Finite element-based preclinical testing of cemented total hip implants

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 456, Issue , 2007, Pages 138-147

  Stolk, Jan ^a   Janssen, Dennis ^a   Huiskes, Rik ^b   Verdonschot, Nico ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; STRESS; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WALKING; HIP PROSTHESIS; MATERIALS TESTING;

BONE CEMENT;

BONE CEMENTS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; MATERIALS TESTING;

EID: 34247473450     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802ba491     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alfaro-Adrian J, Gill HS, Murray DW. Cement migration after THR: a comparison of Charnley elite and Exeter femoral stems using RSA. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:130-134.
2. Alfaro-Adrian J, Gill HS, Murray DW. Should total hip arthroplasty femoral components be designed to subside? A radiostereometric analysis study of the Charnley Elite and Exeter stems. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:598-606.
3. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, Duda GN. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech. 2001;34:859-871.
4. Chaboche JL. Continuum damage mechanics: Part 1 - General concepts. J Appl Mech. 1988;55:59-64.
5. Chaboche JL. Continuum damage mechanics: Part 2 - Damage growth, crack initiation, and crack growth. J Appl Mech. 1988;55:65-72.
6. de Borst R. Some recent developments in computational modelling of concrete fracture. Int J Fract. 1997;86:5-36.
7. Harris WH. Is it advantageous to strengthen the cement-metal interface and use a collar for cemented femoral components of total hip replacements? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;285:67-72.
8. Heller MO, Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Durselen L, Pohl M, Claes L, Haas NP, Duda GN. Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. J Biomech. 2001;34:883-893.
9. Herberts P, Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:111-121.
10. Huiskes R. Failed innovation in total hip replacement: diagnosis and proposals for a cure. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993;64:699-716.
11. Huiskes R, Verdonschot N, Nivbrant B. Migration, stem shape, and surface finish in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355:103-112.
12. Janssen D, Aquarius R, Stolk J, Verdonschot N. Finite-element analysis of failure of the Capital Hip designs. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1561-1567.
13. Jasty M, Maloney WJ, Bragdon CR, O'Connor DO, Haire T, Harris WH. The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:551-558.
14. Kärrholm J, Borssen B, Lowenhielm G, Snorrason F. Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:912-917.
15. Kärrholm J, Nivbrant B, Thanner J, Anderberg C. Radiostereometric evaluation of hip implant design and surface finish. Available at: http://www.jru.orthop.gu.se. Accessed October 24, 2006
16. Kawate K, Maloney WJ, Bragdon CR, Biggs SA, Jasty M, Harris WH. Importance of a thin cement mantle: autopsy studies of eight hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355:70-76.
17. Lee AJ. The time-dependent properties of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement: the interaction of shape of femoral stems, surface finish and bone cement. In: Learmoth ID, ed. Interfaces in Total Hip Arthroplasty. London, UK: Springer; 1999:11-20.
18. Lemaitre J. How to use damage mechanics. Nucl Eng Des. 1984;80:233-245.
19. Ling RSM. The use of a collar and precoating on cemented femoral stems is unnecessary and detrimental. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;285:73-83.
20. Malchau H, Herberts P, Ahnfelt L. Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden: follow-up of 92,675 operations performed 1978-1990. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993;64:497-506.
21. Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellick G, Soderman P, Eisler T. Prognosis of total hip replacement. Available at: http://www.jru.orthop.gu.se. Accessed October 24, 2006
22. Mann KA, Bartel DL, Wright TM, Ingraffea AR. Mechanical characteristics of the stem-cement interface. J Orthop Res. 1991;9:798-808.
23. Massoud SN, Hunter JB, Holdsworth BJ, Wallace WA, Juliusson R. Early femoral loosening in one design of cemented hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:603-608.
24. McGrath LR, Shardlow DL, Ingham E, Andrews M, Ivory J, Stone MH, Fisher J. A retrieval study of capital hip prostheses with titanium alloy femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:1195-1201.
25. Morlock M, Schneider E, Bluhm A, Vollmer M, Bergmann G, Muller V, Honl M. Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients. J Biomech. 2001;34:873-881.
26. Murphy BP, Prendergast PJ. Measurement of non-linear microcrack accumulation rates in polymethylmethacrylate bone cement under cyclic loading. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1999;10:779-781.
27. Murphy BP, Prendergast PJ. The relationship between stress, porosity, and nonlinear damage accumulation in acrylic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;59:646-654.
28. Norman TL, Thyagarajan G, Saligrama VC, Gruen TA, Blaha JD. Stem surface roughness alters creep induced subsidence and 'taperlock' in a cemented femoral hip prosthesis. J Biomech. 2001;34:1325-1333.
29. Race A, Miller MA, Clarke MT, Mann KA. Cement-implant interface gaps explain the poor results of CMW3 for femoral stem fixation: a cadaver study of migration, fatigue and mantle morphology. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:679-687.
30. Stauffer RN. Ten-year follow-up study of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:983-990.
31. Stolk J, Maher SA, Verdonschot N, Prendergast PJ, Huiskes R. Can finite element models detect clinically inferior cemented hip implants? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;409:138-150.
32. Stolk J, Verdonschot N, Cristofolini L, Toni A, Huiskes R. Finite element and experimental models of cemented hip joint reconstructions can produce similar bone and cement strains in pre-clinical tests. J Biomech. 2002;35:499-510.
33. Stolk J, Verdonschot N, Mann KA, Huiskes R. Prevention of mesh-dependent damage growth in finite element simulations of crack formation in acrylic bone cement. J Biomech. 2003;36:861-871.
34. Stolk J, Verdonschot N, Murphy BP, Prendergast PJ, Huiskes R. Finite element simulation of anisotropic damage accumulation and creep in acrylic bone cement. Eng Fract Mech. 2004;71:513-528.
35. Sylvain GM, Kassab S, Coutts R, Santore R. Early failure of a roughened surface, precoated femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:141-148.
36. Verdonschot N, Huiskes R. Dynamic creep behavior of acrylic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:575-581.
37. Verdonschot N, Huiskes R. Subsidence of THA stems due to acrylic cement creep is extremely sensitive to interface friction. J Biomech. 1996;29:1569-1575.
38. Verdonschot N, Huiskes R. The effects of cement-stem debonding in THA on the long-term failure probability of cement. J Biomech. 1997;30:795-802.
39. Viceconti M, Zannoni C, Pierotti L. TRI2SOLID: an application of reverse engineering methods to the creation of CAD models of bone segments. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1998;56:211-220.