Classroom instructional responsibilities and learner autonomy: A case study in Turkey

Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 211-220

  Tok, Hidayet ^a  

^a ZIRVE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Classroom instructional responsibilities; ELT; Learner autonomy; Prospective teacher

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861131598     PISSN: 13087711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Little D. Learner autonomy 1: Definitions. Issues and problems. Dublin, Ireland: Authentik, 1991.
2. Holec H. Autonomy in foreign language learning. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 1981.
3. Littlejohn A. Learner choice in language study. English Lang Teach J 1985;39:253-261.
4. Camilleri G. Learner autonomy: The teachers' views. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 1999.
5. Little D. Learner autonomy and second/foreign language learning. In: The guide to good practice for learning and teaching in languages, linguistics and area studies. LTSN Subject Centre for Languages, Linguistics and Area Studies, University of Southampton, 2002.
6. McCarthy CP. Learner training for learner autonomy on summer language courses. Internet TBSL J 1998; 4. http://iteslj.org/Techniques/McCarthy-Autonomy.html.
7. Benson P. Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman, 2001.
8. Sinclair B. Learner autonomy: The cross-cultural question. IATEFL Newsletter 1997;139:12-13.
9. Cotteral S. Promoting learner autonomy through the curriculum: principle for designing language courses. ELT J 2000;54:109-117.
10. MEB (Milli Egitim Bakanligi). The Turkish National Education Curriculum. The General principles regulating the Turkish national education system, Ankara, Turkey, 2001.
11. Kubiatko M, Vaculová I. Project-based learning: characteristic and the experiences with application in the science subjects. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:65-74.
12. Tatli ZH. Computer based education: Online learning and teaching facilities. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2009;1:172-181.
13. Taleghani M, Ansari HR, Jennings P. Renewable energy education in sustainable architecture: lessons from developed and developing countries. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2010;2:111-131
14. Karamustafaoglu S. Chemistry teachers' levels of using teaching materials. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2010;2:255-268.
15. Sahin C, Calik M, Cepni S. Using different conceptual change methods embedded within 5E model: Asample teaching of liquid pressure. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2009;1:115-125.
16. Cepni S. Effects of computer supported instructional material (CSIM) in removing, students misconceptions about concepts: "Light, light source and seeing. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2009;1:51-83.
17. Little D. Learning as dialogue: the dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System 1995;23:175-182.
18. Naizhao G, Yanling Z. An empirical investigation of learner autonomy in some EFL classes in China. AARE Conference paper abstracts, Melbourne, Australia, November 28-December 2, 2004.
19. Yero JL. Teacher thinking. Teacher's mind resources. 2002. From: www.TeachersMind.com.
20. Rueda R, Garcia E. Teachers' beliefs about reading assessment with Latino minority students. Research Report 9, Washington, DC: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning, 1994.
21. Bunts-Anderson K. Teachers' conceptions of language learning: out of class interactions. Proceedings of the Independent Learning Conference 2003, Published: September 20, 2004.
22. Yildirim O. Anadolu University ELT department students' readiness for learner autonomy. MA Thesis, Anadolu University, Eskisehir, Turkey, 2005.
23. Ozdere M. State supported provincial universities English language instructors' attitudes towards learner autonomy. MA Thesis, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey, 2005.
24. Wilson DM. The correlation between racial identity development and learner autonomy of African-American students. Doctoral dissertation, The Graduate School of Education and Human Development of the George Washington University, Washington, DC, 2004.
25. Yang ND. Exploring a new role for teachers: promoting learner autonomy. Syst 1998;26:127-135.
26. Karacaoglu OC, Burcu C. Ingiltere ve Turkiye egitim sistemlerinin karsilastirilmasi. Milli Egitim Dergisi 2002;155-156:125-128[in Turkish].
27. Demirel O. Avrupa Konseyi dil projesi ve Turkiye uygulamasi. Milli Egitim: Uc Aylik Egit Sos Bilim Dergisi 2005;167:45-52[in Turkish].
28. Lamb T. Learning independently, pedagogical and methodological implications of new learning environments. Proc of the Independent Learning Conference 2003, Published: Sept 20, 2004.
29. Sabanci S. ELF teachers'views on Learner Autonomy at Primary and Secondary State schools in Eskisehir. Unpublished MA Thesis, Institute of Educational Sciences, Anadolu University, Eskisehir, Turkey, 2007.
30. Camilleri G. Learner autonomy: the teachers' view. Graz: ECML/Council of Europe Publishing, 1999.
31. Little D. We're all in it together: Exploring the interdependence of teacher and learner autonomy. Paper presented at Autonomy 2000, University of Helsinki Language Centre, Sept 7-9, 2000.
32. Dam L. Learner autonomy: From theory to classroom practice. Dublin, Ireland: Authentik, 1995.
33. Lamb M. The consequence of inset. ELT J 1995;49:72-80.