Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging: A review of sources of variability

Interface Focus

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 520-539

  Tang, M X ^a   Mulvana, H ^a   Gauthier, T ^b   Lim, A K P ^b   Cosgrove, D O ^a   Eckersley, R J ^a   Stride, E ^c  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b HAMMERSMITH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Medical ultrasound; Microbubble contrast agent; Perfusion quantification; Quantitative imaging; Variation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860109665     PISSN: 20428898     EISSN: 20428901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2011.0026     Document Type: Review

References (134)

1. Becher, H. & Burns, P. N. 2000 Handbook of contrast echocardiography, 1st edn. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
2. Cosgrove, D. & Lassau, N. 2010 Imaging of perfusion using ultrasound. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 37, S65-S85. (doi:10.1007/s00259-010-1537-7)
3. Wilson, S. R. & Burns, P. N. 2010 Microbubble-enhanced US in body imaging: what role? Radiology 257, 24-39. (doi:10.1148/radiol.10091210)
4. Sboros, V. & Tang, M. X. 2010 The assessment of microvascular flow and tissue perfusion using ultrasound imaging. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H J. Eng. Med. 224, 273-290. (doi:10.1243/09544119JEIM621)
5. Gramiak, R. & Shah, P. M. 1968 Echocardiography of the aortic root. Invest. Radiol. 3, 356-366. (doi:10. 1097/00004424-196809000-00011)
6. Kremkau, F. W., Gramiak, R., Carstens, E. l., Shah, P. M. & Kramer, D. H. 1970 Ultrasonic detection of cavitation at catheter tips. Am. J. Roentgenol. Radium Ther. Nucl. Med. 110, 177-183.
7. Eckersley, R. J., Chin, C. T. & Burns, P. N. 2005 Optimising phase and amplitude modulation schemes for imaging microbubble contrast agents at low acoustic power. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 31, 213-219. (doi:10. 1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.10.004)
8. Wei, K., Jayaweera, A. R., Firoozan, S., Linka, A., Skyba, D. M. & Kaul, S. 1998 Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. Circulation 97, 473-483.
9. Lindner, J. R., Villanueva, F. S., Dent, J.M., Wei, K., Sklenar, J. & Kaul, S. 2000 Assessment of resting perfusion with myocardial contrast echocardiography: theoretical and practical considerations. Am. Heart J. 139, 231-240.
10. Strouthos, C., Lampaskis, M., Sboros, V., McNeilly, A. & Averkiou, M. 2010 Indicator dilution models for the quantification of microvascular blood flow with bolus administration of ultrasound contrast agents. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 57, 1296-1310. (doi:10.1109/TUFFC.2010.1550)
11. Hudson, J. M., Karshafian, R. & Burns, P. N. 2009 Quantification of flow using ultrasound and microbubbles: a disruption replenishment model based on physical principles. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 35, 2007-2020. (doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.06.1102)
12. Arditi, M., Frinking, P. J. A., Zhou, X. & Rognin, N. G. 2006 A new formalism for the quantification of tissue perfusion by the destruct ion-replenishment method in contrast ultrasound Imaging. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 53, 1118-1129. (doi:10.1109/TUFFC.2006.1642510)
13. Sugimoto, K., Moriyasu, F., Kamiyama, N., Metoki, R. & Iijima, H. 2007 Parametric imaging of contrast ultrasound for the evaluation of neovascularization in liver tumors. Hepatol. Res. 37, 464-472. (doi:10.1111/j. 1872-034X.2007.00060.x)
14. Rognin, N. G., Arditi, M., Mercier, L., Frinking, P. J. A., Schneider, M., Perrenoud, G., Anaye, A., Meuwly, J.-Y. & Tranquart, F. 2010 Parametric imaging for characterizing focal liver lesions in contrast-enhanced ultrasound. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 57, 2503-2511. (doi:10.1109/TUFFC.2010.1716)
15. Porter, T. R. & Xie, F. 2010 Myocardial perfusion imaging with contrast ultrasound. Jacc Cardiovasc. Imaging 3, 176-187. (doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.09.024)
16. Lavisse, S. et al. 2008 Early quantitative evaluation of a tumor vasculature disruptive agent AVE8062 using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Invest. Radiol. 43, 100-111. (doi:10.1097/RLI. 0b013e3181577cfc)
17. Lassau, N., Koscielny, S., Chami, L., Chebil, M., Benatsou, B., Roche, A., Ducreux, M., Malka, D. & Boige, V. 2011 Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: early evaluation of response to bevacizumab therapy at dynamic contrastenhanced US with quantification-preliminary results. Radiology 258, 291-300. (doi:10.1148/radiol.10091870)
