Analysis of retrieved hip resurfacing arthroplasties reveals the interrelationship between interface hyperosteoidosis and demineralization of viable bone trabeculae

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1155-1161

  Breer, Stefan ^a   Krause, Matthias ^a   Busse, Björn ^a,b   Hahn, Michael ^a   Rüther, Wolfgang ^a   Morlock, Michael M ^c   Amling, Michael ^a   Zustin, Jozef ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c HAMBURG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

bone cement; hip arthroplasty; hyperosteoidosis; interface; trabeculae

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ADULT; BONE DEMINERALIZATION; BONE DENSITY; BONE MATRIX; BONE MINERALIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICROSCOPY; OSTEOID; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; TRABECULAR BONE;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE DENSITY; BONE RESORPTION; CALCIFICATION, PHYSIOLOGIC; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMUR; FIBROSIS; HUMANS; MACROPHAGES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEONECROSIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE;

EID: 84861101861     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: 1554527X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.22035     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Corten K, Ganz R, Simon JP, et al. 2011. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: current status and future perspectives. Eur Cell Mater 21: 243-258.
2. De Smet KA,. 2005. Belgium experience with metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 36: 203-213, ix.
3. Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ,. 2008. Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus. J Arthroplasty 23: 36-43.
4. Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Le Duff MJ,. 2004. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A: 1874-1877.
5. Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, et al. 2004. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 418: 87-93.
6. Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ulrich SD, et al. 2007. Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 465: 63-70.
7. O'Neill M, Beaule PE, Bin Nasser A, et al. 2009. Canadian academic experience with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 67: 128-131.
8. Marker DR, Seyler TM, Jinnah RH, et al. 2007. Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty 22: 66-71.
9. Steffen RT, Foguet PR, Krikler SJ, et al. 2009. Femoral neck fractures after hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 24: 614-619.
10. Zustin J, Krause M, Breer S, et al. 2010. Morphologic analysis of periprosthetic fractures after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92: 404-410.
11. Zustin J, Winter E,. 2009. Failed internal fixation due to osteonecrosis following traumatic periprosthetic fracture after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 80: 666-669.
12. Zustin J, Hahn M, Morlock MM, et al. 2010. Femoral component loosening after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol 39: 747-756.
13. Shimmin AJ, Bare J, Back DL,. 2005. Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 36: 187-193, ix.
14. Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, et al. 2007. The effects of technique changes on aseptic loosening of the femoral component in hip resurfacing. Results of 600 Conserve Plus with a 3 to 9 year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 22: 481-489.
15. Jacobs JJ, Hallab NJ,. 2006. Loosening and osteolysis associated with metal-on-metal bearings: a local effect of metal hypersensitivity? J Bone Joint Surg Am 88: 1171-1172.
16. Hallab NJ, Anderson S, Caicedo M, et al. 2004. Immune responses correlate with serum-metal in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19: 88-93.
17. Busse B, Hahn M, Niecke M, et al. 2008. Allocation of nonbirefringent wear debris: darkfield illumination associated with PIXE microanalysis reveals cobalt deposition in mineralized bone matrix adjacent to CoCr implants. J Biomed Mater Res A 87: 536-545.
18. Stea S, Savarino L, Toni A, et al. 1992. Microradiographic and histochemical evaluation of mineralization inhibition at the bone-alumina interface. Biomaterials 13: 664-667.
19. Lu JX, Huang ZW, Tropiano P, et al. 2002. Human biological reactions at the interface between bone tissue and polymethylmethacrylate cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med 13: 803-809.
20. Savarino L, Stea S, Ciapetti G, et al. 1995. Microstructural investigation of bone-cement interface. J Biomed Mater Res 29: 701-705.
21. Hahn M,. 1994. Quantitative analysis of the histological reactions at the interface and the surrounding bone tissue following the implantation of hip endoprostheses. In:, Barbosa MA, Campilho A, editors. Imaging techniques in biomaterials. North-Holland, Amsterdam, London, New York, Tokyo: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.; p 325-340.
22. Zustin J, Sauter G, Morlock MM, et al. 2010. Association of osteonecrosis and failure of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468: 756-761.
23. Zustin J, Amling M, Krause M, et al. 2009. Intraosseous lymphocytic infiltrates after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a histopathological study on 181 retrieved femoral remnants. Virchows Arch 454: 581-588.
24. Hinsch A, Vettorazzi E, Morlock MM, et al. 2011. Sex differences in the morphological failure patterns following hip resurfacing arthroplasty. BMC Med 9: 113.
25. Bullough P,. 2004. Hyperosteoidosis. In:, Bullough P, editor. Orthopaedic pathology. Philadelphia: Mosby. pp 208-209.
