Comparison of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)-Proseal™ and the LMA-Classic™ in ventilated children receiving neuromuscular blockade

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 29-35

  Lardner, David R R ^a   Cox, Robin G ^a   Ewen, Alastair ^a   Dickinson, Darren ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARYNGEAL MASK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STOMACH DISTENSION; AERATION; AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION; AUSCULTATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; COUGHING; CUFF; DECOMPRESSION; FIBEROPTIC BRONCHOSCOPY; INTERMITTENT POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATION; LARYNGOSCOPY; LARYNX; LARYNX SPASM; MANOMETRY; PEAK INSPIRATORY FLOW; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SORE THROAT; STRIDOR; VOICE CHANGE;

ANESTHETIC AGENT; ISOFLURANE; MIVACURIUM; MUSCLE RELAXANT AGENT; SEVOFLURANE;

EID: 38749112912     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03017594     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Brambrink AM, Meyer RR, Kretz FJ. Management of pediatric airway - anatomy, physiology and new developments in clinical practice (German). Anaesthesiol Reanim 2003; 28: 144-51.
2. Park C, Bahk JH, Ahn WS, Do SH, Lee KH. The laryngeal mask airway in infants and children. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 413-7.
3. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Boehler M, Puhringer F. Positive pressure ventilation with the ProSeal versus classic laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study of healthy female patients. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 1351-3.
4. Braun U, Zerbst M, Fullekrug B, et al. A comparison of the Proseal laryngeal mask to the standard laryngeal mask on anesthesized, non-relaxed patients (German). Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2002; 37: 727-33.
5. Agro F, Antonelli S, Mattei A. The proseal LMA: preliminary data. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 601-2.
6. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Fullekrug B, et al. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 289-95.
7. Stix MS, Borromeo CJ, O'Connor CJ Jr. Esophageal insufflation with normal fiberoptic positioning of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 1036-9.
8. Elwood T, Cox RG. Laryngeal mask insertion with a laryngoscope in paediatric patients. Can J Anaesth 1996; 43: 435-7.
9. Goudsouzian NG, Denman W, Cleveland R, Shorten G. Radiologic localization of the laryngeal mask airway in children. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 1085-9.
10. Keller C, Brimacombe J. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 262-6.
11. Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, Morris R. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 286-7.
12. Berman LS, Banner MJ, Blanch PB, Widner LR. A new pediatric respiratory monitor that accurately measures imposed work of breathing: a validation study. J Clin Monit 1995; 11: 14-7.
13. Jackson EA, Coates AL, Gappa M, Stocks J. In vitro assessment of infant pulmonary function equipment. Pediatr Pulmonol 1995; 19: 205-13.
14. Tsujimura Y. Downfolding of the epiglottis induced by the laryngeal mask airway in children: a comparison between two insertion techniques. Paediatr Anaesth 2001; 11: 651-5.
15. Goldmann K, Roettger C, Wulf H. The size 1 1/2 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 405-10.
16. Goldmann K, Jakob C. Size 2 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover investigation with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 385-9.
17. Goldmann K, Jakob C. A randomized crossover comparison of the size 2 1/2 laryngeal mask airway ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway-Classic in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1605-10.
18. Shimbori H, Ono K, Miwa T, Morimura N, Noguchi M, Hiroki K. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93: 528-31.
19. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Garcia G. A randomized non-crossover study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized children. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 827-30.
20. Finholt DA, Henry DB, Raphaely RC. Factors affecting leak around tracheal tubes in children. Can Anaesth Soc J 1985; 32: 326-9.
21. Goldmann K, Hoch N, Wulf H. Influence of neuromuscular blockade on the airway leak pressure of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (German). Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2006; 41: 228-32.
22. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Keller C. A comparison of four methods for assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in paediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth 2001; 11: 319-21.
23. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 104-9.