arthroplasty; Debris; Femoral stem; Micromotion; Wear

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ABRASION; ARTICLE; HIP PROSTHESIS; IN VIVO STUDY; MICROSCOPY; PARTICULATE MATTER; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 1642580585     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00278-X     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Aspenberg P, Van der Vis H: Migration, particles and fluid pressure: a discussion of causes of prosthetic loosening. Clin Orthop 352:75, 1998
2. Harris WH: Osteolysis and particle disease in hip replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 65:113, 1994
3. Ingham E, Fisher J: Biological reactions to wear debris in total joint replacement. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H. J Eng Med 214:21, 2000
4. Karrholm J, Nivbrant B, Thanner J, et al: Radiostereometric evaluation of hip implant design and surface finish: micromotion of cemented femoral stems. Presented at the 67th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Orlando, March 15-19, 2000
5. Alfaro-Adrian J, Gill HS, Marks B, Murray DW: Cement migration after THR: A comparison of Charnley Elite and Exeter femoral stems using RSA. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:130, 1999
6. O'Connor DO, Burke DW, Sedlacek RC, Lozvnsky AJ: Cement/bone vs. implant/bone micromotion on autopsy retrieved cemented femoral components. Trans Orthop Res Soc 18:248, 1993
7. Hutchings IM: Wear by hard particles, p. 133. In Hutchings IM (ed): Tribology: Friction and wear of engineering materials. Arnold, London, 1992
8. Willert H-G, Ludwig J, Semlitsch M: Reaction of bone to methacrylate after hip arthroplasty: a long-term gross, light microscopic and scanning electron microscope study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:1368, 1974
9. Dobbs HS, Robertson JL: The incidence and significance of rub marks on the stem of removed total hip replacements. J Biomed Mater Res 17:83, 1983
10. Pazzaglia UE, Pedrotti L, Ramella R, Zatti G: An analysis of changes in the surfaces of metallic femoral components in hip prostheses: a study of 60 prostheses removed after 1-20 years. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 15:221, 1989
11. Anthony PP, Gie GA, Howie CR, Ling R: Localised endosteal bone lysis in relation to the femoral components of cemented hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:971, 1990
12. Hale DG, Lee AJC, Ling RSM, Hooper RM: Debris production by the femoral component in cemented total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73(suppl 1):18, 1991
13. Witt JD, Swann M: Metal wear and tissue response in failed titanium alloy total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:559, 1991
14. Lee AJC, Hooper RM, Ling RSM, et al: Fretting as a source of particulate debris in total joint arthroplasty. p. 82. In Turner-Smith AR (ed): Micromovement in orthopaedics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993
15. Shardlow DL, Hailey JL, Ingham E, et al: Fretting wear of Charnley LFA stems: Patterns of wear and clinical significance. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79(suppl IV):458, 1997
16. Howell J, Blunt L, Ling RSM: An analysis of fretting damage seen on explanted femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81(suppl II):163, 1999
17. Blunt L, Jiang Q: Three dimensional measurement of the surface topography of ceramic and metallic orthopaedic joint prostheses. J Mater Sci 11:235, 2000
18. Stout KJ, Sullivan PJ, Dong WP, et al: Techniques and fidelity of data collection, pp. 17. In Stout KJ; Sullivan PJ; Dong WP, et al. (eds): The development of methods for the characterisation of roughness in three dimensions. University of Birmingham, Commission of the European Communities, Birmingham, UK, 1993.
19. Gruen TA, McNeice G, Amstutz HC: 'Modes of Failure' of cemented stem-type femoral components. Clin Orthop 141:17, 1979
20. Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Harris WH, et al: Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:161, 1990
21. Stout KJ, Sullivan PJ, Dong WP, et al: Integrated approach to micro-topography assessment. p. 11. In Stout KJ, Sullivan PJ, Dong WP, et al. (eds): The development of methods for the characterisation of roughness in three dimensions. University of Birmingham, Commission of the European Communities, Birmingham, UK, 1993.
22. Fitzpatrick R, Shortall E, Sculpher M, et al: Primary total hip replacement surgery: a systematic review of outcomes and modelling of cost effectiveness associated with different prostheses. Health Technol Assess 2:1, 1998
23. Malchau H, Herberts P, Soderman P, et al: Prognosis of total hip replacements: update and validation of results from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Registry 1979-1998. Presented at the 67th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Orlando, March 15-19, 2000.