18. Staub, D., Partovi, S., Schinkel, A. F. L., Coll, B., Uthoff, H., Aschwanden, M., Jaeger, K. A. & Feinstein, S. B. 2011 Correlation of carotid artery atherosclerotic lesion echogenicity and severity at standard US with intraplaque neovascularization detected at contrast-enhanced US. Radiology 258, 618-626. (doi:10.1148/radiol.10101008)
19. Kamiyama, N., Moriyasu, F., Mine, Y. & Goto, Y. 1999 Analysis of flash echo from contrast agent for designing optimal ultrasound diagnostic systems. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 25, 411-420. (doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(98)00182-3)
20. Blomley, M. J. K., Albrecht, T., Cosgrove, D. O., Eckersley, R. J., Butler-Barnes, J., Jayaram, V. et al. 1999 Stimulated acoustic emission to image a late liver and spleen-specific phase of Levovistw in normal volunteers and patients with and without liver disease. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 25, 1341-1352. (doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(99)00081-2)
21. Verbeek, X., Willigers, J. M., Prinzen, F.W., Peschar, M., Ledoux, L. A. F. & Hoeks, A. P. G. 2001 High-resolution functional imaging with ultrasound contrast agents based on RF processing in an in vivo kidney experiment. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 27, 223-233. (doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(00)00318-5)
22. Peronneau, P., Lassau, N., Leguerney, I., Roche, A. & Cosgrove, D. 2010 Contrast ultrasonography: necessity of linear data processing for the quantification of tumor vascularization. Ultraschall in Der Medizin 31, 370-378. (doi:10.1055/s-0029-1245450)
23. Koster, J. et al. 2001 Blood flowassessment by ultrasoundinduced destruction of echocontrast agents using harmonic power Doppler imaging: which parameters determine contrast replenishment curves? Echocardiogr. J. Cardiovasc. Ultrasound Allied Tech. 18, 1-8. (doi:10.1046/j.1540-8175.2001.00001.x)
24. Schlosser, T. et al. 2001 Feasibilityof the flash-replenishment concept in renal tissue: Which parameters affect the assessment of the contrast replenishment? Ultrasound Med. Biol. 27, 937-944. (doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(01)00397-0)
25. Tang, M. X. & Eckersley, R. J. 2007 Frequency and pressure dependent attenuation and scattering by microbubbles. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 33, 164-168. (doi:10. 1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.07.031)
26. Emmer, M., Vos, H. J., Goertz, D. E., van Wamel, A., Versluis, M. & de Jong, N. 2009 Pressure-dependent attenuation and scattering of phospholipid-coated microbubbles at low acoustic pressures. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 35, 102-111. (doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.07.005)
27. Sboros, V., MacDonald, C. A., Pye, S. D., Moran, C. M., Gomatam, J. & McDicken, W. N. 2002 The dependence of ultrasound contrast agents backscatter on acoustic pressure: theory versus experiment. Ultrasonics 40, 579-583. (doi:10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00175-0)
28. Morgan, K. E., Dayton, P.A., Kruse, D. E., Klibanov, A. L., Brandenburger, G. H. &Ferrara, K.W. 1998 Changes in the echoes from ultrasonic contrast agents with imaging parameters. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 45, 1537-1548. (doi:10.1109/58.738293)
29. Shi, W. T., Forsberg, F., Raichlen, J. S., Needleman, L. & Goldberg, B. B. 1999 Pressure dependence of subharmonic signals from contrast microbubbles. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 25, 275-283. (doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(98) 00163-X)
30. Shi, W. T. & Forsberg, F. 2000 Ultrasonic characterization of the nonlinear properties of contrast microbubbles. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 26, 93-104. (doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(99)00117-9)
31. Emmer, M., VanWamel, A., Goertz, D. E. & De Jong, N. 2007 The onset of microbubble vibration. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 33, 941-949. (doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio. 2006.11.004)
32. Tang, M. X. & Eckersley, R. J. 2006 Nonlinear propagation of ultrasound through microbubble contrast agents and implications for imaging. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 53, 2406-2415. (doi:10. 1109/TUFFC.2006.189)
