Perspective: Designing deliberation systems

Information Society

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 228-240

  Rose, Jeremy ^a   Sæbø, Øystein ^b  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

Author keywords

Deliberation systems; E participation; Political discussion forums; System design; System management

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951896341     PISSN: 01972243     EISSN: 10876537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01972241003712298     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aidemark, J. 2003. A knowledge perspective on e-democracy. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2739):319-24.
2. Aikens,G. S. 1998. A personal history of Minnesota electronic democracy, 1994. Journal of Government Information 25(1):1-9.
3. Ainsworth, S., C. Hardy, and B. Harley. 2005. Online consultation: E-democracy and e-resistance in the case of the development gateway. Management Communication Quarterly 19(1):120-45.
4. Avdic, A., K. Hedstrom, J. Rose, and A. Gronlund, eds. 2007. Understanding eParticipation: Contemporary PhD eParticipation research in Europe. Orebro, Sweden: Department of Business, Economics, Statistics and Informatics, Orebro University.
5. Bekkers, V. 2004. Virtual policy communities and responsive governance: Redesigning on-line debates. Information Polity 9(3/4):193-203.
6. Benbasat, I., D. K. Goldstein, and M. Mead. 1987. The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly 11(3):369-86.
7. Callanan, M. 2005. Institutionalizing participation and governance? New participative structures in local government in Ireland. Public Administration 83(4):909-29.
8. Carlitz, R. D., and R. W. Gunn. 2002. Online rulemaking: A step toward e-governance. Government Information Quarterly 19(4):389-405.
9. Chadwick, A. 2003. Bringing e-democracy back in - why it matters for future research on e-governance. Social Science Computer Review 21(4):443-55.
10. Coben, J. 2003. Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In Debates in contemporary political philosophy: An anthology, ed.D.Matravers, and J. E. Pike, 342-59. London: Routledge.
11. Dahlberg, L. 2001. The Internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society 4(4):615-633.
12. DiMaggio, P., E. Hargitta, W. R. Neuman, and J. P. Robinson. 2001. Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology 27(1):307-36.
13. Dutton, W. H., and R. Eynon. 2009. Networked individuals and institutions: A cross-sector comparative perspective on patterns and strategies in government and research. The Information Society 25(3):198-207.
14. Finn, K., and B. Detlor. 2002. Youth and electronic government: Towards a model of civic participation. Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce 3(3):191-209.
15. Fung, A. 2002. One city, two systems: Democracy in an electronic chat room in Hong Kong. Javnost-The Public 9(2):77-93.
16. Habermas, J. 1984. The theory ofcommunicative action. Cambridge: Polity.
17. Habermas, J. 1999. Three normative models of democracy: liberal, republican, procedural. In Questioning Ethics: Contemporary Debates in Philosophy, eds. R. Kearney and M. Dooley, 135-144. London: Routledge.
18. Hagemann, C. 2002. Participation in and contents of two Dutch political party discussion lists on the Internet. Javnost-The Public 9(2):61-76.
19. Held, D. 1996. Models of democracy. Oxford: Blackwell.
20. Hill, D. 2003. Communication for a new democracy: Indonesia's first online elections. Pacific Review 16(4):525-47.
21. Hudson-Smith, A., S. Evans, and M. Batty. 2005. Building the virtual city: Public participation through e-democracy. Knowledge, Technology & Policy 18(1):62-85.
22. Janssen, D., and R. Kies. 2005. Online forums and deliberative democracy. Acta Politica 40(3):317-35.
23. Jensen, J. L. 2003. Virtual democratic dialogue? Bringing together citizens and politicians. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age 8(1/2):29-47.
24. Koch, A. 2005. Cyber citizen or cyborg citizen: Baudrillard, political agency, and the commons in virtual politics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 20(2/3):159-75.
25. Macintosh, A., E. Robson, E. Smith, and A. Whyte. 2003. Electronic democracy and young people. Social Science Computer Review 21(1):43-54.
26. Masters, Z., A. Macintosh, and E. Smith. 2004. Young people and e-democracy: Creating a culture of participation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3183:15-22.
27. Nugent, J. D. 2001. If e-democracy is the answer, what's the question? National Civic Review 90(3):221-34.
28. Olsson, T., H. Sandstrom, and P. Dahlgren. 2003. An information society for everyone? Gazette: The International Journal for Communication Studies 65(4-5):347-63.
29. Paolillo, J. C., and D. Heald. 2002. Democratic participation in the discursive management of usenet. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 1040-1049.
30. Papacharissi, Z. 2002. The virtual sphere: The Internet as a public sphere. New Media and Society 4(1):9-27.
31. Papacharissi, Z. 2004. Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society 6(2):259-83.
32. Pateman, C. 1970. Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Paivarinta, T., and Ø ScebØ. 2006. Models of e-democracy. Communication of Association of Information Systems 17(1):818-40.
34. Ranerup, A. 1999. Factors affecting discussions in on-line forums in local government. SIGGROUP Bulletin 20(2):11-13.
35. Rose, J., and Ø ScebØ. 2005. Democracy squared: Designing on-line political communities to accommodate conflicting interests. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 17(2):133-68.
36. Stanley, J. W., and C. Weare. 2004. The effects of Internet use on political participation: Evidence from an agency online discussion forum. Administration Society 36(5):503-27.
37. ScebØ, Ø. 2006. Designing the e-democracy forum: Genres and models of e-democracy. PhD diss., Aalborg Univ. Denmark.
38. ScebØ, Ø., and T. Paivarinta. 2005. Autopoietic cybergenres for e-democracy? Genre analysis of a Web-based discussion board. HICSS. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 98c.
39. Xenakis, A., and A. Macintosh. 2005. Trust analysis of the U.K. E-voting pilots. Social Science Computer Review 23(3): 312-25.
40. Yin, R. K. 1994. Case study research, design and methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage.