A cohort evaluation of the pediatric ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in 100 children

Paediatric Anaesthesia

Volumn 18, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 947-951

  Kelly, Fiona ^a   Sale, Steven ^a   Bayley, Guy ^a   Cook, Tim ^b   Stoddart, Peter ^a   White, Michelle ^a  

^a BRISTOL ROYAL HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL UNITED HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anesthesia; Children; Laryngeal mask airway; Pediatric; ProSeal

Indexed keywords

AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FOOD REGURGITATION; LARYNGEAL MASK; LARYNX SPASM; PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; AIR PRESSURE; ANESTHESIA, INHALATION; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COHORT STUDIES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; INFANT; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MEDICAL AUDIT; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE;

EID: 51349141355     PISSN: 11555645     EISSN: 14609592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02705.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Brain AI, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA 'ProSeal'- a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 2000 84 : 650 654.
2. Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anaesth 2005 52 : 739 760.
3. Shimbori H, Ono K, Miwa T et al. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children. Br J Anaesth 2004 93 : 528 531.
4. Goldmann K, Roettger C, Wulf H. The size 1(1/2) ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, crossover investigation with the classic laryngeal mask airway. Anesth Analg 2006 102 : 405 410.
5. Goldmann K, Jakob C. A randomized crossover comparison of the size 2 1/2 laryngeal mask airway ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway-Classic in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg 2005 100 : 1605 1610.
6. Goldmann K, Jakob C. Size 2 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover investigation with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth 2005 94 : 385 389.
7. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Garcia G. A randomized non-crossover study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized children. Br J Anaesth 2005 95 : 827 830.
8. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children. Pediatr Anesth 2005 15 : 229 234.
9. Wheeler M. ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in 120 pediatric surgical patients: a prospective evaluation of characteristics and performance. Pediatr Anesth 2006 16 : 297 301.
10. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2000 93 : 104 109.
11. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Fullekrug B et al. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients. Anesthesiology 2002 96 : 289 295.
12. The LMA Company. Paediatric Proseal LMA Instructions. Henley-on-Thames, Oxon, UK : The LMA Company, 2008.
13. Howath A, Brimacombe J, Keller C et al. Gum elastic bougie-guided placement of the ProSeal laryngeal mask. Can J Anaesth 2002 49 : 528 529.
14. Garcia-Aguado R, Vinoles J, Brimacombe J et al. Suction catheter guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital technique. Can J Anaesth 2006 53 : 398 403.
15. Teoh CY, Lim FS. The Proseal laryngeal mask airway in children: a comparison between two insertion techniques. Pediatr Anesth 2008 18 : 119 124.
16. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Barragan L et al. Bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway has higher first attempt success rate than the digital technique in children. Br J Anaesth 2006 96 : 238 241.
17. Kundra P, Deepak R, Ravishankar M. Laryngeal mask insertion in children: a rational approach. Paediatr Anaesth 2003 13 : 685 690.
18. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Alvarez M. Safety and efficacy of the laryngeal mask airway. A prospective survey of 1400 children. Anaesthesia 1996 51 : 969 972.
19. Cook TM, Gibbison B. Analysis of 1000 consecutive uses of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway by one anaesthetist at a district general hospital. Br J Anaesth 2007 99 : 436 439.
20. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Boehler M et al. Positive pressure ventilation with the ProSeal versus classic laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study of healthy female patients. Anesth Analg 2001 93 : 1351 1353.
21. Cook TM, McKinstry C, Hardy R et al. Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the Laryngeal Tube during anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth 2003 91 : 678 683.
22. Bagshaw O. The size 1.5 laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in paediatric anaesthetic practice. Paediatr Anaesth 2002 12 : 420 423.
23. Park C, Bahk JH, Ahn WS et al. The laryngeal mask airway in infants and children. Can J Anaesth 2001 48 : 413 417.
24. Gibbison B, Hersch P, Cook TM. Use of the size 1.5 Proseal™ laryngeal mask airway may be associated with high failure rates. Difficult Airway Society Annual Scientific Meeting, Portsmouth, UK, November 2007.
25. Lardner DR, Cox RG, Ewen A et al. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) - Proseal and the LMA-Classic in ventilated children receiving neuromuscular blockade. Can J Anaesth 2008 55 : 29 35.
26. von Goedecke A, Brimacombe J, Hormann C et al. Pressure support ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure ventilation with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized crossover study of anesthetized pediatric patients. Anesth Analg 2005 100 : 357 360.
27. Sinha A, Sharma B, Sood J. ProSeal as an alternative to endotracheal intubation in pediatric laparoscopy. Pediatr Anesth 2007 17 : 327 332.
28. Martlew RA, Meakin G, Wadsworth R et al. Dose of propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in children: effect of premedication with midazolam. Br J Anaesth 1996 76 : 308 309.