33. Gauthier, T. P., Averkiou, M. A. & Leen, E. L. S. 2011 Perfusion quantification using dynamic contrastenhanced ultrasound: The impact of dynamic range and gain on time-intensity curves. Ultrasonics 51, 102-106. (doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2010.06.004)
34. Averkiou, M., Lampaskis, M., Kyriakopoulou, K., Skarlos, D., Klouvas, G., Strouthos, C. & Leen, E. 2010 Quantification of tumor microvascularity with respiratory gated contrast enhanced ultrasound for monitoring therapy. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 36, 68-77. (doi:10. 1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.07.005)
35. Cosgrove, D., Eckersley, R., Blomley, M. & Harvey, C. 2001 Quantification of blood flow. Eur Radiol. 11, 1338-1344. (doi:10.1007/s003300100985)
36. Gauthier, T. P., Averkiou, M. A. & Leen, E. L. 2011 Perfusion quantification using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound: the impact of dynamic range and gain on time-intensity curves. Ultrasonics 51, 102-106. (doi:10. 1016/j.ultras.2010.06.004)
37. Rognin, N. G., Frinking, P., Costa, M. & Arditi, M. (eds) 2008 In vivo perfusion quantification by contrast ultrasound: validation of the use of linearized video data vs. raw RF data. In Ultrasonics Symp., IUS 2008 IEEE, pp. 1690-1693. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
38. Hoff, L. (ed.) 2001 Acoustic characterisation of contrast agents for medical ultrasound imaging. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
39. Tde Jong, N. & Hoff, L. 1993 Ultrasound scattering properties of Albunex microspheres. Ultrasonics 31, 175-181. (doi:10.1016/0041-624X(93)90004-J)
40. Marsh, J. N., Hughes, M. S., Hall, C. S., Lewis, S. H., Trousil, R. L., Brandenburger, G. H., Levene, H. & Miller, J. G. 1998 Frequency and concentration dependence of the backscatter coefficient of the ultrasound contrast agent Albunex (R). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 1654-1666. (doi:10.1121/1.424378)
41. Bouakaz, A., De Jong, N. & Cachard, C. 1998 Standard properties of ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 24, 469-472. (doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(97)00290-1)
42. Frinking, P. J. & de Jong, N. 1998 Acoustic modeling of shell-encapsulated gas bubbles. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 24, 523-533. (doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(98)00009-X)
43. Sboros, V., Pye, S. D., Anderson, T. A., Moran, C. M. & McDicken, W. N. 2007 Acoustic Rayleigh scattering at individual micron-sized bubbles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, (doi:10.1063/1.2714996)
44. Cameron JRJGSRMG 1999 Physics of the body, 2nd edn. Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing.
45. Fairbank, W. M. & Scully, M. O. 1977 New noninvasive technique for cardiac pressure measurement-resonant scattering of ultrasound from bubbles. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 24, 107-110. (doi:10.1109/TBME.1977.326112)
46. Moravi, V., Shroff, S. G., Robinson, K. A., Ng, A. F., Cholley, B. P., Marcus, R. H. & Lang, R. M. 1994 Effects of left-ventricular pressure on sonicated albumin microbubbles-evaluation using an isolated rabbit heart model. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 24, 1779-1785. (doi:10. 1016/0735-1097(94)90187-2)
47. Leodore, L. A., Forsberg, F. & Shi, W. T. 2007 In vitro pressure estimation obtained from subharmonic contrast microbubble signals. 2007 IEEE Ultrason. Symp. Proc. 1-6, 2207-2210. (doi:10.1109/ULTSYM.2007.555)
48. Andersen, K. S. & Jensen, J. A. 2010 Non-invasive estimation of blood pressure using ultrasound contrast agents. In Int. Congress on Ultrasonics, Proc. (ed. L. G. Garreton), pp. 245-253. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
49. de Jong, N., Ten Cate, F. J., Vletter, W. B. & Roelandt, J. R. T. C. 1993 Quantification of transpulmonary echocontrast effects. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 19, 279-288. (doi:10.1016/0301-5629(93)90100-3)
50. Shapiro, J. R., Reisner, S. A., Lichtenberg, G. S. & Meltzer, R. S. 1990 Intravenous contrast echocardiography with use of sonicated albumin in humans-systolic disappearance of left-ventricular contrast after transpulmonary transmission. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 16, 1603-1607. (doi:10.1016/0735-1097(90)90308-C)
51. Vuille, C., Nidorf, M., Morrissey, R. L., Newell, J. B., Weyman, A. E. &Picard, M.H. 1994 Effect of static pressure on the disappearance rate of specific echocardiographic contrast agents. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 7, 347-354.
