Brightness sensitivity and color perception as predictors of relative afferent pupillary defect

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 48, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 3616-3621

  Danesh Meyer, Helen V ^a   Papchenko, Taras L ^a   Savino, Peter J ^b   Gamble, Greg D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b WILLS EYE HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFFERENT PUPILLARY DEFECT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BRIGHTNESS; COLOR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; LIGHT; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PUPIL DISEASE; ROC CURVE; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; COLOR PERCEPTION; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIGHT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PUPIL DISORDERS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 34648823257     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-1076     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Levatin P. Pupillary escape in disease of the retina or optic nerve. Arch Ophthalmol. 1959;62:768-779.
2. Thompson HS, Corbett JJ, Cox TA. How to measure the relative afferent pupillary defect. Surv Ophthalmol. 1981;26:39-42.
3. Lam BL, Thompson HS. Brightness sense and the relative afferent pupillary defect. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108:462-463.
4. Browning DJ, Buckley EG. Reliability of brightness comparison testing in predicting afferent pupillary defects. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:341-343.
5. Preston DS, Bernstein L, Sadun AA. Office techniques for detecting optic neuropathies. Neuro-ophthalmology. 1988;8:245-250.
6. Sadun AA, Lessell S. Brightness-sense and optic nerve disease. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103:39-43.
7. Tanner V, Tregear SJ, Ripley LG, Vickers SF. Automated achromatic contrast and chromatic discrimination sensitivity testing in dysthyroid optic neuropathy. Eye. 1995;9(pt 3):352-357.
8. Volpe NJ, Plotkin ES, Maguire MG, Hariprasad R, Galetta SL. Portable pupillography of the swinging flashlight test to detect afferent pupillary defects. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1913-1921; discussion 1922.
9. Wilhelm B, Ludtke H, Peters T, Schmid R, Wilhelm H, Zrenner E. [Automated swinging flashlight test in patients with optic nerve diseases]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2001;218:21-25.
10. Lagreze WD, Kardon RH. Correlation of relative afferent pupillary defect and estimated retinal ganglion cell loss. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998;236:401-404.
11. Johnson LN, Hill RA, Bartholomew MJ. Correlation of afferent pupillary defect with visual field loss on automated perimetry (see comment). Ophthalmology. 1988;95:1649-1655.
12. Kardon RH, Haupert CL, Thompson HS. The relationship between static perimetry and the relative afferent pupillary defect. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:351-356.
13. Thompson HS, Montague P, Cox TA, Corbett JJ. The relationship between visual acuity, pupillary defect, and visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;93:681-688.
14. Pandit RJ, Gales K, Griffiths PG. Effectiveness of testing visual fields by confrontation. Lancet. 2001;358:1339-1340.
15. MacMillan ES, Cummins D, Heron G, Dutton GN. The simultaneous interocular brightness sense test: a test of optic nerve function. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:1190-1197.
16. Lam BL, Thompson HS. An anisocoria produces a small relative afferent pupillary defect in the eye with the smaller pupil (see comment). J Neuro-Ophthalmol. 1999;19:153-159.