Magnetic resonance imaging of joint replacements

Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 98-106

  Naraghi, Ali M ^a   White, Lawrence M ^b  

^a ROYAL LONDON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Artifacts; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BONE GRAFT; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FRACTURE NONUNION; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MAGNETIC FIELD; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RADIOFREQUENCY; SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SYNOVITIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; HIP; KNEE; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REVIEW; SHOULDER;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SHOULDER JOINT;

EID: 33745901932     PISSN: 10897860     EISSN: 1098898X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-934220     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Arthroplasty and Total Joint Replacement Procedures 1991-2000. Available at http://www.aaos.org/wordhtml/ research/arthropl.htm. Accessed October 12, 2004
2. Teeny SM, York SC, Mesko JW, Rea RE. Long-term followup care recommendations after total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003;18:954-962
3. Eustace S, Shah B, Mason M. Imaging orthopedic hardware with an emphasis on hip prostheses. Orthop Clin North Am 1998;29:67-84
4. Chandler HP, Reineck FT, Wixson RL. Imaging orthopedic hardware with an emphasis on hip prostheses. Total hip replacement in patients younger than thirty years old. A five-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981;63:1426-1434
5. Weissman BN. Current topics in the radiology of joint replacement surgery. Radiol Clin North Am 1990;28:1111-1134
6. Callaghan JJ, O'Rourke MR, Saleh KJ. Why knees fail: lessons learned. J Arthroplasty 2004;19(4 Suppl 1):31-34
7. Bozic KJ, Rubash HE. The painful total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;420:18-25
8. Dennis DA. Evaluation of painful total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004;19(4 Suppl 1):35-40
9. Guermazi A, Miaux Y, Zaim S, Peterfy CG, White D, Genant HK. Metallic artefacts in MR imaging: effects of main field orientation and strength. Clin Radiol 2003;58:322-328
10. Suh JS, Jeong EK, Shin KH, et al. Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants atMR imaging: experimental and clinical studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:1207-1213
11. Eustace S, Jara H, Goldberg R, et al. A comparison of conventional spin-echo and turbo spin-echo imaging of soft tissues adjacent to orthopedic hardware. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:455-458
12. Ganapathi M, Joseph G, Savage R, Jones AR, Timms B, Lyons K. MRI susceptibility artefacts related to scaphoid screws: the effect of screw type, screw orientation and imaging parameters. J Hand Surg [Br] 2002;27:165-170
13. Laakman RW, Kaufman B, Han JS, et al. MR imaging in patients with metallic implants. Radiology 1985;157:711-714
14. Petersilge CA, Lewin JS, Duerk JL, Yoo JU, Ghaneyem AJ. Optimizing imaging parameters for MR evaluation of the spine with titanium pedicle screws. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:1213-1218
15. White LM, Kim JK, Mehta M, et al. Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging - initial experience. Radiology 2000;215:254-262
16. White LM, Buckwalter KA. Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2002;6:5-17
17. Czervionke LF, Daniels DL, Wehrli FW, et al. Magnetic susceptibility artifacts in gradient-recalled echo MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1988;9:1149-1155
18. Tien RD, Buxton RB, Schwaighofer BW, Chu PK. Quantitation of structural distortion of the cervical neural foramina in gradient-echo MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991;1:683-687
19. Tormanen J, Tervonen O, Koivula A, Junila J, Suramo I. Image technique optimization in MR imaging of a titanium alloy joint prosthesis. JMagn Reson Imaging 1996;6:805-811
20. Ludeke KM, Roschmann P, Tischler R. Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1985;3:329-343
21. Arbogast-Ravier S, Gangi A, Choquet P, Brunot B, Constantinesco A. An in vitro study at low field for MR guidance of a biopsy needle. Magn Reson Imaging 1995;13:321-324
22. Jensen JH, Chandra R. Strong field behavior of the NMR signal from magnetically heterogeneous tissues. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:226-236
23. Sofka CM, Potter HG. MR imaging of joint arthroplasty. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2002;6:79-85
