Crossover comparison of airway sealing pressures of 1.5 and 2 size LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Classic™ in children, measured with the manometric stability test

Paediatric Anaesthesia

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 668-672

  Karippacheril, John G ^a   Varghese, Elsa ^a  

^a KASTURBA MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

Author keywords

children; comparison; crossover; manometric stability; ProSeal LMA

Indexed keywords

SEVOFLURANE;

AIRWAY PRESSURE; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; FIBEROPTIC BRONCHOSCOPY; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; INFANT; LARYNGEAL MASK; MALE; MANOMETRY; MINOR SURGERY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCHOOL CHILD;

ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; BRONCHOSCOPY; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; FEMALE; FIBER OPTIC TECHNOLOGY; HUMANS; INFANT; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; MANOMETRY; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE;

EID: 79955482845     PISSN: 11555645     EISSN: 14609592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03554.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Brain AI, Verghese C, Strube PJ,. The LMA 'ProSeal'-a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84: 650-654. (Pubitemid 30229613)
2. Brimacombe J, Keller C,. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 104-109. (Pubitemid 30436683)
3. Shimbori H, Ono K, Miwa T, et al. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93: 528-531.
4. Goldmann K, Jakob C,. A randomized crossover comparison of the size 2 1/2 laryngeal mask airway ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway-Classic in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1605-1610. (Pubitemid 40712707)
5. Goldmann K, Jakob C,. Size 2 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover investigation with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 385-389. (Pubitemid 40352863)
6. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Garcia G,. A randomized non-crossover study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized children. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 827-830. (Pubitemid 41762386)
7. Goldmann K, Roettger C, Wulf H,. The size 1(1/2) ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 405-410. (Pubitemid 43152586)
8. Lardner DRR, Cox RG, Ewen A, et al. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)- Proseal and the LMA-Classic in ventilated children receiving neuromuscular blockade. Can J Anaesth 2008; 55: 29-35. (Pubitemid 351184060)
9. Rowbottom SJ, Simpson DL, Grubb D,. The laryngeal mask airway in children. A fibreoptic assessment of positioning. Anaesthesia 1991; 46: 489-491.
10. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Keller C,. A comparison of four methods for assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in paediatric patients. Pediatr Anesth 2001; 11: 319-321. (Pubitemid 32434158)
11. Hockings L, Heaney M, Chambers NA, et al. Reduced air leakage by adjusting the cuff pressure in pediatric laryngeal mask airways during spontaneous ventilation. Pediatr Anesth 2010; 20: 313-317.
12. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J,. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children. Pediatr Anesth 2005; 15: 229-234. (Pubitemid 40364749)
13. Maino P, Dullenkopf A, Keller C, et al. Cuff filling volumes and pressures in pediatric laryngeal mask airways. Pediatr Anesth 2006; 16: 25-30.
14. Goldmann K, Roettger C, Wulf H,. Use of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway for pressure-controlled ventilation with and without positive end-expiratory pressure in paediatric patients: a randomized, controlled study. Br J Anesth 2005; 95: 831-834. (Pubitemid 41762387)