A business model perspective for ICTs in public engagement

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 192-202

  Panagiotopoulos, Panagiotis ^a   Al Debei, Mutaz M ^b   Fitzgerald, Guy ^a   Elliman, Tony ^a  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JORDAN   (Jordan)

Author keywords

Case study; Citizen engagement; Digital governance; EGovernment business models; EParticipation; EPetitions; Value networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860387429     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Al-Debei M.M., Avison D. Developing a unified framework of the business model concept. European Journal of Information Systems 2010, 19(3):359-376.
2. Al-Debei M.M., El-Haddadeh R., Avison D. Defining the business model in the new world of digital business. 14th Americas Conference on Information Systems, (AMCIS'08), Toronto, Canada 2008.
3. Andersen K.V., Henriksen H.Z., Secher C., Medaglia R. Costs of e-Participation: The management challenges. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 2007, 1(1):29-43.
4. Anduiza E., Cantijoch M., Gallego A. Political participation and the internet. Information, Communication & Society 2009, 12(6):860-878.
5. Avgerou C. The significance of context in information systems and organizational change. Information Systems Journal 2001, 11(1):43-63.
6. Bingham L.B., Nabatchi T., O'Leary R. The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review 2005, 65(5):547-558.
7. Bouwman H., De Vos H., Haaker T. Mobile service innovation and business models 2008, Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg.
8. Callanan M. Institutionalizing participation and governance? New participative structures in local government in Ireland. Public Administration 2005, 83(4):909-929.
9. Carman C. The process is the reality: Perceptions of procedural fairness and participatory democracy. Political Studies 2010, 58(4):731-751.
10. Chadwick A., May C. Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the internet: "E-Government" in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance 2003, 16(2):271-300.
11. Chan C.M.L., Pan S.L. User engagement in e-Government systems implementation: A comparative case study of two Singaporean e-Government initiatives. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 2008, 17(2):124-139.
12. Chee W.P. A framework of ICT exploitation for e-Participation initiatives. Communications of the ACM 2008, 51(12):128-132.
13. Chesbrough H.W., Rosenbloom R.S. The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change 2002, 11(3):529-555.
14. Cordella A., Iannacci F. Information systems in the public sector: The e-Government enactment framework. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 2010, 19(1):52-66.
15. Currie W.L. The organizing vision of application service provision: A process-oriented analysis. Information and Organization 2004, 14(4):237-267.
16. Dawes S.S., Prefontaine L. Understanding new models of collaboration for delivering government services. Communications of the ACM 2003, 46(1):40-42.
17. Dubé L., Paré G. Rigor in information systems positivist case research: Current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quarterly 2003, 27(4):597-635.
18. Dutton W.H., Eynon R. Networked individuals and institutions: A cross-sector comparative perspective on patterns and strategies in government and research. The Information Society 2009, 25(3):198-207.
19. Dutton W.H., Helsper E.J., Gerber M.M. The internet in Britain: 2009 2009, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford.
20. Fedorowicz J., Gelinas U.J.J., Gogan J.L., Williams C.B. Strategic alignment of participant motivations in e-Government collaborations: The internet payment platform pilot. Government Information Quarterly 2009, 26(1):51-59.
21. Flak L.S., Rose J. Stakeholder governance: Adapting stakeholder theory to the e-Government field. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2005, 16:642-664.
22. Fountain J. Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change 2001, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
23. Gregor S. The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly 2006, 30(3):611-642.
24. Gronlund A. Emerging electronic infrastructures: Exploring democratic components. Social Science Computer Review 2003, 21(1):55-72.
25. Heeks R., Bailur S. Analyzing e-Government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly 2007, 24(2):243-265.
26. Irani Z., Elliman T., Jackson P. Electronic transformation of government in the U.K.: A research agenda. European Journal of Information Systems 2007, 16(4):327-335.
