Robust plans and contingent plans

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 251-266

  Chakraborty, Arnab ^a   Kaza, Nikhil ^b   Knaap, Gerrit Jan ^c   Deal, Brian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

external forces; internal options; land use and transportation models; robust and contingent plans; strategic decision making; uncertainty

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECONOMETRICS; FUTURE PROSPECT; LAND USE PLANNING; METROPOLITAN AREA; PLANNING PRACTICE; PLANNING PROCESS; STRATEGIC APPROACH; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN HOUSING; URBAN PLANNING;

BALTIMORE; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; MARYLAND; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA];

EID: 79960718215     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2011.582394     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Andrews, C. J. (1992). Sorting out a consensus: Analysis in support of multiparty decisions. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 19(2), 189-204.
2. Bartholomew, K. (2005). Integrating land use Issues into transportation planning: Scenario planning. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. (Federal Highway Administration Cooperative Agreement No. DTFH61-03-H-00134).
3. Bartholomew, K. (2007). Land use-transportation scenario planning: Promise & reality. Transportation, 34, 397-412. (Pubitemid 47023685)
4. Bloom, M. J., & Menefee, M. K. (1994). Scenario planning and contingency planning. Public Productivity & Management Review, 17(3), 223-230.
5. Börjeson, L., Höjer, M., Dreborg, K. H., Ekvall, T., & Finnveden, G. (2006). Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user's guide. Futures, 38(7), 723-739. (Pubitemid 44138541)
6. Bradfield, R., Wright, G., Burt, G., Cairns, G., & van der Heijden, K. (2005). The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning. Futures, 37(8), 795-812. (Pubitemid 40829367)
7. Chakraborty, A. (2010). Scenario planning for effective regional governance: Promises and limitations. State and Local Government Review, 42(2), 156-167.
8. Chakraborty, A. (2011). Enhancing the role of participatory scenario planning process: Lessons from reality check exercises. Futures, 43(4), 387-399.
9. Chapin, F. S., Jr. (1965). Urban land use planning (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
10. Couclelis, H. (2005). Where has the future gone? Rethinking the role of integrated land-use models in spatial planning. Environment and Planning A, 37(8), 1353-1371. (Pubitemid 41115005)
11. Deal, B., & Pallathucheril, V. (2003, May). The Land Use Evolution and impact Assessment Model (LEAM): Will it play in Peoria? Proceedings from Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, Sendai, Japan.
12. Dewar, J. A. (2002). Assumption-based planning: A tool for reducing avoidable surprises. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13. Federal-Aid Highway Act Description. Urban transportation planning in the United States: An historical overview. Retrieved February 20, 2011, from http://tmip.fhwa.dot.gov/resources/clearinghouse/docs/utp/ch4.htm
14. Hall, P. (1986). Scenarios for Europe's cities. Futures, 18(1), 2-8.
15. Henry, D., & Stokes, Jr., K. (2006). Macroeconomic and industrial effects of higher natural gas prices. Retrieved February 20, 2011, from http://www.inforum.umd.edu/papers/otherstudies/2006/NatGasReptWebVersion3a.pdf
16. Hopkins, L. D. (2001). Urban development: The logic of making plans. Washington, DC: Island Press.
17. Hopkins, L. D., & Zapata, M. (2007). Engaging the future: Forecasts, scenarios, plans, and projects. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
18. Kahn, H. (1962). Thinking about the unthinkable. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
19. Kaza, N. (2006). Tyranny of the median and costly consent: A reflection on the justification for participatory urban planning processes. Planning Theory, 5(3), 255-270. (Pubitemid 44705972)
20. Kaza, N., & Hopkins, L. D. (2009). In what circumstances should plans be public? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(4), 491-502.
21. Kaza, N., & Knaap, G. (in press). Principles of planning for economists. In N. Brooks, K. Donaghy, & G. Knaap (Eds.), Oxford handbook of urban economics and planning (Chapter 2). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22. Knaap, G. J. (Ed.). (2001). Land market monitoring for smart urban growth. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
23. Knaap, G. J., & Frece, J. W. (2006). Smart growth in Maryland: Looking forward and looking back. Idaho Law Review, 43, 445-473.
24. Knaap, G. J., & Hopkins, L. (2001). The inventory approach to urban growth boundaries. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(3), 314-326. (Pubitemid 32736424)
25. Knaap, G. J., Hopkins, L. D., & Donaghy, K. (1998). Does planning matter? A framework for examining the logic and effects of land use planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18(1), 25-34. (Pubitemid 29121416)
26. Knaap, G. J., & Lewis, R. (2011). Regional planning for sustainability and hegemony of metropolitan regionalism. In E. Seltzer & A. Carbonell (Eds.), Regional Planning in America: Practice and prospect (pp. 176-221). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
27. Landis, J. D. (2008, July). To be or not to be Los Angeles.. Regional vision planning in the West 1995-2007. Presented at the ACSP-AESOP Conference, Chicago, IL.
28. Moats, J. B., Chermack, T. J., & Dooley, L. M. (2008). Using scenarios to develop crisis managers: Applications of scenario planning and scenario-based training. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(3), 397-424.
29. Munda, G. (2006). Social multi-criteria evaluation for urban sustain-ability policies. Land Use Policy 23(1), 86-94. (Pubitemid 43071721)
30. Myers, D., & Kitsuse, A. (2000). Constructing the future in planning: A survey of theories and tools. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(3), 221-231. (Pubitemid 30480585)
31. National Environmental Policy Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 4332. Retrieved February 20, 2011, from http://ceq.hss.doe.gov/nepa/regs/nepa/ nepaeqia.htm
32. Postma, T. J. B. M., & Liebl, F. (2005). How to improve scenario analysis as a strategic management tool? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(2), 161-173. (Pubitemid 40112251)
33. Quay, R. (2010). Anticipatory governance: A tool for climate change adaptation. Journal of American Planning Association, 76(4), 497-511.
34. Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4(2), 155-169.
35. Shipley, R. (2002). Visioning in planning: Is the practice based on sound theory? Environment and Planning A, 34(1), 7-22. (Pubitemid 34162018)
36. Smith, E. (2007). Using a scenario approach: From business to regional futures. In L. D. Hopkins & M. A. Zapata (Eds.), Engaging the future: Using forecasts, scenarios, plans, and projects (pp. 79-101). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
37. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (n.d.). Sustainable communities grant program. Retrieved February 20, 2011, from http://portal.hud.gov/portal/page/portal/HUD/program-offices/ sustainable-housing-communities/grant-program
38. Van der Heijden, K. (1996). Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
39. Wack, P. (1985). Scenarios: Uncharted waters ahead. Harvard Business Review 63(5), 73-89.