Rethinking "Diversity" Through Analyzing Residential Segregation Among Hispanics in Phoenix, Miami, and Chicago

Professional Geographer

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 109-124

  Lukinbeal, Christopher ^a   Price, Patricia L ^b   Buell, Cayla ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

diversity; Hispanics; race; residential segregation; segregation indexes

Indexed keywords

CENSUS; LATINO PEOPLE; RACIAL SEGREGATION; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; URBAN POPULATION;

ARIZONA; CHICAGO; FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; ILLINOIS; MIAMI; PHOENIX; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84861118198     PISSN: 00330124     EISSN: 14679272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00330124.2011.583584     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Allen, J. P. 2002. The Tortilla-Mercedes Divide in Los Angeles. Political Geography, 21: 701-09.
2. Allport, G. 1954. The nature of prejudice, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Barnes, T. 2009. "Not only but also": Quantitative and critical geography. The Professional Geographer, 61: 292-300.
4. Benton-Short, L. and Price, M. 2008. "Migrants to the metropolis: The rise of immigrant gateway cities, an introduction". In Migrants to the metropolis: The rise of immigrant gateway cities, Edited by: Price, M. and Benton-Short, L. 1-22. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
5. Blalock, H. M. Jr. 1967. Toward a theory of minority-group relations., New York: Wiley.
6. Blumer, H. 1958. Race prejudice as a sense of group position. Pacific Sociological Review, 1: 3-7.
7. Bobo, L. D. and Tuan, M. 2006. Prejudice in politics: Group position, public opinion and the Wisconsin treaty rights dispute., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Brewer, M. B. and Brown, R. J. 1998. "Intergroup relations". In Handbook of social psychology., 4th ed, Edited by: Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T. and Lindzey, G. 554-94. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Camarillo, A. Blacks and Hispanics in urban America: Some comparative historical perspectives. Working Paper Series number 3. Stanford Center for Chicano Research,. Stanford, CA.
10. Carter, P. 2009. Geography, race, and quantification. The Professional Geographer, 61: 465-80.
11. Clark, W. A. V. and Blue, S. 2004. Race, class, and segregation patterns in U.S. immigrant gateway cities. Urban Affairs Review, 39(6): 667-88.
12. Conroy, S. and Heer, D. 2003. Hidden Hispanic homelessness in Los Angeles: The "Latino paradox" revisited. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25(4): 530-38.
13. Cortese, C., Falk, R. and Cohen, J. 1976. Further considerations on the methodological analysis of segregation indexes. American Sociological Review, 14(4): 630-37.
14. De Oliver, M. and Dawson-Muñoz, T. 1996. Place-not-race? The inadequacy of geography to address racial disparities. The Review of Black Political Economy, 25(2): 37-58.
15. Ellis, M. 2001. What future for whites? Population projections and racialised imaginaries in the U.S. International Journal of Population Geography, 7: 213-29.
16. Ellis, M. 2009. Vital statistics. The Professional Geographer, 61: 301-09.
17. Ellis, M. and Wright, R. 1998. When immigrants are not migrants: Counting arrivals of the foreign born using the U.S. Census. International Migration Review, 32(1): 127-44.
18. Ellis, M., Wright, R. and Parks, V. 2004. Work together, live apart? Geographies of racial and ethnic segregation at home and at work. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(3): 620-37.
19. Falk, W., Hunt, L. and Hunt, M. 2004. Return migrations of African-Americans to the South: Reclaiming a land of promise, going home, or both?. Rural Sociology, 69(4): 490-509.
20. García, M. 2007. "Refugees or economic immigrants? Immigration from Latin America and the politics of US refugee policy". In A companion to Latina/o studies, Edited by: Flores, J. and Rosaldo, R. 480-91. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
21. Giles, M. and Evans, A. 1986. The power approach to intergroup hostility. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30: 469-85.
22. Grieco, E. and Cassidy, R. 2001. Overview of race and Hispanic origin: Census 2000 brief, U.S. Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/cenbr01-1.pdf (last accessed 26 May 2010)
23. Haney-López, I. 2006. Colorblind to the reality of race in America. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 3: B6-B9. November
24. Hardwick, S. 2008. "Toward a suburban immigrant nation". In Twenty-first century gateways: Immigrant incorporation in suburban America, Edited by: Singer, A., Hardwick, S. and Brettell, C. 31-50. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
25. Hise, G. 2004. Border city: Race and social distance in Los Angeles. American Quarterly, 56(3): 545-58.
26. Hollinger, D. 1995. Postethnic America: Beyond multiculturalism., New York: Basic Books.
27. Huntington, S. 2004a. The Hispanic challenge. Foreign Policy, 141: 30-45.
28. Huntington, S. 2004b. Who are we? The challenges to America's national identity., New York: Simon and Schuster.
29. Iceland, J. and Nelson, K. 2008. Hispanic segregation in metropolitan America: Exploring the multiple forms of spatial assimilation. American Sociological Review, 73(5): 741-65.
30. Iceland, J., Weinberg, D. and Steinmetz, E. 2002. Racial and ethnic residential segregation in the United States: 1980-2000, Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, Series CENSR-3. U.S. Government Printing Office, Census Bureau Housing Patterns. http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/housing_patterns/pdf/paa_paper.pdf (last accessed 26 May 2010)
