Magnetic resonance imaging of the postoperative hip

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1013-1025

  Hayter, Catherine L ^a   Koff, Matthew F ^a   Potter, Hollis G ^a,b  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Artifacts; Hip arthroplasty; Magnetic resonance imaging; Metal hypersensitivity; Osteolysis

Indexed keywords

METAL;

ACCURACY; FRACTURE; HEMARTHROSIS; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; IMPLANT; IONIZING RADIATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSTEOLYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REVIEW; SYNOVITIS; TENDINITIS; TENDON;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTIFACTS; HEMARTHROSIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; METALS; NERVE COMPRESSION SYNDROMES; OSSIFICATION, HETEROTOPIC; OSTEOLYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; SYNOVITIS; TENDINOPATHY;

EID: 84859799530     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23523     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:1487-1497. (Pubitemid 40917748)
2. Harris WH. The problem is osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995:46-53.
3. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:780-785. (Pubitemid 46564282)
4. Potter HG, Foo LF. Magnetic resonance imaging of joint arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2006;37:361-373, vi-vii. (Pubitemid 44041513)
5. Walde TA, Weiland DE, Leung SB, et al. Comparison of CT, MRI, and radiographs in assessing pelvic osteolysis: a cadaveric study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005:138-144. (Pubitemid 41099080)
6. Weiland DE, Walde TA, Leung SB, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of periprosthetic acetabular osteolysis: a cadaveric study. J Orthop Res 2005;23:713-719. (Pubitemid 40960019)
7. Wendt RE 3rd, Wilcott MR 3rd, Nitz W, Murphy PH, Bryan RN. MR imaging of susceptibility-induced magnetic field inhomogeneities. Radiology 1988;168:837-841.
8. Harris CA, White LM. Metal artifact reduction in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging. Orthop Clin North Am 2006;37:349-359, vi. (Pubitemid 44041515)
9. Lee MJ, Kim S, Lee SA, et al. Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multidetector CT. Radiographics 2007;27:791-803.
10. White LM, Kim JK, Mehta M, et al. Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging-initial experience. Radiology 2000;215:254-262. (Pubitemid 30190539)
11. Ebraheim NA, Savolaine ER, Zeiss J, Jackson WT. Titanium hip implants for improved magnetic resonance and computed tomography examinations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992:194-198.
12. Henk CB, Brodner W, Grampp S, et al. The postoperative spine. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:247-264. (Pubitemid 30013590)
13. Mueller PR, Stark DD, Simeone JF, et al. MR-guided aspiration biopsy: needle design and clinical trials. Radiology 1986;161:605-609. (Pubitemid 17200401)
14. Frazzini VI, Kagetsu NJ, Johnson CE, Destian S. Internally stabilized spine: optimal choice of frequency-encoding gradient direction during MR imaging minimizes susceptibility artifact from titanium vertebral body screws. Radiology 1997;204:268-272.
15. Sperling JW, Potter HG, Craig EV, Flatow E, Warren RF. Magnetic resonance imaging of painful shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002;11:315-321. (Pubitemid 36904223)
16. Sofka CM, Potter HG. MR imaging of joint arthroplasty. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2002;6:79-85. (Pubitemid 34258312)
17. Suh JS, Jeong EK, Shin KH, et al. Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:1207-1213.
18. Naraghi AM, White LM. Magnetic resonance imaging of joint replacements. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2006;10:98-106.
19. Koch KM, Hargreaves BA, Pauly KB, Chen W, Gold GE, King KF. Magnetic resonance imaging near metal implants. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;32:773-787.
20. Ramos-Cabrer P, van Duynhoven JP, Van der Toorn A, Nicolay K. MRI of hip prostheses using single-point methods: in vitro studies towards the artifact-free imaging of individuals with metal implants. Magn Reson Imaging 2004;22:1097-1103. (Pubitemid 39451890)
21. Venook RD, Matter NI, Ramachandran M, et al. Prepolarized magnetic resonance imaging around metal orthopedic implants. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:177-186.
22. Butts K, Pauly JM, Gold GE. Reduction of blurring in view angle tilting MRI. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:418-424. (Pubitemid 40171056)
23. Olsen RV, Munk PL, Lee MJ, et al. Metal artifact reduction sequence: early clinical applications. Radiographics 2000;20:699-712.
24. Lu W, Pauly KB, Gold GE, Pauly JM, Hargreaves BA. SEMAC: slice encoding for metal artifact correction in MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009;62:66-76.
25. Koch KM, Lorbiecki JE, Hinks RS, King KF. A multispectral three-dimensional acquisition technique for imaging near metal implants. Magn Reson Med 2009;61:381-390.
26. Koff M, Koch K, Potter HG. Magnetic resonance imaging of periprosthetic tissues in the presence of joint arthroplasty. In: Proc 18th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Stockholm; 2010.
27. Koff MK, Hayter CL, P. Shah, Koch KM, Miller TT, Potter HG. Magnetic resonance imaging of arthroplasty: comparison of MAVRIC and conventional fast spin echo techniques. In: Proc 19th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Montreal, 2011.
28. Koch KM, Brau AC, Chen W, et al. Imaging near metal with a MAVRIC-SEMAC hybrid. Magn Reson Med 2010;65:71-82.
29. Purdue PE, Koulouvaris P, Potter HG, Nestor BJ, Sculco TP. The cellular and molecular biology of periprosthetic osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;454:251-261. (Pubitemid 46074927)