52. Gottlieb, S., Ernst, A. & Meltzer, R. S. 1995 Effect of pressure on echocardiographic videodensity from sonicated albumin-an in vitro model. J. Ultrasound Med. 14, 109-116.
53. Brayman, A. A., Azadniv, M., Miller, M. W. & Meltzer, R. S. 1996 Effect of static pressure on acoustic transmittance of Albunex(R) microbubble suspensions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 2403-2408. (doi:10.1121/1.415428)
54. Gandhok, N. K., Block, R., Ostoic, T., Rawal, M., Hickle, P., Devries, S. & Feinstein, S. 1997 Reduced forward output states affect the left ventricular opacification of intravenously administered Albunex. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 10, 25-30. (doi:10.1016/S0894-7317(97)80029-6)
55. Lindner, J. R., Song, J., Jayaweera, A. R., Sklenar, J. & Kaul, S. 2002 Microvascular rheology of definity microbubbles after intra-arterial and intravenous administration. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 15, 396-403. (doi:10.1067/mje. 2002.117290)
56. Bouakaz, A. & de Jong, N. 2007 WFUMB safety symposium on echo-contrast agents: nature and types of ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 33, 187-196. (doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.07.008)
57. Vanliew, H. D. & Burkard, M. E. 1995 Bubbles in circulating blood-stabilization and simulations of cyclic changes of size and content. J. Appl. Physiol. 79, 1379-1385.
58. Maresca, D., Emmer, M., van Neer, P. L. M. J., Vos, H. J., Versluis, M., Muller, M., de Jong, N. & van der Steen, A. F. W. 2010 Acoustic sizing of an ultrasound contrast agent. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 36, 1713-1721. (doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.06.014)
59. Blomley, M. J. K. et al. 1999 Stimulated acoustic emission to image a late liver and spleen-specific phase of Levovistw in normal volunteers and patients with and without liver disease. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 25, 1341-1352. (doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(99)00081-2)
60. Lim, A. K. P., Patel, N., Eckersley, R. J., Goldin, R. D., Thomas, H. C., Cosgrove, D. O., Taylor-Robinson, S. D. & Blomley, M. J. K. 2006 Hepatic vein transit time of SonoVue: a comparative study with Levovist. Radiology 240, 130-135. (doi:10.1148/radiol.2401041517)
61. Owen, D. R., Shalhoub, J., Miller, S., Gauthier, T., Doryforou, O., Davies, A. H. & Leen, E. L. S. 2010 Inflammation within carotid atherosclerotic plaque: assessment with late-phase contrast-enhanced US. Radiology 255, 638-644. (doi:10.1148/radiol.10091365)
62. Kono, Y., Steinbach, G. C., Peterson, T., Schmid-Schonbein, G. W. & Mattrey, R. F. 2002 Mechanism of parenchymal enhancement of the liver with a microbubble-based US contrast medium: an intravital microscopy study in rats. Radiology 224, 253-257. (doi:10.1148/radiol.2241011352)
63. Lindner, J. R., Dayton, P. A., Coggins, M. P., Ley, K., Song, J., Ferrara, K. & Kaul, S. 2000 Noninvasive imaging of inflammation by ultrasound detection of phagocytosed microbubbles. Circulation 102, 531-538.
