The effect of dynamic mathematics software on achievement in mathematics: The case of trigonometry

Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 459-468

  Tatar, Enver ^a  

^a ATATÜRK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Computer assisted instruction; Dynamic mathematics software; GeoGebra; Teaching of trigonometry

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861119512     PISSN: 13087711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Baki A. Ogrenen ve ogretenler icin bilgisayar destekli matematik. Ceren Publications, Istanbul, Turkey, 2002 [in Turkish].
2. Aydin E. The use of computers in mathematics education: a paradigm shift from "computer assisted instruction" towards "student programming. " Turkish Onl J Educ Technol 2005;4:27-34.
3. Wiest LR. The role of computers in mathematics teaching and learning. Comp Schools 2001;17:41-55.
4. Usun S. Bilgisayar Destekli Ogretimin Temelleri. Nobel Publications, Ankara, Turkey, 2004 [in Turkish].
5. Lavicza Z, Papp-Varga Z. Integrating GeoGebra into IWB-equipped teaching environments: preliminary results. Technol Ped Educ 2010;19:245-252.
6. Hohenwarter M, Jones K. Ways of linking geometry and algebra: the case of geogebra. Proc British Soc Res Learn Math 2007;27:126-131.
7. Hohenwarter M, Fuchs K. Combination of dynamic geometry, algebra and calculus in the software system GeoGebra. Proc Comp Alg Syst Dyn Geo Syst Math Teach Con 2004;128-133.
8. Karadag Z, McDougall D. Dynamic worksheets: visual learning with the guidance of Polya. MSOR Connec 2009;9:13-16.
9. Haciomeroglu ES, Bu L, Schoen RC, Hohenwarter M. Learning to develop mathematics lessons with GeoGebra. MSOR Connec 2009;9:24-26.
10. Edwards JA, Jones K. Linking geometry and algebra with geogebra. Math Teac 2006;194:28-30.
11. Hohenwarter M, Hohenwarter J, Kreis Y, Lavicza Z. Teaching and learning calculus with free dynamic mathematics software GeoGebra. Proceedings of International Conference in Mathematics Education, Monterrey, Mexico, 2008.
12. Baki A, Ozpi{dotless}nar I. Logo destekli geometri ogretimi materyalinin ogrencilerin akademik basarilarina etkileri ve ogrencilerin uygulama ile ilgili gorusleri. Cukurova Univ Egit Fak Derg 2007;3:153-163 [in Turkish].
13. Karakirik E, Durmus S. An alternative approach to logo-based geometry. Turkish Onl J Educ Technol 2005;4:3-16.
14. Butuner SO. Dinamik geometri yazilimlarindan cabri ile yansi{dotless}ma ve oteleme hareketlerinin ogretimi. Ilkogretim Onl 2010;9:6-10 [in Turkish].
15. Falcade R, Laborde C, Mariotti MA. Approaching functions: Cabri tools as instruments of semiotic mediation. Educ Stud Math 2007;66:317-333.
16. Guven B, Karatas I. Dinamik geometri yazilimi cabri ile geometri ogrenme: ogǧrenci gorusleri. Turkish Onl J Educ Technol 2003;2:67-78 [in Turkish].
17. Guven B, Karatas I. Dinamik geometri yazilimi cabri ile olusturmaci ogrenme ortami tasarimi: bir model. Ilkogretim Onl 2005;4:62-72.
18. Kosa T, Karakus F. Using dynamic geometry software Cabri 3D for teaching analytic geometry. Proc Soc Behav Sci 2010;2:1385-1389 [in Turkish].
19. Cepni S. Effects of computer supported instructional material (CSIM) in removing, students misconceptions about concepts: "Light, light source and seeing. " Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2009;1:51-83.
20. Choi-Koh SS. A student's learning of geometry using the computer. J Educ Res 1999;92:301-311.
21. Aktumen M, Kacar A. Bilgisayar cebiri sistemlerinin matematige yönelik tutuma etkisi. Hacettepe Univ Egit Fak Derg 2008;35:13-26 [in Turkish].
22. Klasa J. A few pedagogical designs in linear algebra with Cabri and Maple. Lin Alg Appl 2010;432:2100-2111.
23. Tuluk G, Kacar A. Bilgisayar cebiri sistemlerinin (BCS) fonksiyon kavraminin ogretiminde etkisi. Kastamonu Egit Derg 2007;15:661-674.
24. Machin MC, Rivero RD. Students' attitudes towards mathematics and computers when using derive in the learning of calculus concepts. Int J Comp Alg Math Educ 2002;9:259-283.
25. Vuong B, He Y, Hui SC. Towards a web-based progressive handwriting recognition environment for mathematical problem solving. Expert Syst Appl 2010;37:886-893.
26. Little C. Differentiation in three easy, GeoGebra-style, lessons. MSOR Connect 2009;9:27-30.
27. Kabaca T, Aktümen M. Using GeoGebra as an expressive modeling tool: discovering the anatomy of the cycloid's parametric equation. Proc Int J GeoGebra New Lang Third Millen 2010;1:63-81.
