The effect of students' affective characteristics on their success in physics lessons

Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 709-724

  Guzel, Hatice ^a   Islim, Uzeyir ^b  

^a SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Physics Teacher   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Interest in physics; Manner; Motivation; Physics education; Self sufficiency

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861175802     PISSN: 13087711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Ramizowski AJ. Designing instructional systems. New York: Nichols Publishing Company,1981.
2. House JD. Cognitive-motivational predictors of science achievement. Int J Insc Media 1993;20:155-163.
3. Bloom BS. Insan nitelikleri ve ogrenme, translated by D. A. Ozcelik. Milli Egitim, Print House, Ankara, Turkey, 1979 [in Turkish].
4. Schibeci RA. Attitudes to science: An update. Studies in Sci Educ 1984;11:26-59.
5. Abak A. Universite ogrencilerinin secilmiş duyussal karakteristiklerinin fizik basarilarina etkisi. Master Thesis, ODTUI, Ankara, Turkey, 2002 [in Turkish].
6. Turgut MF. Egitimde olcme ve degerlendirme metodlari. Saydam Printing, Ankara, 1992 [in Turkish].
7. Ozcelik DA. Test hazirlama kilavuzu. OSYM Publications, Ankara, 1989 [in Turkish].
8. Tekin H. Egitimde olcme ve degerlendirme. Daily News Web Ofset Tesisleri, Ankara, 1982 [in Turkish].
9. Ulgen G. Egitim Psikolojisi. Lazer Print House, Ankara, Turkey, 1994 [in Turkish].
10. Erden M, Akman Y. Egitim Psikolojisi. Arkadas Publications, Ankara, Turkey, 1995 [in Turkish].
11. Alsop S. Science education and affect. Int J of Sci Educ, 2003; 25:1043-1047 [in Turkish].
12. Randel B, Stevenson HW, Witruk E. Attitudes beliefs and mathematics achievement of German and Japanese high school students. Int J Behav Develop 2000;24:190-198.
13. Senemoglu N. Gelisim Ogrenme ve Ogretim-Kuramdan Uygulamaya. Gazi Print House, Ankara, Turkey, 2001 [[in Turkish].
14. Schibeci RA, Riley J P. Influence of students' backround and perceptions on science attitudes and achievement. J Res Sci Teach1986;23:177-187.
15. Willson VL, Ackerman C, Malave C. Cross-time attitudes, concept formation, and achievement in college freshman physics. J Res Sci Teach 2000;37:1112-1120.
16. Kaya Y. Effect of late coming during the lecture on the rate of learning performance. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:221-228.
17. Kaya Y. The effect of regulator and stiffener exercises for speaking mechanics on the stuttering education and therapy. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:253-268.
18. Kuzgun Y. Ilkogretimde Rehberlik. Nobel Yayin Distribution, Ankara, Turkey, 2000 [in Turkish].
19. O'Leary A. Self-efficacy and health. Behav Res Technol 1985;23:437-451.
20. Schunk DH. Peer-model attributes and children's achievement behaviors. J Educ Psychol 1989;79:54-61.
21. Askar P, Umay A. Ilkogretim matematik ogretmenligi ogretmen adaylarinin bilgisayarla ilgili oz yeterlik algisi. Hacettepe Univ Egit Fak Derg 2001;21:1-8 [in Turkish].
22. Compeau DR, Higgins CA. Computer self -efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly 1995;19:189-212.
23. Hill T, Smith ND, Mann MF. Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. J Appl Psychol 1987;72:307-313.
24. Bikmaz FH. Fen öǧretiminde oz yeterlik inanci olcegi. Egit Bil Uyg 2002;1:197-210 [in Turkish].
25. Capri B, Kan A. Ogretmen kisiler arasi oz yeterlik olceginin Turkce formunun gecerlik ve guvenirlik calismasi. Mersin Univ Egit Fak Derg 2006;2:48-61 [in Turkish].
26. Akbulut E. Muzik ogretmeni adaylarinin meslekleklerine iliskin ozyeterlik inanclari. Yuzuncu Yil Univ Egit Fak Derg 2006;3:34-44 [in Turkish].
27. Hamurcu Hinif ogretmeni adaylarinin fen ogretimine yonelik oz yeterlik inanclari. Egit Aras 2006; 24:112-122 [in Turkish].
28. Gurcan A. Bilgisayar oz yeterligi algisi ile bilissel ogrenme stratejileri arasindaki iliski. Egit Aras 2005;19:179-193 [in Turkish].
29. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1997.
30. Pajares F, Kranzler JH. Self efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem solving: Contemporary. Educ Psychol1995;20:426-443.
31. Pajares F. Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Rev Educ Res 1996;66:543-578.
32. Brody CM, Davidson N. Professional development for Cooperative Learning: Issues and Approaches.Albany NY: State University of New York Press,1998.
33. Moran T, Hoy AW. Teacher Efficacy: Capturing Elusive Construct. Teaching Teacher Educ 2001;17:783-805.
34. Rubeck ML, Enochs LG. A path analytic model of variables that influence science and chemistry teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy in middle school science teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Lake Geneva, WI, April, 1991.