64. Yanagisawa, K., Moriyasu, F., Miyahara, T., Yuki, M. & Iijima, H. 2007 Phagocytosis of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles by Kupffer cells. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 33, 318-325. (doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.08.008)
65. Shunichi, S., Hiroko, I., Fuminori, M. & Waki, H. 2009 Definition of contrast enhancement phases of the liver using a perfluoro-based microbubble agent, perflubutane microbubbles. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 35, 1819-1827. (doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.05.013)
66. Lee, K. H., Choi, B. I., Kim, K. W., Kim, J. S., Won, H. J., Han, J.K., Kim, S.H. &Park, S.H. 2003 Contrast-enhanced dynamic ultrasonography of the liver: optimization of hepatic arterial phase in normal volunteers(2). Abdom. Imaging 28, 652-656. (doi:10.1007/s00261-002-0092-5)
67. Gasparini, C., Bertolotto, M., Crocè, S. L., Perrone, R., Quaia, E. & Tiribelli, C. 2003 Evaluation of liver parenchymal blood flow with contrast-enhanced US: preliminary results in healthy and cirrhotic patients1. Acad. Radiol. 10, 869-876. (doi:10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00003-5)
68. Maruyama, H., Matsutani, S., Saisho, H., Mine, Y., Yuki, H. & Miyata, K. 2004 Different behaviors of microbubbles in the liver: time-related quantitative analysis of two ultrasound contrast agents, Levovistw and Definityw. UltrasoundMed. Biol. 30, 1035-1040. (doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio. 2004.06.008)
69. Quaia, E., Blomley, M. J. K., Patel, S., Harvey, C. J., Padhani, A., Price, P. & Cosgrove, D. O. 2002 Initial observations on the effect of irradiation on the liver-specific uptake of Levovist. Eur. J. Radiol. 41, 192-199. (doi:10. 1016/S0720-048X(01)00458-2)
70. Liu, G. J., Moriyasu, F., Hirokawa, T., Rexiati, M., Yamada, M. & Imai, Y. 2008 Optical microscopic findings of the behavior of perflubutane microbubbles outside and inside Kupffer cells during diagnostic ultrasound examination. Invest. Radiol. 43, 829-836. (doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181852719)
71. Skrok, J. 2007. Markedly increased signal enhancement after the second injection of SonoVuew compared to the first-a quantitative normal volunteer study. In 12th European Symp. on Ultrasound Contrast Imaging, January 25-26th, 2007, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (Conference presentation).
72. Uchimoto, R., Niwa, K., Eguchi, H., Kamiyama, N., Mine, Y., Miyazawa, T. & Brautigam, M. 1999 In vivo kinetics of microbubbles of SHU 508 A (Levovist(R): comparison with Indocyanine Green in rabbits. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 25, 1365-1370. (doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(99)00090-3)
73. Mullin, L., Gessner, R., Kwan, J., Borden, M. A. & Dayton, P. A. (eds) 2009. An in vivo evaluation of the effects of anesthesia carrier gases on ultrasound contrast agent circulation. In Ultrasonics Symp. (IUS), 2009 IEEE Int., 20-23 September 2009. New York, NY: IEEE.
74. Izumi, H. &Ito, Y. 1999 Correlation between degree of inhibition of parasympathetic reflex vasodilation and MAC value for various inhalation anesthetics. Gen. Pharmacol. 32, 689-693. (doi:10.1016/S0306-3623(98)00242-0)
75. Molina, R., Sánchez, M., Hidalgo, A. & JoséGarcía De Boto, M. 1995 Effects of preanesthetic and anesthetic drugs on endothelium-dependent responses in the rat aorta. Gen. Pharmacol. Vasc. Syst. 26, 169-175. (doi:10.1016/0306-3623(94)00145-D)
76. Nyman, H. T., Kristensen, A. T., Kjelgaard-Hansen, M. & McEvoy, F. J. 2005 Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in normal canine liver. Evaluation of imaging and safety parameters. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 46, 243-250. (doi:10.1111/j.1740-8261.2005.00034.x)
77. Feingold, S., Gessner, R., Guracar, I. M. & Dayton, P. A. 2010 Quantitative volumetric perfusion mapping of the microvasculature using contrast ultrasound. Invest. Radiol. 45, 669-674. (doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181ef0a78)
78. Leinonen, M. R., Raekallio, M. R., Vainio, O. M., Ruohoniemi, M. O. & O'Brien, R. T. 2011 The effect of the sample size and location on contrast ultrasound measurement of perfusion parameters. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 52, 82-87.
