Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: Experimental and clinical studies

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 171, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 1207-1213

  Suh, Jin Suck ^a   Jeong, Eun Kee ^a   Shin, Kyoo Ho ^a   Cho, Jae Hyun ^a,b   Na, Jae Boem ^a,c   Kim, Dae Hong ^d   Han, Chang Dong ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Ajou University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Gyeongsang National University   (South Korea)

^d Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; METAL IMPLANTATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0031771124     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.171.5.9798849     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Shellock FG, Morisoli S, Kanal E. MR procedures and biomedical implants, materials, and devices: 1993 updates. Radiology 1993;189:587-599
2. Shellock FG. MR imaging of metallic implants and materials: a complication of the literature. AJR 1988;151:811-814
3. Shellock FG, Crues JV. High-field strength MR imaging and metallic biomedical implants: an ex vivo evaluation of deflection forces. AJR 1988; 151:389-392
4. Simmons A, Tofts PS, Barker GJ, Arridge SR. Sources of intensity nonuniformity in spin echo images at 1.5 T. Magn Reson Med 1994;32:121-128
5. Beuf O, Briguet A, Lissac M, Davis R. Magnetic resonance imaging for the determination of magnetic susceptibility of materials. J Magn Reson B 1996;112:111-118
6. Bakker CJG, Bhagwandien R, Moerland MA, Ramos LM. Simulation of susceptibility artifacts in 2D and 3D Fourier transform spin-echo and gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1994;12:767-774
7. Bakker CJG, Moerland MA, Bhagandien R, Beersma R. Analysis of machine-dependent and object-induced geometric distortion in 2DFT MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1992;10:597-608
8. Schenck JF. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 1996;23:815-850
9. Ludeke KM, Roschmann P, Tischler R. Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1985;3:329-343
10. Petersilge CA, Lewin JS, Duerk JL, Yoo JU, Ghanayem AJ. Optimization of parameters for MR evaluation of the spine with titanium pedicle screws. AJR 1996;166:1213-1218
11. Posse S, Aue WP. Susceptibility artifacts in spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging. J Magn Reson 1990;88:473-492
12. Bhagandien R, van Ee R, Beersma R, Bakker CJG, Moerland MA, Lagendijk JJW. Numerical analysis of the magnetic field for arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions in 2D. Magn Reson Imaging 1992;10:299-313
13. Bakker CJG, Bhagandien R, Moerland MA, Fuderer M. Susceptibility artifacts in 2DFT spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging: the cylinder model revisited. Magn Reson Imaging 1993;11:539-548
14. Yamada N, Imakita S, SakumaT, et al. Evaluation of the susceptibility effect on the phase images of a simple gradient echo. Radiology 1990;175:561-565
15. Cho ZH, Ro YM. Reduction of susceptibility artifact in gradient echo imaging. Magn Reson Med 1992;23:193-200
16. Kim JK, Kucharczyk W, Henkelman RM. Cavernous hemangiomas: dipolar susceptibility artifacts at MR imaging. Radiology 1993;187:735-741
17. Tartaglino LM, Flanders AE, Vinitski S, Friedman DP. Metallic artifacts on MR images of the postoperative spine: reduction with fast spin-echo techniques. Radiology 1994;190:565-569
18. Vinitski S, Mitchell DG, Einstein SG, et al. Conventional and fast spin-echo MR imaging: minimizing echo time. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3:501-507
19. Augustiny N, von Schulthess GK, Meier D, Boesiger P. MR imaging of large nonferromagnetic metallic implants. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11:678-683
20. Shellock FG, Mink JH, Curtin S, Friedman MJ. MR imaging and metallic implants for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: assessment of ferromagnetism and artifacts. J Magn Reson Imaging 1992;2:225-228
21. Ebraheim NA, Savolaine ER, Zeiss J, Jackson WT. Titanium hip implants for improved magnetic resonance and computed tomography examinations. Clin Orthop 1992;275:194-198
22. Ebraheim NA, Savolaine ER, Stintgen SH, Jackson WT. Magnetic resonance imaging after pedicular screw fixation of the spine. Clin Orthop 1992;279: 133-137
23. Rupp R, Ebraheim NA, Savolaine ER, Jackson WT. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the spine with metal implants. Spine 1993;18: 379-385
24. Lyons CJ, Betz RR, Mesgarzadeh M, Revesz G, Bonakdarpour A, Clancy M. The effect of magnetic resonance imaging on metal spine implants. Spine 1989;14:670-672