28. Durmus S. Matematikte ogrenme gucluklerinin saptanmasi uzerine bir calisma. Kastamonu Egit Derg 2004;12: 125-128 [in Turkish].
29. Tatar E, Okur M, Tuna A. Ortaogretim matematiginde ogrenme gucluklerinin saptanmasina yonelik bir calisma. Kastamonu Egit Derg 2008;16:507-516.
30. Kadi{dotless}oǧlu E, Kamali M. Genel Matematik. Kultur Egitim Vakfi Prit House, Erzurum, Turkey, 2009 [in Turkish].
31. Olkun S, Ucar ZT. Temel Matematik-II. Tekaǧaç Eylül Publication, Ankara, Turkey, 2006 [in Turkish].
32. Dikovic L. Applications GeoGebra into teaching some topics of mathematics at the college level. Comp Sci Inf Syst 2009;6:191-203.
33. Hohenwarter J, Hohenwarter M, Lavicza Z. Introducing dynamic mathematics software to secondary school teachers: the case of GeoGebra. J Comput Math Sci Teach 2008;28:135-146.
34. Liao YC. Effects of computer-assisted instruction on students achievement in Taiwan: A metaanalysis. Comp Educ 2007;48:216-233.
35. Ross JA, Bruce CD. Student achievement effects of technology-supported remediation of understanding of fractions. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol 2009;40:713-727.
36. Yesilyurt M. Meta-analysis of the computer assisted studies in physics: A sample of Turkey. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:173-182.
37. Bakar KA, Ayub AFM, Luan WS, Tarmizi RA. Exploring secondary school students' motivation using technologies in teaching and learning mathematics. Proced Soc Behav Sci 2010;2:4650-4654.
38. Tezer M, Kanbul S. Opinions of teachers about computer aided mathematics education who work at special education centers. Proc Soc Behav Sci 2009;2:390-394.
39. Baki A. Bilgisayar donani{dotless}mli{dotless} ortamda matematik öǧrenme. Hacettepe Univ Egit Fak Derg 2000;19:186-193.
40. Aktumen M, Kacar A. Ilkogretim 8. siniflarda harfli ifadelerle islemlerin ogretiminde bilgisayar destekli ogretimin rolu ve bilgisayar destekli ogretim uzerine ogrenci goruslerinin degerlendirilmesi. Kastamonu Egit Derg 2003;11:339-358.
41. Turhan K, Kurt B. Computer based medicine education: Improved skin segmentation using YCbCr color space. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2010;2:1-20.
42. Dikmenli M. Biology students'conceptual structures regarding global warming. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2010;2:21-38.
43. Koray O, Koksal MS, Hazer B. Simple production experiment of poly (3-hydroxy butyrate) for science laboratories and its importance for science process skills of prospective teachers. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2010;2:39-54.
44. Yigit N. Developing presentation skills of student teachers through micro-teaching method. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2010;2:55-74.
45. Sahin C, Calik M, Cepni S. Using different conceptual change methods embedded within 5E model: Asample teaching of liquid pressure. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2009;1:115-125.
46. Taleghani M, Ansari HR, Jennings P. Renewable energy education in sustainable architecture: lessons from developed and developing countries. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2010;2:111-131
47. Oztas F. The effects of educational gains of vocational school of health students on their environmental attitudes. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2010;2:147-159.
48. Azar A. A comparison of the effects of two physics laboratory applications with different approaches on student physics achievement. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2010;2:161-185.
49. Dikmenli M, Cardak O, Oztas F, Yakisan M. High school students' images of an environmental scientist. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2010;2:187-210.
50. Cardak O. The determination of the knowledge level of science students on energy flow through a word association test. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2009;1:139-155.
51. Demirbas A. Social, economic, environmental and policy aspects of biofuels. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2010;2:75-109.
52. Tatli ZH. Computer based education: Online learning and teaching facilities. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2009;1:171-181.
53. Tatar E. The effect of guided inquiry and open inquiry methods on teacher candidates' science process skills. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2010;3: 669-680.