SEMAC: Slice encoding for metal artifact correction in MRI

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 66-76

  Lu, Wenmiao ^a,c   Pauly, Kim Butts ^a   Gold, Garry E ^a   Pauly, John M ^b   Hargreaves, Brian A ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Distorted excitation profiles; Distortion correction; Field inhomogeneities; Metal artifacts; Metal induced distortions; Metallic implants; Susceptibility artifact; View angle tilting

Indexed keywords

ENCODING (SYMBOLS); IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SIGNAL ENCODING;

DISTORTION CORRECTION; EXCITATION PROFILE; INHOMOGENEITIES; METAL ARTIFACTS; METALLIC IMPLANTS; SUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTS; VIEW ANGLES;

METALS;

COBALT; METAL;

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; FRACTURE FIXATION; IN VIVO STUDY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

EID: 67650085839     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21967     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the united states from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:1487-1497.
2. Resnick D. Diagnosis of bone and joint disorders. New York: Saunders; 2002.
3. Olsen RV, Munk PL, Lee MJ, Janzen DL, MacKay AL, Xiang QS, Masri B. Metal artifact reduction sequence: Early clinical applications. Radiographics 2000;20:699-712.
4. Eustace S, Goldberg R, Williamson D, Melhem ER, Oladipo O, Yucel EK, Jara H. MR imaging of soft tissues adjacent to orthopaedic hardware: Techniques to minimize susceptibility artefact. Clin Radiol 1997;52:589-594.
5. Ludeke KM, Roschmann P, Tischler R. Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1985;3:329-343.
6. Graf H, Steidle G, Martirosian P, Lauer UA, Schick F. Metal artifacts caused by gradient switching. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:231-234.
7. Camacho CR, Plewes DB, Henkelman RM. Nonsusceptibility artifacts due to metallic objects inMRimaging. JMagn Reson Imaging 1995;5:75-88.
8. Skare S, Anderson J. Correction of MR image distortions induced by metallic objects using a 3D cubic B-Spline basis set: Application to stereotactic surgical planning. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:169-181.
9. Butts K, Gold GE. Correction of slice profile distortions from metallic devices. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Seattle, 2006. p 2380.
10. Venook RD, Matter NI, Ramachandran M, Ungersma SE, Gold GE, Giori NJ, Macovski A, Scott GC, Conolly SM. Prepolarized magnetic resonance imaging around metal orthopedic implants. Magnetic Resonance Med 2006;56:177-186.
11. Cho ZH, Kim DJ, Kim YK. Total inhomogeneity correction including chemical shifts and susceptibility by view angle tilting. Med Phys 1988;15:7-11.
12. Butts K, Pauly JM, Gold GE. Reduction of blurring in view angle tilting MRI. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:418-24.
13. Kolind SH, MacKay AL, Munk PL, Xiang QS. Quantitative evaluation of metal artifact reduction techniques. JMagn Reson Imaging 2004;20:487-495.
14. Koch KM, Busse RF, Lewein T, Potter HG, Hinks R, King K. Multiple resonant frequency offset acquisitions for imaging of metallic implants. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Toronto, 2008. p 1250.
15. LuW, Butts K, Gold GE, Pauly JM, Hargreaves BA. Towards artifact-free MRI near metallic implants. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Toronto, 2008. p 838.
16. Koch KM, Hinks R, King K. Empirical and computed B0 perturbations induced by metallic implants. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Toronto, 2008. p 1180.
17. Nishimura DG. Principles of magnetic resonance imaging. Stanford: Stanford University; 1996.
18. Speier P, Trautwein F. A calibration for radial imaging with large inplane shifts. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Miami, 2005. p 2295.
19. Guermazi A, Miaux Y, Zaim S, Peterfy C, White D, Genant HK. Metallic artefacts in MR imaging: Effects of main field orientation and strength. Clin Radiol 2003;58:322-328.
20. Graf H, Steidle G, Martirosian P, Lauer UA, Schick F. MRI of hip prostheses using single-point methods: In vitro studies towards the artifact-free imaging of individuals with metal implants. Magn Reson Imaging 2004;22:1097-1103.
21. Glover GH. 3D z-shim method for reduction of susceptibility effects in BOLD fMRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:290-299.
22. Constable RT, Spencer DD. Composite image formation in z-shimmed functional MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:110-117.
23. 2*-weighted images at high fields by gradient-echo slice excitation profile imaging. Mag Reson Med 1998;39:402-409.
24. Busse RF, Hariharan H, Vu A, Brittain JH. Fast spin echo sequences with very long echo trains: Design of variable refocusing flip angle schedules and generation of clinical t2 contrast. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:1030-1037.
25. Noll DC, Nishimura DG, Macovski A. Homodyne detection in magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1991;10:154-163.
26. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952-962.
27. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, Nittka M, Jellus V, Wang J, Kiefer B, Haase A. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1202-1210.
28. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM. Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:1182-1195.