30. Lavernia CJ. Cost-effectiveness of early surgical intervention in silent osteolysis. J Arthroplasty 1998;13:277-279. (Pubitemid 28193997)
31. Carlsson AS, Gentz CF. Radiographic versus clinical loosening of the acetabular component in noninfected total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984:145-150. (Pubitemid 14136813)
32. Hodgkinson JP, Shelley P, Wroblewski BM. The correlation between the roentgenographic appearance and operative findings at the bone-cement junction of the socket in Charnley low friction arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988:105-109. (Pubitemid 18095464)
33. Engh CA Jr, Sychterz CJ, Young AM, Pollock DC, Toomey SD, Engh CA Sr. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in radiographic assessment of osteolysis. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:752-759. (Pubitemid 35001179)
34. Puri L, Wixson RL, Stern SH, Kohli J, Hendrix RW, Stulberg SD. Use of helical computed tomography for the assessment of acetabular osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A:609-614.
35. Potter HG, Nestor BJ, Sofka CM, Ho ST, Peters LE, Salvati EA. Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissue. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A:1947-1954. (Pubitemid 39223463)
36. Marshall A, Ries MD, Paprosky W. How prevalent are implant wear and osteolysis, and how has the scope of osteolysis changed since 2000? J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008;16(Suppl 1):S1-6.
37. Malchau H, Potter HG. How are wear-related problems diagnosed and what forms of surveillance are necessary? J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008;16(Suppl 1):S14-19.
38. Hayter CL, Potter HG, Padgett DE, Perino G, Nestor BJ. MRI assessment of wear-induced synovitis. In: Proc 19th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Montreal, 2011.
39. Antti-Poika I, Josefsson G, Konttinen Y, Lidgren L, Santavirta S, Sanzen L. Hip arthroplasty infection. Current concepts. Acta Orthop Scand 1990;61:163-169. (Pubitemid 20205748)
40. Potter HG, Foo LF, Nestor BJ. What is the role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasty? HSS J 2005;1:89-93.
41. Hash TW, Maderazo AB, Haas SB, Saaboeiro GR, Trost DW, Potter HG. Magnetic resonance angiography in the management of recurrent hemarthrosis following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011 [Epub ahead of print].
42. Cook SM, Pellicci PM, Potter HG. Use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of an occult fracture of the femoral component after total hip arthroplasty. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A:149-153. (Pubitemid 38057351)
43. Manaster BJ. Total hip arthroplasty: radiographic evaluation. Radiographics 1996;16:645-660.
44. Pellicci PM, Potter HG, Foo LF, Boettner F. MRI shows biologic restoration of posterior soft tissue repairs after THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:940-945.
45. Lewellen DG. Heterotopic ossification following total hip arthroplasty. Instr Cours Lect 1995;4:287-292.
46. Ledermann HP, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB. Pelvic heterotopic ossification: MR imaging characteristics. Radiology 2002;222:189-195. (Pubitemid 34031487)
47. Beck M, Sledge JB, Gautier E, Dora CF, Ganz R. The anatomy and function of the gluteus minimus muscle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000;82:358-363. (Pubitemid 30248915)
48. Bunker TD, Esler CN, Leach WJ. Rotator-cuff tear of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997;79:618-620.
49. Pfirrmann CW, Notzli HP, Dora C, Hodler J, Zanetti M. Abductor tendons and muscles assessed at MR imaging after total hip arthroplasty in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Radiology 2005;235:969-976. (Pubitemid 40695896)
50. Lachiewicz PF, Kauk JR. Anterior iliopsoas impingement and tendinitis after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009;17:337-344.
51. Campbell P, Ebramzadeh E, Nelson S, Takamura K, De Smet K, Amstutz HC. Histological features of pseudotumor-like tissues from metal-on-metal hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:2321-2327.
52. Campbell P, Shimmin A, Walter L, Solomon M. Metal sensitivity as a cause of groin pain in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 2008;23:1080-1085.
53. Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90:847-851. (Pubitemid 352009768)
54. Kwon YM, Ostlere SJ, McLardy-Smith P, Athanasou NA, Gill HS, Murray DW. "Asymptomatic" pseudotumors after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty prevalence and metal ion study. J Arthroplasty 2010;26:511-518.
55. Hart AJ, Sabah S, Henckel J, et al. The painful metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:738-744.
56. Garden RS. Malreduction and avascular necrosis in subcapital fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1971;53:183-197.
57. Bachiller FG, Caballer AP, Portal LF. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002:87-109.
58. Kawasaki M, Hasegawa Y, Sakano S, et al. Prediction of osteonecrosis by magnetic resonance imaging after femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001:157-164. (Pubitemid 32247002)
59. Kaushik A, Sankaran B, Varghese M. Prognostic value of dynamic MRI in assessing post-traumatic femoral head vascularity. Skeletal Radiol 2009;38:565-569.
60. Boraiah S, Dyke JP, Hettrich C, et al. Assessment of vascularity of the femoral head using gadolinium (Gd-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:131-137.
61. Dyke JP, Hettrich C, Hentel K, Boraiah S, Lorich D. Perfusion of the femoral head following fracture using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. In: Proc 19th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Montreal, 2011.