Using E-Z Reader to simulate eye movements in nonreading tasks: A unified framework for understanding the eye-mind link

Psychological Review

Volumn 119, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 155-185

  Reichle, Erik D ^a   Pollatsek, Alexander ^b   Rayner, Keith ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; E Z Reader; Reading; Saccades; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; OCULOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME; READING; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; STATISTICS; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

ATTENTION; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EYE MOVEMENT MEASUREMENTS; EYE MOVEMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; REACTION TIME; READING; SACCADES; VISION, OCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84859763041     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0026473     Document Type: Article

References (129)

1. Assadollahi, R., & Pulvermüller, F. (2001). Neuromagnetic evidence for early access to cognitive representations. NeuroReport, 12, 207-213.
2. Assadollahi, R., & Pulvermüller, F. (2003). Early evidence of word length and frequency: A group study using MEG. NeuroReport, 14, 1183-1187.
3. Becker, W., & Jürgens, R. (1979). An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli. Vision Research, 19, 967-983. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(79)90222-0
4. Bergen, J. R., & Julesz, B. (1983, June 23). Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination. Nature, 303, 696-698. doi:10.1038/303696a0
5. Biederman, I. (1972, July 7). Perceiving real-world scences. Science, 177, 77-80. doi:10.1126/science.177.4043.77
6. Boyce, S. J., & Pollatsek, A. (1992). Identification of objects in scenes: The role of scene background in object naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 531-543. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.18.3.531
7. Carpenter, R. H. S. (2000). The neural coding of looking. Current Biology, 10, R291-R293. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00430-9
8. Clark, V. P., Fan, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses. Human Brain Mapping, 2, 170-187. doi:10.1002/hbm.460020306
9. Dehaene, S. (2009). Reading in the brain: The science and evolution of a human invention. New York, NY: Viking.
10. Engbert, R., & Krügel, A. (2010). Readers use Bayesian estimation for eyemovement control. Psychological Science, 21, 366-371. doi: 10.1177/0956797610362060
11. Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777-813. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777
12. Eriksen, C. W., & Shultz, D. W. (1977). Retinal locus and acuity in visual information processing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 81-84.
13. Feng, G. (2006). Eye movements as time-series random variables: A stochastic model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 70-95. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.07.004
14. Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11-15. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00158
15. Ferreira, F., & Patson, N. D. (2007). The "good enough" approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 71-83. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00007.x
16. Findlay, J. M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2003). Active vision: The psychology of looking and seeing. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
17. Foxe, J. J., & Simpson, G. V. (2002). Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans: A framework for defining "early" visual processing. Experimental Brain Research, 142, 139-150. doi:10.1007/s00221-001-0906-7
18. Francis, W. N., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
19. Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178-210. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1
20. Henderson, J. M., Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Mack, M. (2007). Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during visual search in real-world scenes. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 537-562). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
21. Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417-429. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.3.417
22. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 243-271. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.243
23. Hirotani, M., Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (2006). Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence wrapup: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 425-443. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.001
24. Hooge, I. T. C., & Erkelens, C. J. (1998). Adjustment of fixation duration during visual search. Vision Research, 38, 1295-1302. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00287-3
25. Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (1998, August 6). Visual search has no memory. Nature, 394, 575-577. doi:10.1038/29068
26. Ibos, G., Duhamel, J.-R., & Hamed, S. B. (2009). The spatial and temporal deployment of voluntary attention across the visual field. PLoS ONE, 4, e6716. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006716
27. Inhoff, A. W., & Radach, R. (1998). Definition and computation of oculomotor measures in the study of cognitive processes. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 29-53). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
28. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489-1506. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00163-7
29. Jolicoeur, P., Ullman, S., & Mackay, M. (1986). Curve tracing: A possible basic operation in the perception of spatial relations. Memory & Cognition, 14, 129-140. doi:10.3758/BF03198373
30. Kirchner, H., & Thorpe, S. J. (2006). Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: Visual processing speed revisited. Vision Research, 46, 1762-1776. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.002
31. Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 12-35. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.12
32. Liu, Y.-P., & Reichle, E. D. (2010). The emergence of adaptive eye movements in reading. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrabone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1136-1141). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
33. Logie, R. H. (1995). Visual-spatial working memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997, November 20). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjuctions. Nature, 390, 279-281. doi:10.1038/36846
35. McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., & Zola, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations in words. Vision Research, 28, 1107-1118. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(88)90137-X
36. McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., Zola, D., & Jacobs, A. M. (1989). Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 245-253. doi:10.3758/BF03208086
37. McConkie, G. W., Zola, D., Grimes, J., Kerr, P. W., Bryant, N. R., & Wolff, P. M. (1991). Children's eye movements during reading. In J. F. Stein (Ed.), Vision and visual dyslexia (pp. 251-262). London, England: Macmillan.