27. Jaeger P.T. Deliberative democracy and the conceptual foundations of electronic government. Government Information Quarterly 2005, 22(4):702-719.
28. Janssen M., Kuk G. e-Government business models for public service networks. International Journal of e-Government Research 2007, 3(3):54-71.
29. Janssen M., Kuk G. e-Government business models: Theory, challenges and research issues. e-Government diffusion, policy, and impact: Advanced issues and practices 2008, 1-12. IGI Global. M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.).
30. Janssen M., Kuk G., Wagenaar R.W. A survey of web-based business models for e-Government in the Netherlands. Government Information Quarterly 2008, 25(2):202-220.
31. Kim S., Kim H.J., Lee H. An institutional analysis of an e-Government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly 2009, 26(1):42-50.
32. Kumar N., Vragov R. Active citizen participation using ICT tools. Communications of the ACM 2009, 52(1):118-121.
33. Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act Retrieved 2010, 15/9, from. http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2009/ukpga_20090020_en_1.
34. Local E-Democracy National Project Barriers to e-Democracy: Local government experiences and responses 2005, Local E-Democracy National Project.
35. Lowndes V., Pratchett L., Stoker J. Local political participation: The impact of rules-in-use. Public Administration 2006, 84(3):539-561.
36. Macintosh A. Using information and communication technologies to enhance citizen engagement in the policy process. Promise and problems of eDemocracy: Challenges of online citizen engagement 2004, 19-142. OECD. J. Caddy, C. Vergez (Eds.).
37. Macintosh A., Coleman S., Schneeberger A. eParticipation: The research gaps. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on eParticipation, LNCS 5694 2009, 1-11. Springer-Verlag. A. Macintosh, E. Tambouris (Eds.).
38. Macintosh A., Malina A., Farrell S. Digital democracy through electronic petitioning. Advances in digital government 2002, 137-148. Springer, U.S. W.J. McIver, A.K. Elmagarmid (Eds.).
39. Macintosh A., Robson E., Smith E., Whyte A. Electronic democracy and young people. Social Science Computer Review 2003, 21(1):43-54.
40. Magretta J. Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review 2002, 80(5):86-92.
41. Meijer A., Thaens M. Alignment 2.0: Strategic use of new technologies in government. Government Information Quarterly 2010, 27(2):113-121.
42. Miller L. e-Petitions at Westminster: The way forward for democracy?. Parliamentary Affairs 2009, 62(1):162-178.
43. Miller L., Williamson A. Digital dialogues third phase report: August 2007 - August 2008 2008, Hansard Society.
44. Myers M.D., Newman M. The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization 2007, 17(1):2-26.
45. Norris D.F. Building the virtual state. or not?: A critical appraisal. Social Science Computer Review 2003, 21(4):417-424.
46. Nyholm I., Haveri A. Between government and governance - Local solutions for reconciling representative government and network governance. Local Government Studies 2009, 35(1):109-124.
47. Panagiotopoulos P., Sams S., Elliman T., Fitzgerald G. Do social networking groups support online petitions?. Transforming Government: People Process and Policy 2011, 5(1):20-31.
48. Peixoto T. Beyond theory: e-Participatory budgeting and its promises for e-Participation. European Journal of ePractice 2009, 7:55-63.
49. Rose W.R., Grant G.G. Critical issues pertaining to the planning and implementation of e-Government initiatives. Government Information Quarterly 2010, 27(1):26-33.
50. Rose J., Saebo O. Designing deliberation systems. The Information Society 2010, 26(3):228-240.
51. Saebo O., Rose J., Flak L.S. The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly 2008, 25(3):400-428.
52. Shafer S.M., Smith H.J., Linder J. The power of business models. Business Horizons 2005, 48(3):199-207.
53. Timmers P. Business models for electronic markets. Electronic Markets 1998, 8(2):3-8.
54. Tomkova J. e-Consultations: New tools for civic engagement or facades for political correctness?. European Journal of ePractice 2009, 7:45-55.
55. West D.M. e-Government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review 2004, 64(1):15-27.
56. Whyte A., Renton A., Macintosh A. e-Petitioning in Kingston and Bristol: Evaluation of e-Petitioning in the local e-Democracy National Project, Napier University 2005.
57. Yildiz M. e-Government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly 2007, 24(3):646-665.
58. Yin R. Case study research: Design and methods 2009, SAGE, California. 4th ed.