Associating the magnitude of relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) with visual field indices in glaucoma patients

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 96, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 629-633

  Schiefer, Ulrich ^a   Dietzsch, Janko ^a   Dietz, Klaus ^a   Wilhelm, Bärbel ^b   Bruckmann, Anna ^a   Wilhelm, Helmut ^a   Kitiratschky, Veronique ^a   Januschowski, Kai ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b STZ Eyetrial at the Centre for Ophthalmology   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFFERENT PUPILLARY DEFECT; AGED; ARTICLE; DIFFERENTIAL LUMINANCE SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; LOSS VOLUME; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELATIVE AFFERENT PUPILLARY DEFECT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SWINGING FLASLIGHT TEST; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PREVALENCE; PUPIL DISORDERS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 84860219440     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: 14682079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300776     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Kalaboukhova L, Fridhammar V, Lindblom B. Relative afferent pupillary defect in glaucoma: a pupillometric study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007;85:519-25. (Pubitemid 47163113)
2. Lankaranian D, Altangerel U, Spaeth GL, et al. The usefulness of a new method of testing for a relative afferent pupillary defect in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2005;103:200-7; discussion 207-8.
3. Levatin P. Pupillary escape in disease of the retina or optic nerve. Arch Ophthalmol 1958;62:768-79.
4. Thompson HS. Afferent pupillary defects. Pupillary findings associated with defects of the afferent arm of the pupillary light reflex arc. Am J Ophthalmol 1966;62:860-73.
5. Thompson HS, Corbett JJ, Cox TA. How to measure the relative afferent pupillary defect. Surv Ophthalmol 1981;26:39-42. (Pubitemid 11052013)
6. Wilhelm H. Neuro-ophthalmology of pupillary function - practical guidelines. J Neurol 1998;245:573-83. (Pubitemid 28431890)
7. Wilhelm H, Peters T, Ludtke H, et al. The prevalence of relative afferent pupillary defects in normal subjects. J Neuroophthalmol 2007;27:263-7. (Pubitemid 350307644)
8. Schiefer U, Pascual JP, Edmunds B, et al. Comparison of the new perimetric "German Adaptive Threshold Estimation" (GATE) strategy with conventional full-threshold and SITA standard strategies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:488-94.
9. Dietzsch J, Grobbel J, Nevalainen J, et al. Comparison between age-corrected normative threshold values for the static stimulus sizes goldmann III and V, assessed with a new fast thresholding estimation (GATE). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:5355.
10. Schwabe R, Vonthein R, Ata N, et al. Modeling the hill of vision. In: Wall M, Mills RP, eds. Perimetry Update 2000/2001. The Hague/The Netherlands: Kugler Publications, 2001:S71-9.
11. Danesh-Meyer HV, Papchenko TL, Savino PJ, et al. Brightness sensitivity and color perception as predictors of relative afferent pupillary defect. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:3616-21. (Pubitemid 351261097)
12. Greenfield DS, Liebmann JM, Ritch R, et al Low Pressure Glaucoma Study Group. Visual field and intraocular pressure asymmetry in the low-pressure glaucoma treatment study. Ophthalmology 2007;114:460-5. (Pubitemid 46282951)
13. Hennessy AL, Katz J, Ramakrishnan R, et al. The utility of relative afferent pupillary defect as a screening tool for glaucoma: prospective examination of a large population-based study in a south Indian population. Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:1203-6.
14. Skorkovská K, Wilhelm H, Lüdtke H, et al. Relative afferent pupillary defect in glaucoma. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2011;228:979-83.
15. Jonas JB, Zäh FM, Naumann GOH. Quantitative pupillometry of relative afferent defects in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:479-80. (Pubitemid 20142515)
16. Kwon YH, Pereira ML, Anderson SC, et al. Quantitative correlation of elevated intraocular pressure with relative afferent pupillary defect change in unilateral glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2005;83:127-9.
17. Tatsumi Y, Nakamura M, Fujioka M, et al. Quantification of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness reduction associated with a relative afferent pupillary defect in asymmetric glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:633-7. (Pubitemid 46716533)
18. Chew SS, Cunnningham WJ, Gamble GD, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer loss in glaucoma patients with a relative afferent pupillary defect. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:5049-53.
19. Nakanishi Y, Nakamura M, Tatsumi Y, et al. Quantification of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness reduction associated with a relative afferent pupillary defect. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006;244:1480-4. (Pubitemid 44741260)
20. Younis AA, Eggenberger ER. Correlation of relative afferent pupillary defect and retinal nerve fiber layer loss in unilateral or asymmetric demyelinating optic neuropathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:4013-16.
21. Kerrison JB, Buchanan K, Rosenberg ML, et al. Quantification of optic nerve axon loss associated with a relative afferent pupillary defect in the monkey. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1333-41. (Pubitemid 32994879)
22. Brown RH, Zilis JD, Lynch MG, et al. The afferent pupillary defect in asymmetric glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:1540-3. (Pubitemid 17153245)
23. Johnson LN, Hill RA, Bartholomew MJ. Correlation of afferent pupillary defect with visual field loss on automated perimetry. Ophthalmology 1988;95:1649-55. (Pubitemid 19000627)
24. Lagreze WD, Kardon RH. Correlation of relative afferent pupillary defect and estimated retinal ganglion cell loss. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1998;236:401-4. (Pubitemid 28269032)
25. Castelbuono A, Rizzo FJ. Distributions of human photoreceptors, retinal ganglion cells and area of the striate cortex applied to goldmann field charts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36(Suppl):S455.
26. Thompson HS, Montague P, Cox TA, et al. The relationship between visual acuity, pupillary defect, and visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 1982;93:681-8. (Pubitemid 12120306)
27. Kardon RH, Haupert CL, Thompson HS. The relationship between static perimetry and the relative afferent pupillary defect. Am J Ophthalmol 1993;115:351-6. (Pubitemid 23081077)
28. Wilhelm H, Meilinger S, Apfelstedt E. Relation between relative afferent pupillary defect and suprathreshold automated perimetry. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 1997;210:365-9. (Pubitemid 27407717)
29. Bremner FD. Pupil assessment in optic nerve disorders. Eye (Lond) 2004;18:1175-81. (Pubitemid 39591800)
30. Chen Y, Wyatt HJ, Swanson WH, et al. Rapid pupil-based assessment of glaucomatous damage. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:471-81.
31. Feigl B, Mattes D, Thomas R, et al. Intrinsically photosensitive (melanopsin) retinal ganglion cell function in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:4362-7.
32. Kankipati L, Girkin CA, Gamlin PD. The post-illumination pupil response is reduced in glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:2287-92.
33. Dacey DM, Liao HW, Peterson BB, et al. Melanopsin-expressing ganglion cells in primate retina signal colour and irradiance and project to the LGN. Nature 2005;433:749-54. (Pubitemid 40292984)