79. Duck, F. A. 1990 Physical properties of tissue: a comprehensive reference book. London, UK: Academic Press.
80. Maklad, N. F., Ophir, J. & Balsara, V. 1984 Attenuation of ultrasound in normal liver and diffuse liver disease in vivo. Ultrasonic Imaging 6, 117-125. (doi:10.1016/0161-7346(84)90019-1)
81. Bos, L. J., Piek, J. J. & Spaan, J. A. E. 1996 Effects of shadowing on the time-intensity curves in contrast echocardiography: a phantom study. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 22, 217-227. (doi:10.1016/0301-5629(95)02032-2)
82. Tang, M. X., Mari, J. M., Wells, P. N. T. & Eckersley, R. J. 2008 Attenuation correction in ultrasound contrast agent imaging: elementary theory and preliminary experimental evaluation. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 34, 1998-2008. (doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.04.008)
83. Lindner, J. R. & Sklenar, J. 2004 Placing faith in numbers: quantification of perfusion with myocardial contrast echocardiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 43, 1814-1816. (doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.002)
84. Yano, A., Ito, H., Iwakura, K., Kimura, R., Tanaka, K., Okamura, A., Kawano, S., Masuyama, T. & Fujii, K. 2004 Myocardial contrast echocardiography with a new calibration method can estimate myocardial viability in patients with myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 43, 1799-1806. (doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.069)
85. Tang, M. X., Eckersley, R. J. & Noble, J. A. 2005 Pressure-dependent attenuation with microbubbles at low mechanical index. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 31, 377-384. (doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.12.009)
86. Pellot-Barakat, C., Mule, S., De Cesare, A., Lamuraglia, M., Lucidarme, O., Bridal, L., Herment, A. & Frouin, F. 2009 FAMIS based evaluation of a regularized attenuation correction method in contrast ultrasound imaging. Irbm 30, 174-178. (doi:10.1016/j.irbm.2009.05.002)
87. Mule, S., De Cesare, A., Lucidarme, O., Frouin, F. & Herment, A. 2008 Regularized estimation of contrast agent attenuation to improve the imaging of microbubbles in small animal studies. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 34, 938-948. (doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.11.014)
88. Mari, J. M., Hibbs, K. & Tang, M. X. 2007 A non-linear ultrasonic scattering approach for micro bubble concentration quantification. 2007 Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 1-16, 2183-2186. (doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4352756)
89. Mari, J. M., Hibbs, K., Stride, E., Eckersley, R. J. & Tang, M. X. 2010 An approximate nonlinear model for time gain compensation of amplitude modulated images of ultrasound contrast agent perfusion. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 57, 818-829. (doi:10.1109/TUFFC.2010.1487)
90. Tang, M.-X., Kamiyama, N. & Eckersley, R. J. 2010 Effects of nonlinear propagation in ultrasound contrast agent imaging. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 36, 459-466. (doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.11.011)
91. Stride, E., Tang, M. X. & Eckersley, R. J. 2009 Physical phenomena affecting quantitative imaging of ultrasound contrast agents. Appl. Acoust. 70, 1352-1362. (doi:10. 1016/j.apacoust.2008.10.003)
92. Yu, H. J., Jang, H. J., Kim, T. K., Khalili, K., Williams, R., Lueck, G., Hudson, J. & Burns, P. N. 2010 pseudoenhancement within the local ablation zone of hepatic tumors due to a nonlinear artifact on contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Am. J. Roentgenol. 194, 653-659. (doi:10. 2214/AJR.09.3109)
93. Pasovic, M., Danilouchkine, M., Matte, G., van der Steen, A. F. W., Basset, O., de Jong, N. & Cachard, C. 2010 Broadband reduction of the second harmonic distortion during nonlinear ultrasound wave propagation. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 36, 1568-1580. (doi:10.1016/j. ultrasmedbio.2010.06.006)
94. Couture, O., Aubry, J. F., Montaldo, G., Tanter, M. & Fink, M. 2008 Suppression of tissue harmonics for pulse-inversion contrast imaging using time reversal. Phys. Med. Biol. 53, 5469-5480. (doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/19/013)
95. Liao, A. H., Shen, C. C. & Li, P. C. 2010 Potential contrast improvement in ultrasound pulse inversion imaging using EMD and EEMD. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 57, 317-326. (doi:10.1109/TUFFC. 2010.1412)
96. Hibbs, K., Mari, J. M., Stride, E., Eckersley, R. J., Noble, A. & Tang, M. X. 2007 Nonlinear propagation of ultrasound through microbubble clouds: a novel numerical implementation. 2007 IEEE Ultrason. Symp. Proc. 1-6, 1997-2000. (doi:10.1109/ULTSYM.2007.502)
97. Tang, M.-X., Loughran, J., Stride, E., Zhang, D. & Eckersley, R. J. 2011 Effect of bubble shell nonlinearity on ultrasound nonlinear propagation through microbubble populations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, EL76-EL82. (doi:10.1121/1.3544677)
98. O'Brien, J.-P., Stride, E., Ovenden, N., Tang, M.-X. & Eckersley, R. J. 2011 Nonlinear propagation models for ultrasound pulse propagation through a polydisperse bubble population. In The 16th European Symp. on Ultrasound Contrast Imaging, Rotterdam. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus Medical Centre.