38. McDonald, S. A., Carpenter, R. H. S., & Shillcock, R. C. (2005). An anatomically constrained, stochastic model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 112, 814-840. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.814
39. Morrison, R. E. (1984). Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 667-682. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.667
40. Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Giard, M.-H., Bentin, S., Aguera, P.-E., & Pernier, J. (2000). Neurophysiological correlates of face gender processing in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 303-310. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00888.x
41. Najemnik, J., & Geisler, W. S. (2005, March 17). Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search. Nature, 434, 387-391. doi:10.1038/nature03390
42. Najemnik, J., & Geisler, W. S. (2008). Eye movement statistics in humans are consistent with an optimal search strategy. Journal of Vision, 8, 1-14. doi:10.1167/8.3.4
43. Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2009). Mindless reading revisited: An analysis based on the SWIFT model of eyemovement control. Vision Research, 49, 322-336. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.10.022
44. Nuthmann, A., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2005). Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 45, 2201-2217. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.02.014
45. Nuthmann, A., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2007). The IOVP effect in mindless reading: Experiment and modeling. Vision Research, 47, 990-1002. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.005
46. Nuthmann, A., Smith, T. J., Engbert, R., & Henderson, J. M. (2010). CRISP: A computational model of fixation durations in scene viewing. Psychological Review, 117, 382-405. doi:10.1037/a0018924
47. O'Regan, J. K. (1990). Eye movements in reading. In E. Kowler (Ed.), Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (pp. 395-453). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
48. O'Regan, J. K. (1992). Eye movements and reading. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 333-354). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
49. O'Regan, J. K., & Lévy-Schoen, A. (1987). Eye-movement strategy and tactics in word recognition and reading. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance: Vol. 12. The psychology of reading (pp. 363-384). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Penolazzi, B., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2007). Early semantic context integration and lexical access as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Biological Psychology, 74, 374-388.
51. Phillips, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 283-290.
52. Pitt, M. A., Myung, I. J., & Zhang, S. (2002). Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition. Psychological Review, 109, 472-491. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.472
53. Pollatsek, A., Juhasz, B. J., Reichle, E. D., Machacek, D., & Rayner, K. (2008). Immediate and delayed effects of word frequency and word length on eye movements in reading: A delayed effect of word length.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 726-750. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.726
54. Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1999). Is covert attention really unnecessary? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 695-696. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99442153
55. Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2006a). Attention to one word at a time is still a viable hypothesis: Rejoinder to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1496-1500. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1496
56. Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2006b). Serial processing is consistent with the time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading: A response to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1485-1489. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1485
57. Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2006c). Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 1-56. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.06.001
58. Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Potter, M. C. (1975, March 14). Meaning in visual search. Science, 187, 965-966. doi:10.1126/science.1145183
60. Potter, M. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 509-522. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.2.5.509
61. Rayner, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations with words. Perception, 8, 21-30. doi:10.1068/p080021
62. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
63. Rayner, K. (2009). The Thirty-Fifth Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457-1506. doi:10.1080/17470210902816461
64. Rayner, K., Ashby, J., Pollatsek, A., & Reichle, E. D. (2004). The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z Reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 720-732. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.720
65. Rayner, K., Carlson, M., & Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantic during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 358-374. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90236-0
66. Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14, 191-201. doi:10.3758/BF03197692
67. Rayner, K., & Fischer, M. H. (1996). Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 734-747. doi:10.3758/BF03213106
68. Rayner, K., Juhasz, B., Ashby, J., & Clifton, C. (2003). Inhibition of saccade return in reading. Vision Research, 43, 1027-1034. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00076-2
69. Rayner, K., Kambe, G., & Duffy, S. A. (2000). The effects of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Ex-perimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 53(A), 1061-1080. doi:10.1080/02724980050156290
70. Rayner, K., Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2007). Extending the E-Z Reader model of eye movement control to Chinese readers. Cognitive Science, 31, 1021-1033. doi:10.1080/03640210701703824
71. Rayner, K., & Morrison, R. M. (1981). Eye movements and identifying words in parafoveal vision. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 17, 135-138.
72. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1981). Eye movement control during reading: Evidence for direct control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 33(A), 351-373.
73. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Erlbaum.
74. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton, C. (2012). The psychology of reading (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
75. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Drieghe, D., Slattery, T. J., & Reichle, E. D. (2007). Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: Comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 520-529. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.520
76. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Liversedge, S. P., & Reichle, E. D. (2009). Eye movements and non-canonical reading: Comments on Kennedy and Pynte (2008). Vision Research, 49, 2232-2236. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.10.013
77. Rayner, K., & Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading and visual search: Effects of word frequency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 245-248. doi:10.3758/BF03212426
78. Rayner, K., Reichle, E. D., Stroud, M. J., Williams, C. C., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). The effects of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and elderly readers. Psychology and Aging, 21, 448-465. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.448
79. Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Morris, R. K., Schmauder, A. R., & Clifton, C. (1989). Eye movements and online language comprehension processes. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, S121-S149. doi:10.1080/01690968908406362
80. Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., & Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1188-1200. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.22.5.1188
81. Rayner, K., Slowiaczek, M. L., Clifton, C., & Bertera, J. H. (1983). Latency of sequential eye movements: Implications for reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 912-922. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.9.6.912
82. Rayner, K., Warren, T., Juhasz, B. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2004). The effects of plausibility on eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1290-1301. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1290
83. Reichle, E. D. (2011). Serial attention models of reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Oxford handbook on eye movements (pp. 767-786). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
84. Reichle, E. D., & Laurent, P. A. (2006). Using reinforcement learning to understand the emergence of "intelligent" eye-movement behavior during reading. Psychological Review, 113, 390-408. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.390
85. Reichle, E. D., Liu, Y.-P., & Laurent, P. A. (2011). The emergence of adaptive eye movement control in reading: Theory and data. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 9, 45-52.
86. Reichle, E. D., Liversedge, S. P., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2009). Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 115-119. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.12.002
87. Reichle, E. D., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Morphology in word identification: A word experience model that accounts for morpheme frequency effects. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 219-237. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0703_2
88. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.125
89. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2007). Modeling the effects of lexical ambiguity on eye movements during reading. In R. P. G. Van Gompel, M. F. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 271-292) Oxford, England: Elsevier.
90. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1999). Eye movement control in reading: Accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model. Vision Research, 39, 4403-4411. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00152-2
91. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445-476. doi:10.1017/S0140525X03000104
92. Reichle, E. D., Reineberg, A. E., & Schooler, J. W. (2010). An eye-movement study of mindless reading. Psychological Science, 21, 1300-1310. doi:10.1177/0956797610378686
93. Reichle, E. D., Tokowicz, N., Liu, Y., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Testing an assumption of the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control during reading: Using event-related potentials to examine the familiarity check. Psychophysiology, 48, 993-1003. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01169.x
94. Reichle, E. D., Warren, T., & McConnell, K. (2009). Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher-level language processing on eye movements during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 1-21. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.1.1
95. Reilly, R., & Radach, R. (2006). Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 34-55. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.07.006
96. Reingold, E. M., & Rayner, K. (2006). Examining the word identification stages hypothesized by the E-Z Reader model. Psychological Science, 17, 742-746. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01775.x
97. Reingold, E. M., Reichle, E. D., Glaholt, M. G., & Sheridan, H. (in press). Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from survival analysis of fixation durations. Cognitive Psychology.
