The Effects of Technique Changes on Aseptic Loosening of the Femoral Component in Hip Resurfacing. Results of 600 Conserve Plus With a 3 to 9 Year Follow-up

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 481-489

  Amstutz, Harlan C ^a   Le Duff, Michel J ^a   Campbell, Patricia A ^a   Dorey, Frederick J ^a  

^a JOINT REPLACEMENT INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

hip; metal on metal; resurfacing; surgical technique

Indexed keywords

METAL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; HIP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METAL IMPLANTATION; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SUCTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT DURATION; VALGUS DEFORMITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CEMENTATION; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION;

EID: 34249946018     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. In: Amstutz H.C. (Ed). Metal on metal hip prostheses: past performances and future directions (1996), Raven Publishers, Philadelphia S2
2. McMinn D., Treacy R., Lin K., et al. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the McMinn prothesis. Clin Orthop 329 Suppl (1996) S89
3. Wagner H., and Wagner M. Metal/metal articulating interfaces. Orthopedics 19 (1996) 749
4. Rieker C.B., Kottig P., Schon R., et al. Clinical wear performance of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties. In: Jacobs J., and Craig T.L. (Eds). Alternative bearing surfaces in total joint replacements (1998), ASTM, Conshohocken 144
5. Amstutz H., Beaule P., Dorey F., et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 86-A (2004) 28
6. Amstutz H.C., Schmalzried T.P., Noordin S., et al. The critical difference in hemi-surface replacement vs. total hip resurfacing: absence of a polyethylene acetabular component. 24th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials (1998) 447
7. Amstutz H.C., Campbell P., Kossovsky N., et al. Mechanism and clinical significance of wear debris-induced osteolysis. Clin Orthop (1992) 7
8. Doorn P.F., Mirra J.M., Campbell P.A., et al. Tissue reaction to metal on metal total hip prostheses. Clin Orthop (1996) S187
9. McKellop H., Park S.-H., Chiesa R., et al. In vivo wear of three types of metal on metal hip prostheses during two decades of use. Clin Orthop 329 Suppl (1996) S128
10. Anissian H.L., Stark A., Gustafson A., et al. Metal-on-metal bearing in hip prosthesis generates 100-fold less wear debris than metal-on-polyethylene. Acta Orthop Scand 70 (1999) 578
11. Beaulé P., Dorey F., Le Duff M., et al. Risk factors affecting early outcome of metal on metal surface arthroplasty of the hip in patients 40 years old and younger. Clin Orthop 418 (2004) 87
12. Beaulé P., Lee J., Le Duff M., et al. Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip: a biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 86-A (2004) 2015
13. Amstutz H., Beaulé P., and Le Duff M. Hybrid metal on metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Oper Tech Orthop 11 (2001) 1
14. Beaulé P., and Amstutz H. Surface arthroplasty of the hip revisited: current indications and surgical technique. In: Singha R. (Ed). Hip replacement: current trends and controversies (2002), Marcel Dekker, New York 261
15. Amstutz H.C., Thomas B.J., Jinnah R., et al. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66A (1984) 228
16. Ware J.E., Kosinski M., and Keller S.D. SF-12: how to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales (1998), Quality Metric Inc, Lincoln (RI)
17. Harris W.H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg 51A (1969) 737
18. Hedley A.K., Kabo M., Kim W., et al. Bony ingrowth fixation of newly designed acetabular components in a canine model. Clin Orthop 12 (1983)
19. Back D.L., Young D., and Shimmin A. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 (2005) 324
20. Daniel J., Pynsent P.B., and McMinn D. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86B (2004) 177
21. Treacy R., McBryde C., and Pynsent P. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 (2005) 167