24. Nevalainen J, Hirvonen A, Pulkinnen P: The 1997 Implant Yearbook on Orthopaedic Endoprostheses, Helsinki, National Agency for Medicines, 1997
25. Havelin LI, Engesoeter LB, Espehaug B, et al: The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 71:337, 2000
26. Engel L, Klingele H: Erosive wear. p. 186. In Engel L, Klingele H (eds): An atlas of metal damage. Carl Hauser Verlag, Munich, 1981
27. Hutchings IM: Fretting wear of metals. p. 109. In Hutchings IM (ed): Tribology: friction and wear of engineering materials. Arnold, London, 1992
28. Salvati EA, Betts F, Doty SB: Particulate metal debris in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 293: 160, 1993
29. Willert HG, Broback LG, Buchhorn GH, et al: Crevice corrosion of cemented titanium alloy stems in total hip replacements. Clin Orthop 333:51, 1996
30. Crowninshield RD, Jennings JD, Laurent ML, Maloney WJ: Cemented femoral component surface finish mechanics. Clin Orthop 355:90, 1998
31. st International Conference of Biomaterials, Beijing, China, July 24-26, 2001
32. Cook JE: Fretting wear of total hip replacement femoral stems. Doctoral Thesis, University of Exeter, Exeter, 1998
33. Berme N, Paul JP: Load actions transmitted by implants. J Biomed Eng 1:268, 1979
34. Duffy GP, Muratoglu OK, Biggs SA, Harris WH: The negative effect of proximal macrotexturing on the cement/metal interface of cemented femoral components: an experimental and clinical retrieval analysis. Trans Orth Res Soc 26:1076, 2001
35. Nizard RS, Sedel L, Christel R: Ten year survivorship of cemented ceramic-ceramic total hip prostheses. Clin Orthop 282:53, 1992
36. Hernigou P, le Mouel S: Do voids in a femoral cement mantle affect the outcome? J Arthroplasty 14:1005, 1999
37. Duffy GP, O'Connor DO, Lozynsky AJ, et al: The effect of surface finish on one cemented design of femoral component under simulated stair climbing loading conditions. Trans Orthop Res Soc 26:1001, 2001
38. Buly RL, Huo MH, Salvati E, et al: Titanium wear debris in failed cemented total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 7:315, 1992
39. Jasty M, Maloney WJ, Bragdon C, et al: The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:551, 1991
40. Ahmed AM, Nair R, Burke DL, Miller J: Transient and residual stresses and displacements in self-curing bone cement: part II: thermoelastic analysis of the stem fixation system. J Biomech Eng 104:28, 1982
41. Crawford RW, Evans M, Ling RSM, Murray DW: Fluid flow around model femoral components of differing surface finishes: in vitro investigations. Acta Orthop Scand 70:589, 1999
42. Davies JP, Tse M: Non-destructive testing of bonding and debonding of cemented femoral components in vitro. Trans Orthop Res Soc 16:359, 1992
43. Fornasier VL, Cameron HU: The femoral stem-cement interface in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 116:248, 1976
44. Verdonschot N, Huiskes R: Surface roughness of straight tapered stems in cemented THA reduces subsidence but not cement damage. Biomaterials 19: 1773, 1998
45. Wang JS, Franzen H, Lidgren L: Interface gap after implantation of a cemented femoral stem in pigs. Acta Orthop Scand 70:234, 1999
46. Fowler J, Gie GA, Lee AJC, Ling RSM: Experience with Exeter hip since 1970. Orthop Clin N Am 19: 477, 1988
47. Schulte KR, Callaghan JJ, Kelley SS, Johnston RC: The outcome of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement after a minimum twenty-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:961, 1993
48. Timperley AJ, Gie GA, Lee AJC, Ling RSM: The femoral component as a taper in cemented total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75(suppl 1):33, 1993
49. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Ilstrup DM: The natural history of debonding of the femoral component from the cement and its effect on long-term survival of Charnley total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:715, 1998
50. Williams HDW, Browne G, Gie GA, et al: The Exeter Universal cemented femoral component at 8-12 years: a study of the first 325 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84, 2002
51. Ferrier GM, McEvoy A, Evans CE, Andrew JG: The effect of cyclic pressure on human monocyte-derived macrophages in vitro. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:755, 2000
52. Jeyam M, McEvoy A, Ferrier G, et al: Cyclical pressure and particles are synergistic in human macrophage activation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82(suppl 1):262, 2000
53. Sampathkumar K, Evans C, Jeyam M, et al: Cyclic pressure and particles on release of M-CSE, chemokines and PGE2 in vitro. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(suppl 3):354, 2001
54. Matthews JB, Mitchell W, Stone MH, et al: A novel three-dimensional tissue equivalent model to study the combined effects of cyclic mechanical strain and wear particles on the osteolytic potential of primary human macrophages in vitro: Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. J Eng Med 215:479, 2001
55. Crawford R, Gie GA, Ling R, et al: Femoral osteolysis and the incomplete cement mantle. J Bone Joint Surg Br (supp 13): 315, 2000
56. Dall DM, Learmonth ID, Solomon M, et al: Fracture and loosening of Charnley femoral stems: comparison between first-generation and subsequent designs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:259, 1993
57. Crawford RW, Gie GA, Ling RSM: An 8-10 year clinical review comparing matt and polished Exeter stems. Orthop Trans 22:40, 1998
58. Howie DW, Middleton RG, Costi K: Loosening of matt and polished cemented femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:573, 1998
59. Collis DK, Mohler CG: Loosening rates and bone lysis with rough finished and polished stems. Clin Orthop 355:113, 1998
60. Sporer SM, Callaghan JJ, Olejniczak BA, et al: The effects of surface roughness and polymethylmethacrylate precoating on the radiographic and clinical results of the Iowa hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:481, 1999
61. Meding JB, Nassif JM, Ritter MA: Long-term survival of the T-28 versus the TR-28 cemented total hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 15:928, 2000
62. Kerboull M: L'arthroplastie totale de hanche. Maîtrise Orthopédique 83:6, 1999
63. Kerboull L, Lefevre N, Hamadouche M, et al: Influence de l'etat de surface des implants fémoroux cimentés: étude statistique comparative à 9 ans de deux séries homogènes de arthroplasties totales de hanche. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Moteur 85(suppl 3):117, 1999