Retinal nerve fiber layer loss in glaucoma patients with a relative afferent pupillary defect

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 5049-5053

  Chew, Shenton S L ^a   Cunnningham, William J ^a   Gamble, Greg D ^a   Danesh Meyer, Helen V ^a  

^a THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFFERENT PUPILLARY DEFECT; ARTICLE; BRIGHTNESS SENSITIVITY; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MACULAR THICKNESS; MACULAR VOLUME; MALE; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RED PERCEPTION; RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER THICKNESS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD SENSITIVITY; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBER; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; PUPIL DISEASE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETINA GANGLION CELL; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL FIELD;

CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PUPIL DISORDERS; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 77958144070     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4216     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Atkin A, Wolkstein M, Bodis-Wollner I, Anders M, Kels B, Podos SM. Interocular comparison of contrast sensitivities in glaucoma patients and suspects. Br J Ophthalmol. 1980;64(11):858-862.
2. Motolko MA, Phelps CD. Contrast sensitivity in asymmetric glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol. 1984;7(1):45-59.
3. Greenfield DS, Liebmann JM, Ritch R, et al. Visual field and intraocular pressure asymmetry in the low-pressure glaucoma treatment study (see comment). Ophthalmology. 2007;114(3):460-465.
4. Gugleta K, Orgul S, Flammer J. Asymmetry in intraocular pressure and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmologica. 1999;213(4):219-223.
5. Krupin T, Liebmann JM, Greenfield DS, et al. The low-pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study (LoGTS) study design and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(3): 376-385.
6. Wang JC, Gazzard G, Foster PJ, et al. Interocular asymmetry of visual field defects in primary open angle glaucoma and primary angle-closure glaucoma. Eye. 2004;18(4):365-368.
7. Graham SL, Klistorner AI, Grigg JR, Billson FA. Objective VEP perimetry in glaucoma: asymmetry analysis to identify early deficits. J Glaucoma. 2000;9(1):10-19.
8. Danesh-Meyer HV, Papchenko TL, Savino PJ, et al. Brightness sensitivity and color perception as predictors of relative afferent pupillary defect. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(8):3616-3621.
9. Thompson HS, Montague P, Cox TA, Corbett JJ. The relationship between visual acuity, pupillary defect, and visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;93(6):681-688.
10. Bickler-Bluth M, Trick GL, Kolker AE, Cooper DG. Assessing the utility of reliability indices for automated visual fields: testing ocular hypertensives. Ophthalmology. 1989;96(5):616-619.
11. Browning DJ, Fraser CM. Intraobserver variability in optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138(3):477-479.
12. Tatsumi Y, Nakamura M, Fujioka M, et al. Quantification of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness reduction associated with a relative afferent pupillary defect in asymmetric glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol.2007;91(5):633-637.
13. Brown RH, Zilis JD, Lynch MG, Sanborn GE. The afferent pupillary defect in asymmetric glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105(11): 1540-1543.
14. Kardon R, Anderson SC, Damarjian TG, et al. Chromatic pupil responses: preferential activation of the melanopsin-mediated versus outer photoreceptor-mediated pupil light reflex. Ophthalmology.2009;116(8):1564-1573.
15. Kawasaki A, Kardon RH, Kawasaki A, Kardon RH. Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells. J Neuroophthalmol. 2007; 27(3):195-204.
16. Lagreze WD, Kardon RH. Correlation of relative afferent pupillary defect and estimated retinal ganglion cell loss. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998;236(6):401-404.
17. Kardon RH, Haupert CL, Thompson HS. The relationship between static perimetry and the relative afferent pupillary defect. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115(3):351-356.