98. Robinson, A. (1995). The story of writing: Alphabets, hieroglyphs, and pictograms. London, England: Thames & Hudson.
99. Sagi, D., & Julesz, B. (1985a). Fast noninertial shifts of attention. Spatial Vision, 1, 141-149. doi:10.1163/156856885X00152
100. Sagi, D., & Julesz, B. (1985b). "Where" and "what" in vision. Science, 228, 1217-1219. doi:10.1126/science.4001937
101. Salvucci, D. D. (2001). An integrated model of eye movements and visual encoding. Cognitive Systems Research, 1, 201-220. doi:10.1016/S1389-0417(00)00015-2
102. Salvucci, D. D. (2006). Modeling driver behavior in a cognitive architecture. Human Factors, 48, 362-380. doi:10.1518/001872006777724417
103. Sanford, A. J. (2002). Context, attention and depth of processing during interpretation. Mind & Language, 17, 188-206. doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00195
104. Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (2005). Memory-based approaches and beyond. Discourse Processes, 39, 205-224.
105. Schilling, H. E. H., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1270-1281. doi: 10.3758/BF03201199
106. Schooler, J. W., Reichle, E. D., & Halpern, D. V. (2004). Zoning out while reading: Evidence for dissociations between experience and metaconscious-ness. In D. T. Levin (Ed.), Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in adults and children (pp. 203-226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
107. Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2011). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. Advance online publication. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2
108. Sereno, S. C., Rayner, K., & Posner, M. I. (1998). Establishing a time-line of word recognition: Evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. NeuroReport, 9, 2195-2200. doi:10.1097/00001756-199807130-00009
109. Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement learning: An introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
110. Swets, B., Desmet, T., Clifton, C., & Ferreira, F. (2008). Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities: Evidence from self-paced reading. Memory & Cognition, 36, 201-216. doi:10.3758/MC.36.1.201
111. Taylor, W. L. (1953). Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30, 415-433.
112. Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113, 766-786. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.766
113. Trukenbrod, H. A., & Engbert, R. (2007). Oculomotor control in a sequential search task. Vision Research, 47, 2426-2443.
114. Tsal, Y. (1983). Movements of attention across the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 523-530. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.9.4.523
115. VanRullen, R., & Thorpe, S. (2001). The time course of visual processing: From early perception to decisionmaking. Journal of Cognitive Neuro-science, 13, 454-461. doi:10.1162/08989290152001880
116. Vanyukov, P. M., Warren, T., Wheeler, M. E., & Reichle, E. D. (in press). The emergence of frequency effects in eye movements. Cognition.
117. Vitu, F., McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P., & O'Regan, J. K. (2001). Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: An inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 41, 3513-3533. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00166-3
118. Vitu, F., O'Regan, J. K., Inhoff, A. W., & Topolski, R. (1995). Mindless reading: Eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading text. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 352-364. doi:10.3758/BF03213060
119. Warren, T., & McConnell, K. (2007). Disentangling the effects of selectional restriction violations and plausibility violation severity on eye-movements in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 770-775. doi:10.3758/BF03196835
120. Warren, T., McConnell, K., & Rayner, K. (2008). Effects of context on eye movements when reading about plausible and impossible events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1001-1010. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.1001
121. Warren, T., White, S. J., & Reichle, E. D. (2009). Investigating the causes of wrap-up effects: Evidence from eye movements and E-Z Reader.Cognition, 111, 132-137.doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.011
122. Williams, C. C., & Pollatsek, A. (2007). Searching for an O in an array of Cs: Eye movements track moment-to-moment processing in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 372-381. doi:10.3758/BF03193758
123. Williams, C. C., Pollatsek, A., & Reichle, E. D. (2011). Examining eye movements in visual search through clusters of objects in a circulararray. Manuscript submitted for review.
124. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guide Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238. doi:10.3758/BF03200774
125. Wolfe, J. M., Alvarez, G. A., & Horowitz, T. S. (2000, August 17). Attention is fast but volition is slow. Nature, 406, 691. doi:10.1038/35021132
126. Yang, S.-N. (2006). An oculomotor-based model of eye movements in reading: The competition/activation model. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 56-69. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.07.005
127. Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
128. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517. doi:10.1006/jmla.2002.2864
129. Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. Psychological Review, 115, 787-835. doi:10.1037/a0013118