99. Lim, A., Patel, N., Eckersley, R., Taylor-Robinson, S., Martin, B. & David, C. 2003 Differences in the liver kinetics of SonoVue and Levovist. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 29, S11-S12. (doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(03)00110-8)
100. Sboros, V., Moran, C. M., Pye, S. D. & McDicken, W. N. 2001 Contrast agent stability: a continuous B-mode imaging approach. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 27, 1367-1377. (doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(01)00440-9)
101. Grulke, D. C., Marsh, N. A. & Hills, B. A. 1973 Experimental air-embolism-measurement of microbubbles using coulter counter. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 54, 684-691.
102. Sennoga, C. A., Mahue, V., Loughran, J., Casey, J., Seddon, J. M., Tang, M. & Eckersley, R. J. 2010 On sizing and counting of microbubbles using optical microscopy. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 36, 2093-2096. (doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.09.004)
103. Bloch, S. H., Short, R. E., Ferrara, K.W. &Wisner, E. R. 2005 The effect of size on the acoustic response of polymer-shelled contrast agents. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 31, 439-444. (doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.12.016)
104. de Jong, N., Hoff, L., Skotland, T. &Bom, N. 1992 Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres-theoretical considerations and some measurements. Ultrasonics 30, 95-103. (doi:10.1016/0041-624X(92) 90041-J)
105. Hasik, M. J., Kim, D. H., Howle, L. E., Needham, D. & Prush, D. P. 2002 Evaluation of synthetic phospholipid ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasonics 40, 973-982. (doi:10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00384-0)
106. Kudo, N. & Yamamoto, K. 2004 Physical properties of ultrasound contrast agents. Int. Cong. Ser. 1274, 49-52. (doi:10.1016/j.ics.2004.07.024)
107. Stride, E. 2008 The influence of surface adsorption on microbubble dynamics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 366, 2103-2115. (doi:10.1098/rsta.2008.0001)
108. Fisher, N. G., Christiansen, J. P., Klibanov, A., Taylor, R. P., Kaul, S. & Lindner, J. R. 2002 Influence of microbubble surface charge on capillary transit and myocardial contrast enhancement. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 40, 811-819. (doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02038-7)
109. Wrenn, S. P., Mleczko, M. & Schmitz, G. 2009 Phospholipid-stabilized microbubbles: influence of shell chemistry on cavitation threshold and binding to giant uni-lamellar vesicles. Appl. Acoust. 70, 1313-1322. (doi:10.1016/j. apacoust.2008.09.017)
110. Borden, M. A., Dayton, P., Shukui, Z. & Ferrara, K. W. (eds) 2004 Physico-chemical properties of the microbubble lipid shell [ultrasound contrast agents]. In Ultrasonics Symp., 2004 IEEE. New York, NY: IEEE.
111. Borden, M. A., Kruse, D. E., Caskey, C. F., Zhao, S. K., Dayton, P. A. & Ferrara, K. W. (eds) 2004. Influence of lipid shell physicochemical properties on ultrasoundinduced microbubble destruction. In Meeting of the IEEE-Ultrasonics-Ferroelectrics-and-Frequency-Control-Society, 2005. Montreal, Canada: IEEE Institute of Electrical Electronics Engineers Inc.
112. Borden, M. A. & Longo, M. L. 2002 Dissolution behavior of lipid monolayer-coated, air-filled microbubbles. Effect of lipid hydrophobic chain length. Langmuir 18, 9225-9233.
