First principles of motivation to learn and e3-learning

Distance Education

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 175-185

  Keller, John M ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ARCS model; Computer assisted instruction; Learning objects; Motivation; Motivational objects; Pedagogical agents; Volition

Indexed keywords

EID: 46849119233     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01587910802154970     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.
2. Astleitner, H., & Keller, J.M. (1995). A model for motivationally adaptive computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Computing in Education, 27(30), 270-280.
3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
5. Baylor, A. (1999). Intelligent agents as cognitive tools for education. Educational Technology, 39(2), 373-382.
6. Berlyne, D.E. (1965). Motivational problems raised by exploratory and epistemic behavior. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 5). New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Chang, M.M., & Lehman, J. (2002). Learning foreign language through an interactive multimedia program: An experimental study on the effects of the relevance component of the ARCS model. CALICO Journal, 20(1), 81-98.
8. Chyung, Y., Winiecki, D., & Fenner, J.A. (1999). Evaluation of effective interventions to solve the dropout problem in adult distance education. In B. Collis & R. Oliver (Eds.), Proceedings of EDMEDIA 99, Eleventh World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 18, 2007, from http://coen.boisestate.edu/ychyung/edmedia.htm
9. Condry, J. (1977). Enemies of exploration: Self-initiated versus other-initiated learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(7), 459-477.
10. Corno, L. (2001). Volitional aspects of self-regulated learning. In B.J. Zimmerman & D.H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 191-226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row. Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
12. del Soldato, T., & du Boulay, B. (1995). Implementation of motivational tactics in tutoring systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 6(4), 337-338.
13. Duffy, T.M., Lowyck, J., & Jonassen, D.H. (1993). Designing environments for constructivist learning. New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. Dweck, C.S., & Leggett, E.L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.
15. Gollwitzer, P.M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493-503.
16. Keller, J.M. (1979). Motivation and instructional design: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Instructional Development, 2(4), 26-34.
17. Keller, J.M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 386-434). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Keller, J.M. (1984). The use of the ARCS model of motivation in teacher training. In K.S.A.J. Trott (Ed.), Aspects of educational technology: Volume XVII: Staff development and career updating (pp. 140-145). London: Kogan Page.
19. Keller, J.M. (1987a). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10.
20. Keller, J.M. (1987b). The systematic process of motivational design. Performance & Instruction, 26(9), 1-8.
21. Keller, J.M. (1999a). Motivation in cyber learning environments. Educational Technology International, 1(1), 7-30.
22. Keller, J.M. (1999b). Motivational systems. In H. Stolovitch & E. Keeps (Eds.), Handbook of human performance technology: Improving individual and organizational performance worldwide (2nd ed., pp. 373-394). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Keller, J.M. (2000, February). How to integrate learner motivation planning into lesson planning: The ARCS model approach. Paper presented at VII Semanario, Santiago, Cuba. Retrieved March 29, 2008, from http://mailer.fsu.edu/~jkeller/Articles/ Keller%202000%20ARCS%20Lesson%20Planning.pdf
24. Keller, J.M. (2008). An integrative theory of motivation, volition, and performance. Technology, Instruction, Cognition, and Learning, 6(2).
25. Keller, J.M., Deimann, M., & Liu, Z. (2005). Effects of integrated motivational and volitional tactics on study habits, attitudes, and performance. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Orlando, FL. Retrieved March 28, 2008, from http://mailer.fsu.edu/~jkeller/Articles/Keller,%20Deimann, %20Liu%20Effects%20of%20integrated.pdf
26. Kim, C.M., & Keller, J.M. (2008). Effects of motivational and volitional email messages (MVEM) with personal messages on undergraduate students' motivation, study habits and achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 36-51.
27. Kopp, T. (1982). Designing the boredom out of instruction. Performance & Instruction, 21(4), 23-27, 32.
28. Kuhl, J. (1987). Action control: The maintenance of motivational states. In F. Halisch & J. Kuhl (Eds.), Motivation, intention and volition (pp. 279-291). Berlin: Springer.
29. Maehr, M.L. (1976). Continuing motivation: An analysis of a seldom considered educational outcome. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 443-462.
30. Masie, E. (2002). Making sense of learning specifications & standards: A decision maker's guide to their adoption. Saratoga Springs, NY: The MASIE Center. Retrieved March 10, 2008, from http://www.masie.com/ standards/S3_Guide.pdf
31. McClelland, D.C. (1984). Motives, personality, and society: Selected papers. New York: Praeger.
32. Means, T.B., Jonassen, D.H., & Dwyer, R.M. (1997). Enhancing relevance: Embedded ARCS strategies vs. purpose. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 45(1), 5-18.
33. Merrill, M.D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 50(3), 43-59.
34. Mori, J., Prendinger, H., & Ishizuka, M. (2003). Evaluation of an embodied conversational agent with affective behavior. Paper presented at AAMAS-03, Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved March 28, 2008, from http://www.vhml.org/workshops/aamas2003/papers/mori/mori.pdf
35. Naime-Diffenbach, B. (1991). Validation of attention and confidence as independent components of the ARCS motivational model. Unpublished PhD thesis, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
36. Nicholls, J. (1984). Conceptions of ability and achievement motivation. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 1, pp. 39-68). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
37. Oh, S.Y. (2006). The effects of reusable motivational objects in designing reusable learning object-based instruction. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
38. Rezabek, R.H. (1994). Utilizing intrinsic motivation in the design of instruction. In Proceedings of selected research and development presentations at the 1994 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Washington, DC. Retrieved March 28, 2008, from Document Reproduction Service No. ED373751.
39. Skinner, B.F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
40. Small, R.V., & Gluck, M. (1994). The relationship of motivational conditions to effective instructional attributes: A magnitude scaling approach. Educational Technology, 34(8), 33-40.
41. Song, S.H., & Keller, J.M. (2001). Effectiveness of motivationally adaptive computer-assisted instruction on the dynamic aspects of motivation. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 49(2), 5-22.
42. Suzuki, K., & Keller, J.M. (1996). Creation and cultural validation of an ARCS motivational design matrix. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Japanese Association for Educational Technology, Kanazawa, Japan. Retrieved March 28, 2008, from http://mailer.fsu.edu/~jkeller/Articles/ Suzuki%20Keller%201996%20Validation%20of%20Matrix.pdf
43. Visser, J., & Keller, J.M. (1990). The clinical use of motivational messages: An inquiry into the validity of the ARCS model of motivational design. Instructional Science, 19(6), 467-500.
44. Wang, N., Johnson, W.L., Rizzo, P., Shaw, E., & Mayer, R.E. (2005). Experimental evaluation of polite interaction tactics for pedagogical agents. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 12-19). Retrieved March 28, 2008, from http://portal.acm. org/citation.cfm?id=1040830.1040845
45. Weiner, B. (Ed.). (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
46. White, R.W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297-333.
47. Woods, R.H. (2002). How much communications is enough in online courses?: Exploring the relationship between frequency of instructor-initiated personal email and learners' perceptions of and participation in online learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), 377-394.
48. Zimmerman, B.J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 73-86.
49. Zuckerman, M. (1971). Dimensions of sensation seeking. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36(1), 45-52.