The usefulness of a new method of testing for a relative afferent pupillary defect in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma

Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society

Volumn 103, Issue , 2005, Pages 200-208

  Lankaranian, Dara ^a   Altangerel, Undraa ^a   Spaeth, George L ^a   Leavitt, Jacqueline A ^b   Steinmann, William C ^a   Mills, Richard P ^c   Jones, Dan B ^c   Ing, Malcolm R ^c   Cibis, Gerhard W ^c   Flach, Allan J ^c   Eagle Jr , Ralph C ^c   Ferris, Frederick L ^c  

^a WILLS EYE HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFFERENT PUPILLARY DEFECT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; MAGNEFIER ASSISTED SWINGING FLASHLIGHT METHOD; MALE; OPTIC DISK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL REFLEX; PUPILLOGRAPHY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SWINGING FLASHLIGHT METHOD; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; OPTIC DISK; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PUPIL DISORDERS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 29944440694     PISSN: 15456110     EISSN: 15456110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:389-393.
2. Bergamin O, Zimmerman MB, Kardon RH. Pupil light reflex in normal and diseased eyes: diagnosis of visual dysfunction using waveform partitioning. Ophthalmology 2003;110:106-114.
3. Levatin P. Pupillary escape in disease of the retina or optic nerve. Arch Ophthalmol 1959;62:768-779.
4. Kawasaki A, Moore P, Kardon RH. Variability of the relative afferent pupillary defect. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;120:622-633.
5. Lagreze WD, Kardon RH. Correlation of relative afferent pupillary defect and estimated retinal ganglion cell loss. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1998;236:401-404.
6. Bell RA, Waggoner PM, Boyd WM, et al. Clinical grading of relative afferent pupillary defects. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:938-942.
7. Kawasaki A, Moore P, Kardon RH. Long-term fluctuation of relative afferent pupillary defect in subjects with normal visual function. Am J Ophthalmol 1996;122:875-882.
8. Cox TA. Pupillography of a relative afferent pupillary defect. Am J Ophthalmol 1986;101:320-324.
9. Cox TA. Initial pupillary constriction in the alternating light test. Am J Ophthalmol 1986;101:120-121.
10. Jonas JB, Zach FM, Naumann GO. Quantitative pupillometry of relative afferent defects in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:479-480.
11. Polansky JR, Juster RP, Spaeth GL. Association of the myocilin mt.1 promoter variant with the worsening of glaucomatous disease over time. Clin Genet 2003;64:18-27.
12. Bayer A, Harasymowycz P, Henderer JD, et al. Validity of a new disk grading scale for estimating glaucomatous damage: correlation with visual field damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133:758-763.
13. Henderer JD, Liu C, Kesen M, et al. Reliability of the disk damage likelihood scale. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:44-48.
14. Glazer-Hockstein C, Brucker AJ. The detection of a relative afferent pupillary defect. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;134:142-143.
15. Thompson HS, Corbett JJ, Cox TA. How to measure the relative afferent pupillary defect. Surv Ophthalmol 1981;26:39-42.
16. McCormick A, Bhola R, Brown L, et al. Quantifying relative afferent pupillary defects using a Sbisa bar. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:985-987.
17. Rosenberg ML, Oliva A. The use of crossed polarized filters in the measurement of the relative afferent pupillary defect. Am J Ophthalmol 1990;110:62-65.
18. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1982;100:135-146.
19. Kardon RH, Haupert CL, Thompson HS. The relationship between static perimetry and the relative afferent pupillary defect. Am J Ophthalmol 1993;115:351-356.
20. Folk JC, Thompson HS, Farmer SG, et al. Relative afferent pupillary defect in eyes with retinal detachment. Ophthalmic Surg 1987;18:757-759.
21. Peter E, Thomas R, Muliyil J. Brightness discrimination test is not useful in screening for open angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 1996;5:182-186.