113. Chen, W.-S., Matula, T. J. & Crum, L. A. 2002 The disappearance of ultrasound contrast bubbles: observations of bubble dissolution and cavitation nucleation. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 28, 793-803. (doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(02)00517-3)
114. Raisinghani, A. & DeMaria, A. N. 2002 Physical principles of microbubble ultrasound contrast agents. Am. J. Cardiol. 90, 3-7. (doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02858-8)
115. Uchimoto, R., Niwa, K., Tsuda, N., Miyazawa, T. & Braütigam, M. 2000 Comparison of the efficacy of two air-based contrast agents in dogs. Eur. J. Ultrasound 11, 127-133. (doi:10.1016/S0929-8266(00)00079-3)
116. Bokor, D. 2000 Diagnostic efficacy of SonoVue. Am. J. Cardiol. 86, 19-24. (doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(00)00985-1)
117. Mulvana, H., Stride, E., Hajnal, J. V. & Eckersley, R. J. 2010 Temperature dependent behavior of ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 36, 925-934. (doi:10. 1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.03.003)
118. Chlon, C., Guedon, C., Verhaagen, B., Shi, W. T., Hall, C. S., Lub, J. & Böhmer, M. R. 2009 Effect of molecular weight, crystallinity, and hydrophobicity on the acoustic activation of polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents. Biomacromolecules 10, 1025-1031. (doi:10.1021/bm801243u)
119. Andersen, K. S. & Jensen, J. A. 2009 Ambient pressure sensitivity of microbubbles investigated through a parameter study. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 3350-3358. (doi:10.1121/1.3242359)
120. Talu, E., Powell, R. L., Longo, M. L. & Dayton, P. A. 2008 Needle size and injection rate impact microbubble contrast agent population. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 34, 1182-1185. (doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio. 2007.12.018)
121. Barrack, T. & Stride, E. 2009 Microbubble destruction during intravenous administration: a preliminary study. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 35, 515-522. (doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio. 2008.07.008)
122. Browning, R. M., H; Wells, D. J. &; Eckersley, R. J. Effect of needle gauge on microbubble mediated cell transfection in vivo. In British Medical Ultrasound General Scientific Meeting (Conference presentation), 28-30 September 2010. London, UK: British medical Ultrasound Society.
123. Palmowski, M., Lederle, W., Gaetjens, J., Socher, M., Hauff, P., Bzyl, J., Semmler, W., Günther, R. W. & Kiessling, F. 2010 Comparison of conventional timeintensity curves vs. maximum intensity over time for post-processing of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Eur. J. Radiol. 75, e149-e153. (doi:10.1016/j. ejrad.2009.10.030)
124. Duncan, P. B. & Needham, D. 2004 Test of the Epstein-Plesset model for gas microparticle dissolution in aqueous media: effect of surface tension and gas undersaturation in solution. Langmuir 20, 2567-2578. (doi:10.1021/la034930i)
125. Katiyar, A., Sarkar, K. & Jain, P. 2009 Effects of encapsulation elasticity on the stability of an encapsulated microbubble. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 336, 519-525. (doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2009.05.019)
126. Kwan, J. J. & Borden, M. A. 2010 Microbubble dissolution in a multigas environment. Langmuir 26, 6542-6548. (doi:10.1021/la904088p)
127. Stride, E. & Saffari, N. 2005 Investigating the significance of multiple scattering in ultrasound contrast agent particle populations. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control IEEE Trans. 52, 2332-2345. (doi:10.1109/TUFFC.2005.1563278)
128. Lampaskis, M. & Averkiou, M. 2010 investigation of the relationship of nonlinear backscattered ultrasound intensity with microbubble concentration at low MI. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 36, 306-312. (doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio. 2009.09.011)
129. Porter, T., Kricsfeld, D., Cheatham, S. & Li, S. 1998 Effect of blood and microbubble oxygen and nitrogen content on perfluorocarbon-filled dextrose albumin microbubble size and efficacy: in vitro and in vivo studies. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 11, 421-425. (doi:10.1016/S0894-7317(98)70020-3)
130. Rubaltelli, L., Corradin, S., Dorigo, A., Tregnaghi, A., Adami, F., Rossi, C. R. & Stramare, R. 2007 Automated quantitative evaluation of lymph node perfusion on contrast-enhanced sonography. Am. J. Roentgenol. 188, 977-983. (doi:10.2214/AJR.06.0562)
131. Eckersley, R. J., Sedelaar, J. P. M., Blomley, M. J. K., Wijkstra, H., deSouza, N. M., Cosgrove, D. O. & de la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H. 2002 Quantitative microbubble enhanced transrectal ultrasound as a tool for monitoring hormonal treatment of prostate carcinoma. Prostate 51, 256-267. (doi:10.1002/pros.10065)
132. Hettiarachchi, K., Talu, E., Longo, M. L., Dayton, P. A. & Lee, A. P. 2007 On-chip generation of microbubbles as a practical technology for manufacturing contrast agents for ultrasonic imaging. Lab Chip 7, 463-468. (doi:10. 1039/b701481n)
133. Stride, E. & Edirisinghe, M. 2008 Novel microbubble preparation technologies. Soft Matter 4, 2350-2359. (doi:10.1039/b809517p)
134. Lin, P. L., Eckersley, R. J. & Hall, E. A. H. 2009 Ultrabubble: a laminated ultrasound contrast agent with narrow size range. Adv. Mater. 21, 3949-3952.