26. Devlin VJ, Einhorn TA, Gordon SL, et al. 1988. Total hip arthroplasty after renal transplantation. Long-term follow-up study and assessment of metabolic bone status. J Arthroplasty 3: 205-213.
27. Goldring SR, Schiller AL, Roelke M, et al. 1983. The synovial-like membrane at the bone-cement interface in loose total hip replacements and its proposed role in bone lysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65: 575-584.
28. Ryd L, Linder L,. 1989. On the correlation between micromotion and histology of the bone-cement interface. Report of three cases of knee arthroplasty followed by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Arthroplasty 4: 303-309.
29. Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, et al. 1987. Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res 2: 595-610.
30. Busse B, Hahn M, Soltau M, et al. 2009. Increased calcium content and inhomogeneity of mineralization render bone toughness in osteoporosis: mineralization, morphology and biomechanics of human single trabeculae. Bone 45: 1034-1043.
31. Roschger P, Plenk HJ, Klaushofer K, et al. 1995. A new scanning electron microscopy approach to the quantification of bone mineral distribution: backscattered electron image grey-levels correlated to calcium K alpha-line intensities. Scanning Microsc 9: 75-86 (discussion 86-88).
32. Skedros JG, Bloebaum RD, Bachus KN, et al. 1993. The meaning of graylevels in backscattered electron images of bone. J Biomed Mater Res 27: 47-56.
33. Skedros JG, Bloebaum RD, Bachus KN, et al. 1993. Influence of mineral content and composition on graylevels in backscattered electron images of bone. J Biomed Mater Res 27: 57-64.
34. Roschger P, Fratzl P, Eschberger J, et al. 1998. Validation of quantitative backscattered electron imaging for the measurement of mineral density distribution in human bone biopsies. Bone 23: 319-326.
35. Roschger P, Paschalis EP, Fratzl P, et al. 2008. Bone mineralization density distribution in health and disease. Bone 42: 456-466.
36. Jobke B, Burghardt AJ, Muche B, et al. 2011. Trabecular reorganization in consecutive iliac crest biopsies when switching from bisphosphonate to strontium ranelate treatment. PLoS One 6: e23638.
37. Girard J, Lavigne M, Vendittoli PA, et al. 2006. Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: a randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88: 721-7726.
38. Gore DR, Murray MP, Gardner GM, et al. 1985. Hip function after total vs. surface replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 56: 386-390.
39. Amstutz HC, Thomas BJ, Jinnah R, et al. 1984. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66: 228-241.
40. Ball ST, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC,. 2007. Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89: 735-741.
41. Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB,. 2005. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87: 167-170.
42. Amstutz HC, Grigoris P, Dorey FJ,. 1998. Evolution and future of surface replacement of the hip. J Orthop Sci 3: 169-186.
43. McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, et al. 1996. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the McMinn prothesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 329: S89-S98.
44. Jensen LN, Jensen JS, Gotfredsen K,. 1991. A method for histological preparation of undecalcified bone sections containing acrylic bone cement. Biotech Histochem 1: 82-86.
45. Hahn M, Vogel M, Delling G,. 1991. Undecalcified preparation of bone tissue: report of technical experience and development of new methods. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 418: 1-7.
46. Morberg P, Albrektsson T, Reigstad A, et al. 1993. A qualitative and quantitative study of retrieved femoral heads in three different types of resurface hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 8: 617-624.
47. Cooper DM, Erickson B, Peele AG, et al. 2011. Visualization of 3D osteon morphology by synchrotron radiation micro-CT. J Anat 219: 481-489.
48. Misof BM, Roschger P, Cosman F, et al. 2003. Effects of intermittent parathyroid hormone administration on bone mineralization density in iliac crest biopsies from patients with osteoporosis: a paired study before and after treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88: 1150-1156.
49. Konttinen YT, Takagi M, Mandelin J, et al. 2001. Acid attack and cathepsin K in bone resorption around total hip replacement prosthesis. J Bone Miner Res 16: 1780-1786.
50. Brown EM,. 1992. Kidney and bone: physiological and pathophysiological relationships. In:, Windhager EE, editor. Handbook of physiology: renal physiology. New York: Oxford University Press; p 1841-1916.
51. Teitelbaum SL,. 1984. Renal osteodystrophy. Hum Pathol 15: 306-323.
52. Blades MC, Moore DP, Revell PA, et al. 1998. In vivo skeletal response and biomechanical assessment of two novel polyalkenoate cements following femoral implantation in the female New Zealand White rabbit. J Mater Sci Mater Med 9: 701-706.
53. Burkandt A, Katzer A, Thaler K, et al. 2011. Proliferation of the synovial lining cell layer in suggested metal hypersensitivity. In Vivo 25: 679-686.
54. Willert HG, Ludwig J, Semlitsch M,. 1974. Reaction of bone to methacrylate after hip arthroplasty: a long-term gross, light microscopic, and scanning electron microscopic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56: 1368-1382.
55. Charnley J,. 1970. The reaction of bone to self-curing acrylic cement. A long-term histological study in man. J Bone Joint Surg Br 52: 340-353.