31. Jiménez, T. A. and Fitzgerald, D. 2007. Mexican assimilation: A temporal and spatial reorientation. Du Bois Review, 4(2): 337-54.
32. Jones, R. C. 2008. "Cultural retrenchment and economic marginality: Mexican immigrants in San Antonio". In Immigrants outside megalopolis: Ethnic transformation in the heartland, Edited by: Jones, R. C. 135-60. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
33. Kwan, M. and Schwanen, T. 2009. Quantitative revolution 2: The critical (re)turn. The Professional Geographer, 61: 283-91.
34. Lukinbeal, C., Arreola, D. D. and Lucio, D. D. 2010. Mexican urban Colonias in the Salt River Valley. Geographical Review, 100(1): 12-34.
35. Massey, D. and Denton, N. 1988. The dimensions of racial segregation. Social Forces, 67: 281-315.
36. Massey, D. and Denton, N. 1993. American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Mohan, G. and Mohan, J. 2002. Placing social capital. Progress in Human Geography, 26: 191-210.
38. Nagel, C. 2009. Rethinking geographies of assimilation. The Professional Geographer, 61: 400-07.
39. Oberle, A. and Arreola, D. 2008. Resurgent Mexican Phoenix. Geographical Review Vol. 98, 171-96.
40. Odem, M. 2008. "Unsettled in the suburbs: Latino immigration and ethnic diversity in metro Atlanta". In Twenty-first century gateways: Immigrant incorporation in suburban America, Edited by: Singer, A., Hardwick, S. and Brettell, C. 105-36. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
41. Park, R., Burgess, E. and McKenzie, R. 1925. The city., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. Passel, J. and Cohn, D. 2008. Immigration to play a lead role in future U.S. growth, Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. http://pewresearch.org/pubs/729/united-states-population-projections (last accessed 26 May 2010)
43. Pettigrew, T. 1998. Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49: 68-85.
44. Pettigrew, T. and Tropp, L. 2000. "Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings". In Reducing prejudice and discrimination, Edited by: Oskamp, S. 93-114. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. Pettigrew, T. and Tropp, L. 2006. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90: 751-83.
46. Portes, A. 2007a. The Latin nation: Immigration and the Hispanic population of the United States. Du Bois Review: Social Science and Research on Race, 4: 271-301.
47. Portes, A. 2007b. "The new Latin nation: Immigration and the Hispanic population of the United States". In A companion to Latina/o studies, Edited by: Flores, J. and Rosaldo, R. 15-24. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
48. Portes, A. and Schaefer, S. 2006. Revisiting the ethnic hypothesis: Miami twenty-five years later. CMD Working Paper #06-10, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University. http://cmd.princeton.edu/papers/wp0610.pdf (last accessed 26 May 2010)
49. Price, P. 2010. At the crossroads: Critical race theory and critical geographies of race. Progress in Human Geography, 34(2): 147-74.
50. Putnam, R. 2007. E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30: 137-74.
51. Quillian, L. 1995. Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review, 60: 586-611.
52. Quillian, L. 1996. Group threat and regional change in attitudes towards African Americans. American Journal of Sociology, 102: 816-60.
53. Ramírez, R. and de la Cruz, G. 2003. The Hispanic population in the United States: March 2002, Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
54. Roth, D. 2008. Cubans' share of Miami-Dade County population up again. The Miami Herald, 23: A1 September Shoer
55. Sigelman, L. and Welch, S. 1993. The contact yypothesis revisited: Black-white interaction and positive racial attitudes. Social Forces, 71: 781-95.
56. Singer, A. 2008. "Twenty-first-century gateways: An introduction". In Twenty-first-century gateways: Immigrant incorporation in suburban America, Edited by: Singer, A., Hardwick, S. W. and Brettell, C. B. 3-30. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
57. Skop, E. 2006. Mapping race and ethnicity: The influence of James Allen. Yearbook of the Association of Pacific Coast Geographers, 68: 94-104.
58. Skop, E. and Li, W. 2005. Asians in America's suburbs: Pattern and consequences of settlement. Geographical Review, 95: 167-88.
59. Stein, R., Post, S. and Rinden, A. 2000. Reconciling context and contact effects on racial attitudes. Political Research Quarterly, 53: 285-303.
60. Tropp, L. and Pettigrew, T. 2005a. Differential relationships between intergroup contact and affective and cognitive dimensions of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31: 1145-58.
61. Tropp, L. and Pettigrew, T. 2005b. Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16: 951-57.
62. U.S. Census Bureau. 2005. Facts for features: Hispanic Heritage Month 2005: September 15-October 15, 2005, Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/pdf/cb05-ff14--3.pdf (last accessed 19 May 2010)
63. White, M. 1986. Segregation and diversity: Measures in population distribution. Population Index, 52: 198-221.
64. Wilson, D., Beck, D. and Bailey, A. 2009. Neoliberal-parasitic economies and space-building: Chicago's Southwest side. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(3): 604-26.
65. Wilson, K. and Portes, A. 1980. Immigrant enclaves: An analysis of the labor market experience of Cubans in Miami. American Journal of Sociology, 86: 295-319.
66. Wright, R., Ellis, M. and Parks, V. 2005. Re-placing whiteness in spatial assimilation research. City & Community, 4: 111-35.
67. Wyly, E. 2009. Strategic positivism. The Professional Geographer, 61: 310-22.
68. Zentella, A. C. 2002. "Latin@languages and identities". In Latinos: Remaking America, Edited by: Suárez-Orozco, M. M. and Páez, M. M. 321-38. Berkeley: University of California Press.