35. Ashton PT, Webb RB. Teachers' sense of efficacy, classroom behavior andstudent achievement. In P. T. Ashton & R. B. Webb (Ed). Teachers' sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York and London: Longman, 1986.
36. Coladarci T. Teachers' sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. J Exp Educ 1992;60:323-337.
37. Gibson S, Dembo MH. Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. J Educ Psychol 1984;76:569-582.
38. Ross JA. Beliefs that make a difference: The origins and impacts of teacher efficacy. Paper presented at the Annual Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, June, 1994.
39. Tschannen-Moran M, Woolfolk Hoy A. Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching Teacher Educ 2001;17:783-805.
40. Czerniak CM, Lumpe AT. Relationship between teacher beliefs and science education reform. J Sci Teach Educ1996;7:247-266.
41. Guskey TR. Teacher efficacy, self-concept,and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching Teacher Educ 1988;4:63-69.
42. Stein MK, Wang MC. Teacher development and school improvement: The process of teacher change. Teaching Teacher Educ 1988;4:171-187.
43. Cubukcu Z, Girmen P. Ogretmen adaylarinin fen ogretimi oz yeterlik inanclari ile sosyal oz yeterlikleri arasindaki iliski. XIV. Ulusal Egitim Bilimleri Kongresinde Sunulmus Bildiri, Pamukkale Universitesi, Denizli, 28-30 Eylul, 2005 [in Turkish].
44. Ekici G. Egitim fakültesi ogrencilerinin ogretmenlik oz yeterlik inanclarini etkileyen faktorler. XIV. Ulusal Egitim Bilimleri Kongresinde Sunulmus Bildiri. Pamukkale University, September 28-30, 2005, Denizli, Turkey, 2005 [in Turkish].
45. Tekkaya C, Cakiroglu J, Ozkan O. Fen bilgisi ogretmen adaylari uzerine bir durum calismasi. Egit Bil 2002;27:15-21 [in Turkish].
46. Usluel-Kocak Y, Seferoglu SS. Ogretim elemanlarinin bilgi teknolojilerini kullanmada karsilastiklari engeller, coizum onerileri ve oz yeterlik algilari. Egit Bil Uyg 2004;6:143-157 [in Turkish].
47. Yaman S. Koray OC. Altuncekic A. Fen bilgisi ogretmen adaylarinin oz yeterlik inanc duzeylerinin incelenmesi uzerine bir arastirma. Türk Eǧit Bil Derg 2004;2:355-364 [in Turkish].
48. Yigit N. Developing presentation skills of student teachers through micro-teaching method. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2010;2:55-74.
49. Kubiatko M, Yilmaz H, Haláková Z. The attitudes of Slovak and Turkish high school students to the ICT used in biology according to gender and age differences. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2012;4:433-446.
50. Yavuzer Y, Koc M. Egitim fakültesi ogrencilerinin ogretmen yetkinlikleri uzerine bir degerlendirme. Nigde Univ Egit Fak Derg 2002;1:35-43 [in Turkish].
51. Goddard RD, Hoy WK, Woolfolk-Hoy AW. Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. Am Educ Res J 2000;37:479-507.
52. Kurbanoglu S. Oz yeterlik inanci ve bilgi profesyonelleri icin onemi. Bil Dunyasi 2004;5:137-152 [in Turkish].
53. Ozyurt O. Analysis of asynchronous dialogues to reveal the effect of discussions on learning programming languages by candidates of computer programmers. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:739-750.
54. Midgley C, Feldlaufer H, Eccles JS. Change in teacher efficacy and student self and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. J Educ Psychol 1989;81:247-258.
55. Saka AZ. The effect of the guided discussion method on student success in the teaching of physics. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:725-738.
56. Cepni S. Arastirma ve proje calismalarina giris (5th Ed.). Celepler Print House, Trabzon, 2010 [in Turkish].
57. Krapp A. Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learn Instruct 2000;12:383-409.
58. Schiefele U. Interest and learning from text. Sci Stud Reading 1999;3:257-280.
59. Haussler P. Measuring students' interest in physics-design and results of a cross-sectional study in the federal republic of Germany. Int J Sci Educ 1987;9:79-92.
60. Cepni S. Effects of computer supported instructional material (CSIM) in removing, students misconceptions about concepts: "Light, light source and seeing. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2009;1:51-83.
61. Haussler P, Hoffmann L. A curriculum frame for physics education: Developrnent, comparison with students' interests, and impact on students' achievement and self-concept. Sci Educ 2000; 84:689-705.
62. Keser OF. Identifying mental models in physics. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:183-190.
63. Aiken LR. Attitudes toward mathematics and science in Iranian middle school. School Sci Math 1979;79:229-321.
64. Uguroǧlu ME, Walberg HJ. Motivation and achievement: A quantitative synthesis. Am Educ Res J 1979;16:375-389.
65. Kremer BK, Walberg HJ. A synthesis of social and psychological influences on science learning. Sci Educ 1981;65:11-23.
66. Yilmaz B. The validity and reliability study of work motivation scale for Turkish population. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2012;4:197-204.
