In Vitro Analysis of Exeter Stem Torsional Stability

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1024-1030

  Bell, Cameron Gordon Roodveldt ^a,b   Weinrauch, Patrick ^a,c   Pearcy, Mark ^a   Crawford, Ross ^a,b  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b Resources and Industry PB ^*

^c THE PRINCE CHARLES HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

debonding; polished double taper; torsional stiffness

Indexed keywords

CEMENT;

ARTICLE; DEVICE REMOVAL; IMPLANT; IN VITRO STUDY; RIGIDITY; TORSION;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TORSION, MECHANICAL;

EID: 34848884816     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.012     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Kotzar G.M., et al. Telemeterized in vivo hip joint force data: a report on two patients after total hip surgery. J Orthop Res 9 (1991) 5
2. Bergmann G., Deuretzbacher G., Heller M., et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 34 (2001) 7
3. Burke D.W., O'Connor D.O., Zalenski E.B., et al. Micromotion of cemented and uncemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Br (1991) 73
4. Mohler C.G., Callaghan J.J., Collis D.K., et al. Early loosening of the femoral component at the cement-prosthesis interface after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77 (1995) 9
5. Chang P.B., Mann K.A., and Bartel D.L. Cemented femoral stem performance. Effects of proximal bonding, geometry, and neck length. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1998) 355
6. Callaghan J.J., Fulghum C.S., Glisson R.R., et al. The effect of femoral stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented porous-coated total hip prostheses. Comparison of straight-stem and curved-stem designs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74 (1992) 6
7. Berzins A., Sumner D.R., Andriacchi T.P., et al. Stem curvature and load angle influence the initial relative bone-implant motion of cementless femoral stems. J Orthop Res 11 (1993) 5
8. Williams H.D.W., Browne G., Gie G.A., et al. The Exeter universal cemented femoral component at 8 to 12 years: a study of the first 325 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84-B (2002) 3
9. Fowler J.L., Gie G.A., Lee A.J., et al. Experience with the Exeter total hip replacement since 1970. The Orthopedic Clinics of North America 19 (1988) 3
10. Timperley A.J., Gie G.A., Lee A.J., et al. The femoral component as a taper in cemented total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74 Supp 1 (1993) 33
11. Alfaro-Adrian J., Gill H.S., and Murray D.W. Should total hip arthroplasty femoral components be designed to subside? A radiostereometric analysis study of the Charnley Elite and Exeter stems. J Arthroplasty 16 (2001) 5
12. Alfaro-Adrian J., Gill H.S., and Murray D.W. Cement migration after THR-a comparison of Charnley Elite and Exeter femoral stems using RSA. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81B (1999) 1
13. Howell Jr. J.R., Blunt L.A., and Doyle C. In vivo surface wear mechanisms of femoral components of cemented total hip arthroplasties: the influence of wear mechanism on clinical outcome. J Arthroplasty 19 (2004) 1
14. Anthony P.P., Gie G.A., Howie C.R., et al. Localised endosteal bone lysis in relation to the femoral components of cemented total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72 (1990) 6
15. Dobbs H.S., and Robertson J.L.M. The incidence and significance of rub marks on the stem of removed total hip replacements. J Biomed Mater Res (1983) 17
16. Morlock M., Schneider E., Bluhm A., et al. Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients. J Biomech 34 (2001) 7
17. Stefansdottir A., Franzen H., Johnsson R., et al. Movement pattern of the Exeter femoral stem-a radiostereometric analysis of 22 primary hip arthroplasties followed for 5 years. Acta Orthop Scand 75 (2004) 4