24. Olsen RV, Munk PL, Lee MJ, et al. Metal artifact reduction sequence: early clinical applications. Radiographics 2000;20:699-712
25. Frazzini VI, Kagetsu NJ, Johnson CE, Destian S. Internally stabilized spine: optimal choice of frequency-encoding gradient direction during MR imaging minimizes susceptibility artifact from titanium vertebral body screws. Radiology 1997;204:268-272
26. Viano AM, Gronemeyer SA, Haliloglu M, Hoffer FA. Improved MR imaging for patients with metallic implants. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:287-295
27. Tartaglino LM, Flanders AE, Vinitski S, Friedman DP. Metallic artifacts on MR images of the postoperative spine: reduction with fast spin-echo techniques. Radiology 1994;190:565-569
28. Bakker CJ, Bhagwandien R, Moerland MA, Fuderer M. Susceptibility artifacts in 2DFT spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging: the cylinder model revisited. Magn Reson Imaging 1993;11:539-548
29. Czerny C, Krestan C, Imhof H, Trattnig S. Magnetic resonance imaging of the postoperative hip. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:214-220
30. Dixon WT. Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 1984;153:189-194
31. Moriguchi H, Lewin JS, Duerk JL. Dixon techniques in spiral trajectories with off-resonance correction: a new approach for fat signal suppression without spatial-spectral RF pulses. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:915-924
32. Rybicki FJ, Chung T, Reid J, Jaramillo D, Mulkern RV, Ma J. Fast three-point Dixon MR imaging using lowresolution images for phase correction: a comparison with chemical shift selective fat suppression for pediatric musculoskeletal imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:1019-1023
33. Wohlgemuth WA, Roemer FW, Bohndorf K. Short tau inversion recovery and three-point Dixon water-fat separation sequences in acute traumatic bone fractures at open 0.35 tesla MRI. Skeletal Radiol 2002;31:343-348
34. Ma J, Singh SK, Kumar AJ, Leeds NE, Zhan J. T2-weighted spine imaging with a fast three-point Dixon technique: comparison with chemical shift selective fat suppression. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:1025-1029
35. Huegli RW, Tirman PF, Bonel HM, et al. Use of the modified three-point Dixon technique in obtaining T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-saturated images on an open magnet. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1781-1786
36. Ramos Cabrer P, van Duynhoven JPM, Van der Toorn A, Nicolay K. MRI of hip prostheses using single-point methods: in vitro studies towards the artifact-free imaging of individuals with metal implants. Magn Reson Imaging 2004;22:1097-1103
37. Tigges S, Stiles RG, Roberson JR. Complications of hip arthroplasty causing periprosthetic radiolucency on plain radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:1387-1391
38. Twair A, Ryan M, O'Connell M, Powell T, O'Byrne J, Eustace S. MRI of failed total hip replacement caused by abductor muscle avulsion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1547-1550
39. Pfirrmann C, Zanetti M, Dora C, Hodler J. MR imaging of abductor tendons and muscles after total hip arthroplasty in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Presented at Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (SSK24-06); December 1, 2004; Chicago, IL
40. Potter HG, Nestor BJ, Sofka CM, Ho ST, Peters LE, Salvati EA. Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissue. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:1947-1954
41. Cook SM, Pellicci PM, Potter HG. Use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of an occult fracture of the femoral component after total hip arthroplasty. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:149-153
42. Sugimoto H, Hirose I, Miyaoka E, et al. Low-field-strength MR imaging of failed hip arthroplasty: association of femoral periprosthetic signal intensity with radiographic, surgical, and pathologic findings. Radiology 2003;229:718-723
43. Vince KG. Why knees fail. J Arthroplasty 2003;18(3, Suppl 1): 39-44
44. Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;392:315-318
45. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;404:7-13
46. Sofka CM, Potter HG, Figgie M, Laskin R. Magnetic resonance imaging of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;406:129-135
47. Sperling JW, Potter HG, Craig EV, Flatow E, Warren RF. Magnetic resonance imaging of painful shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002;11:315-321
48. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Zilber S, Van Driessche S. Shoulder surgery: from cuff repair to joint replacement. An update. Joint Bone Spine 2003;70:422-432