Enhancing the role of participatory scenario planning processes: Lessons from Reality Check exercises

Futures

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 387-399

  Chakraborty, Arnab ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PLANNING PROCESS; REGIONAL PLANNING; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABILITY;

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; MARYLAND; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA];

EID: 79953162384     PISSN: 00163287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2011.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Klosterman R.E. Arguments For and Against Planning. Readings in Planning Theory 1996, 86-100. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. S. Fainstein, S. Campbell (Eds.).
2. Lindblom C.E. The Science of " Muddling Through" Public Administration Review 1959, 19(2):79-88.
3. Jacobs J. The Death and Life of the Great American Cities 1961, Random House, New York.
4. Friedmann J. Planning in the Public Domain 1987, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
5. Davidoff P. Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Readings in Planning Theory 2003, 210-223. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. S. Fainstein, S. Campbell (Eds.).
6. Krumholz N. A retrospective view of equity planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 1982, 41(3):298-304.
7. Sandercock L. Toward Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities 1998, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
8. Forester J. What Do Planning Analysts Do? Planning and Policy Analysis as Organizing, Planning in the Face of Power 1989, University of California Press, Berkeley.
9. Thomas J.M. Planning History and the Black Urban Experience: Linkages and Contemporary Implications. Journal of Planning Education and Research 1994, 14(1):1-11.
10. Harwood S.A. Environmental Justice on the Streets: Advocacy Planning as a Tool to Contest Environmental Racism. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2003, 23(1):24-38.
11. Brooks M. Planning Theory for Practitioners 2002, APA Planners Press, Chicago.
12. Baum H. Culture matters - but it shouldn't matter too much. Urban Planning in a Multicultural Society 2000, Praeger, Westport, CT. M. Burayidi (Ed.).
13. Hall P. Scenarios for Europe's cities. Futures 1986, 18:2-8.
14. Van Notten P.W.F., Rotmans J., Van Asselt M.B.A., Rothman D.S. An updated scenario typology. Futures 2003, 35(5):423-443.
15. Carlsson-Kanyama A., Dreborg K.H., Moll H.C., Padovan D. Participative backcasting: a tool for involving stakeholders in local sustainability planning. Futures 2008, 40:34-46.
16. Börjeson L., Höjer M., Dreborg K.H., Ekvall T., Finnveden G. Scenario types and techniques: towards a user's guide. Futures 2006, 38(7):723-739.
17. Myers D., Kitsuse A. Constructing the future in planning: a survey of theories and tools. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2000, 19:221-231.
18. Porter D.R. Downtown linkages 1985, Urban Land Inst.
19. Hunt J.D., Kriger D.S., Miller E.J. Current operational urban land-use - transport modeling frameworks: a review. Transport Reviews 2005, 25(3).
20. Landis J. The California urban futures model: a new generation of metropolitan simulation models. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 1994, 21(4):399-420.
21. Klosterman R.E. Guest editorial - an update on planning support systems. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2005, 32(4):477-484.
22. Rittel H.W.J., Webber M.M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 1973, 4:155-169.
23. AtKisson A. Developing indicators of sustainable community: lessons from sustainable Seattle. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 1996, 16:337-350.
24. Kissler G.R., Fore K.N., Jacobson W.S., Kittredge W.P., Stewart S.L. State strategic planning: suggestions from the oregon experience. Public Administration Review 1998, 58.
25. Grow R.J., Matheson A. Envision Utah: laying the foundation for quality development. Urban Land 2006, 65:63.
26. Barbanente A., Khakee A., Puglisi M. Scenario building for metropolitan Tunis. Futures 2002, 34:583-596.
27. Deal B., Chakraborty A. Cyber-physical planning support systems: advancing participatory decision-making in complex urban environments. International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management: Special Issue on Complex Systems 2010, vol. 16:1-15.
28. CMAP' s GO TO 2040 comprehensive planning campaign, 2009-11-05 23:57:58. http://www.goto2040.org/about.aspx.
29. Emery M. The power of community search conferences. After Atlantis: working, managing, and leading in turbulent times 1997, 149.
30. Bunker B.B., Alban B.T. Introduction to the special issue on large group interventions. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 2005, vol. 41:9-14.
31. Hopkins L.D., Zapata M. Engaging the Future: Forecasts, Scenarios, Plans, and Projects, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy 2007, Mass, Cambridge.
32. Hall P. Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century 2002, Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. third ed.
33. Krumholz N. Equitable approaches to local economic development, readings in planning theory. Readings in Planning Theory 1996, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. S. Fainstein, S. Campbell (Eds.).
34. Brody S.D., Godschalk D.R., Burby R.J. Mandating citizen participation in plan making: six strategic planning choices. Journal of the American Planning Association 2003, 69(3):245-264.
35. Avin U.P., Dembner J.L. Getting scenario-building right. Planning 2001, 67(11):22-27.
36. H. Morgan, L. Deuben, Planning at the speed of change, in: URISA Annual Conference/GIS In Addressing Conference Proceedings, 2005.
37. de Sousa Santos B. Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre: toward a redistributive democracy. Politics and Society 1998, 26:461-510.
38. L.D. Hopkins, Integrating knowledge about land use and the environment through use of multiple models, in: Paper Delivered at Arizona State University Conference, 2000.
39. Chermack T.J. Improving decision-making with scenario planning. Futures 2004, 36(3):295-309.
40. Whorisky P. Building Strategies To Map Out Growth, Washington Post. February 2005, 3:B01.
41. C. Walker, How D.C.'s Future Stacks Up, Baltimore (MD) Sun, February 3, 2005.
42. Regional Planning Part IV Baltimore-Washington-Annapolis Area, Maryland State Planning Commission, 1937.
43. On Wedges and Corridors, A General Plan for the Maryland-Washington Regional District, Montgomery County Planning Department, 1963.
44. Cohen J.R. Maryland's " Smart Growth": using incentives to combat sprawl. Urban Sprawl: Causes, Consequences, and Policy Responses 2002, 293-324. Urban Institute Press, Washington, DC. G. Squires (Ed.).
45. Shen Q., Zhang F. Land-use changes in a pro-smart-growth state: Maryland, USA. Environment and Planning A 2007, 39:1457-1477.
46. Howland M., Sohn J.Y. Has Maryland's priority funding areas initiative constrained the expansion of water and sewer investments?. Land Use Policy 2007, 24(1):175-186.