67. Ceyhun I. Evaluation of chemistry teaching in terms of teachers and students. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:469-486.
68. Simpson RD, Oliver JS. A summary of major infuences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Sci Educ 1990;74:1-8.
69. Tuncer M. Evaluation of practice teachers according to the views of teacher candidates. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2012;4:391-404.
70. Kilic E. Ogretmen adaylarinin bilgisayara yonelik oz yeterlik algilarinin farkli deiişkenler acisindan incelenmesi. Proceedings of Internat Conference on Educ Sci (ICES' 08), pp 468-472, Famagusta, North Cyprus. 23-25 June, 2008 [in Turkish].
71. Ozay Kose E, Hasenekoglu I. Misconceptions and alternative concepts in biology textbooks: Nucleic acids and protein synthesis. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:403-410.
72. Ekici G. Biyoloji ogretmenlerinin laboratuvar kullanimi oz yeterlik algilari. VII. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eǧitimi Kongresi, Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eǧitim Fakültesi, Bildiriler Cilt-I, Submissions Book. pp 226-230, 7-9 Eylul, Ankara, 2006.
73. Piskin Tunc M, Durmus S. Pre-service elementary school classroom and mathematics teachers' interpretations about the definition of angle concept. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2012;4:131-140.
74. Gunay Y, Cetin O, Hamurcu H. Fen ogretmenlerinin oz yeterlik inanclari ile problem cozme becerileri arasindaki iliski: Izmir orneklemi. Proceedings of Internat Conference on Educ Sci (ICES' 08), pp 868-877, Famagusta, North Cyprus. 23-25 June, 2008 [in Turkish].
75. Ekinci Vural D, Hamurcu H. Preschool teacher candidates' self efficacy beliefs regarding science teaching lesson and opinions about science. Elemen Educ Online 2008;7:456-467[in Turkish].
76. Tatar E. The effect of dynamic mathematics software on achievement in mathematics: The case of trigonometry. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2012;4:459-468.
77. Umay A. Ilkogretim matematik ogretmenligi programinin ogrencilerin matematige karsi ozyeterlik algisina etkisi. V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Egitimi Kongresi, Submissions Book, pp 1340-1345, 2002 [in Turkish].
78. Zembat R, Uyanik Balat G, Cinko M, Onkol L, Acar M. Anasinifindaki cocuklarin ailelerinin oz yeterlik duzeylerinin olculmesi. Proceedings of Internat Conference on Educ Sci (ICES' 08), pp 2074-2083, Famagusta, North Cyprus. 23-25 June, 2008 [in Turkish].
79. Tatar E. The effect of guided inquiry and open inquiry methods on teacher candidates' science process skills. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:669-680.
80. Yetim S. Analysis of analytic hierarchy process of some algebra factors affecting the vector space concept over a field definition. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2012;4:153-168.
81. Karamustafaoglu S. Chemistry teachers' levels of using teaching materials. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2010;2:255-268.
82. Uredi I. Ogretmen adaylarinin oz duzenleme stratejileri, motivasyonel inanclari ve akademik basarilari arasindaki iliskilerin incelenmesi. Proceedings of Internat Conference on Educ Sci (ICES' 08), Famagusta, North Cyprus, pp 2014-2022, 23-25 June, 2008 [in Turkish].
83. Dilmac O. Sinif ogretmenlerinin gorsel sanatlar dergisine yonelik oz yeterlilik duzeylerinin belirlenmesi. Proceedings of Internat Conference on Educ Sci (ICES' 08), pp 672-681, Famagusta, North Cyprus. 23-25 June, 2008 [in Turkish].
84. Demirtas H. Comert M. Ozer N. Ogretmen adaylarinin ogretmenlik meslegine yonelik tutumlari ile oz yeterlik algilari arasindaki iliski. Proceedings of Internat Conference on Educ Sci (ICES' 08), pp 622-631, Famagusta, North Cyprus. 23-25 June, 2008 [in Turkish].
85. TIMSS [online]. Retrieved July 26, 2006, from http://www.times.com,1999.
86. Multon KD, Brown SD, Lent RW. Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta analytic investigation. J Counsel Psychol 1991;38:30-38.
87. Metin M. The examinations of teachers' attitude towards performance assessment with respect to the different variables. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:269-284.
88. Calik M. How did creating a constructivist learning environment influence my graduate students' views? Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:1-13.
89. Senel Coruhlu T, Calik M, Cepni S. Effect of conceptual change pedagogies on students' alternative conceptions of electricity resistance and electricity current. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2012;4:141-152.
90. Tok H. Classroom instructional responsibilities and learner autonomy:A case study in Turkey. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:211-220.
91. Yesilyurt M. Meta-analysis of the computer assisted studies in physics: A sample of Turkey. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:173-182.
92. Koral O. The effectiveness of problem-based learning supported with computer simulations on academic performance about buoyancy. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:293-304.
93. Er Nas S, Calik M, Cepni S. Effect of different conceptual change pedagogies embedded within 5E model on grade 6 students' alternative conceptions of 'heat transfer'. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2012;4:177-186.