Testing an assumption of the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control during reading: Using event-related potentials to examine the familiarity check

Psychophysiology

Volumn 48, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 993-1003

  Reichle, Erik D ^a   Tokowicz, Natasha ^a   Liu, Ying ^b   Perfetti, Charles A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b LIAONING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957808240     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01169.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Atkinson, R. C., & Juola, J. F. (1973). Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 583-611). New York: Academic Press.
2. Baccino, T., & Manunta, Y. (2005). Eye-fixation related potentials: Insight into parafoveal processing. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19, 204-215.
3. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357.
4. Becker, W., & Jürgens, R. (1979). An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli. Vision Research, 19, 967-983.
5. Clark, V. P., Fan, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (1995). Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses. Human Brain Mapping, 2, 170-187.
6. Coles, M. G. H., & Rugg, M. D. (1995). Event-related brain potentials: An introduction. In M. Rugg & M. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind (pp. 1-25). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7. Csibra, G., Johnson, M. H., & Tucker, L. A. (1997). Attention and oculomotor control: A high-density ERP study of the gap effect. Neuropsychologia, 35, 855-865.
8. Csibra, G., Tucker, L. A., & Johnson, M. H. (1998). Neural correlates of saccade planning in infants: A high-density ERP study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 29, 201-215.
9. Dambacher, M., Kliegl, R., Hoffmann, M., & Jacobs, A. (2006). Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading. Brain Research, 1084, 89-103.
10. Ferree, T. C., Luu, P., Russell, G. S., & Tucker, D. M. (2001). Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 536-544.
11. Foxe, J. J., & Simpson, G. V. (2002). Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans: A framework for defining "early" visual processing. Experimental Brain Research, 142, 139-150.
12. Francis, W. N., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
13. Gehring, W., Goss, B., Coles, M., Meyer, D., & Donchin, E. (1993). A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 4, 385-390.
14. Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential. Clincial Neurophysiology, 115, 1090-1103.
15. Heinzle, J., Hepp, K., & Martin, K. A. C. (2010). A biologically realistic cortical model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 117, 808-830.
16. Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span during reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417-429.
17. Hoffman, J. E., Simons, R. F., & Houck, M. R. (1983). Event-related potentials during controlled and automatic target detection. Psychophysiology, 20, 625-632.
18. Jasper, H. H. (1958). The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 48, 113-126.
19. Jennings, J. R. (1987). Editorial policy on analyses of variance with repeated measures. Psychophysiology, 24, 474-475.
20. Joyce, C. A., Gorodnitsky, I. F., King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (2002). Tracking eye fixations with electroocular and electroencephalographic recordings. Psychophysiology, 39, 607-618.
21. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
22. Kazai, K., & Yagi, A. (1999). Integrated effect of stimulation at fixation points on EFRP (eye-fixation related brain potentials). International Journal of Psychophysiology, 32, 193-203.
23. Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 12-35.
24. Kroll, J. F., & Merves, J. S. (1986). Lexical access for concrete and abstract words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 92-107.
25. Leff, A. P., Scott, S. K., Rothwell, J. C., & Wise, R. J. S. (2001). The planning and guiding of reading saccades: A repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 918-923.
26. McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., & Zola, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of the initial eye fixations on words. Vision Research, 28, 1107-1118.
27. McPeek, R. M., Skavenski, A. A., & Nakayama, K. (2000). Concurrent processing of saccades in visual search. Vision Research, 40, 2499-2516.
28. Molker, A., & Fischer, B. (1999). The recognition and correction of involuntary prosaccades in an antisaccade task. Experimental Brain Research, 125, 511-516.
29. Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Gaird, H.-H., Bentin, S., Aguera, P.-E., & Pernier, J. (2000). Neurophysiological correlates of face gender processing in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 303-310.
30. Picton, T. W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S. A., Johnson, R. Jr., et al. (2000). Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology, 37, 127-152.
31. Polich, J., & Donchin, E. (1988). P300 and the word frequency effect. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 70, 33-45.
32. Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1999). Is covert attention really unnecessary? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 695-696.
33. Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2006). Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 1-56.
34. Rayner, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words. Perception, 8, 21-30.
35. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
36. Rayner, K., Ashby, J., Pollatsek, A., & Reichle, E. (2004). The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z Reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 720-732.
37. Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory and Cognition, 14, 191-201.
38. Rayner, K., Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2007). Extending the E-Z Reader model of eye movement control to Chinese readers. Cognitive Science, 31, 1021-1033.
39. Rayner, K., & Morrison, R. M. (1981). Eye movements and identifying words in parafoveal vision. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 17, 135-138.
40. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Liversedge, S. P., & Reichle, E. D. (2009). Eye movements and non-canonical reading: Comments on Kennedy and Pynte (2008). Vision Research, 49, 2232-2236.
42. Rayner, K., Slowiaczek, M. L., Clifton, C., & Bertera, J. H. (1983). Latency of sequential eye movements: Implications for reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 912-922.
43. Reichle, E. D. (2010). Serial attention models of reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Oxford handbook on eye movements. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press (in press).
44. Reichle, E. D., & Laurent, P. A. (2006). Using reinforcement learning to understand the emergence of "intelligent" eye-movement control during reading. Psychological Review, 113, 390-408.
45. Reichle, E. D., Liversedge, S. P., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2009). Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 115-119.
46. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Towards a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
47. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2006). E-Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 4-22.
48. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparison to other models. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 26, 445-476.
49. Reichle, E. D., Vanyukov, P. M., Laurent, P. A., & Warren, T. (2008). Serial or parallel? Using depth-of-processing to examine attention allocation during reading. Vision Research, 48, 1831-1836.
50. Reichle, E. D., Warren, T., & McConnell, K. (2009). Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 1-21.
51. Reingold, E. M. (2003). Eye-movement control in reading: Models and predictions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 500-501.
52. Reingold, E. M., & Rayner, K. (2006). Examining the word identification stages hypothesized by the E-Z Reader model. Psychological Science, 17, 742-746.
53. Salvucci, D. D. (2001). An integrated model of eye movements and visual encoding. Cognitive Systems Research, 1, 201-220.
54. Schilling, H. E. H., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory and Cognition, 26, 1270-1281.
55. Sereno, S. C., Brewer, C. C., & O'Donnell, P. J. (2003). Context effects in word recognition: Evidence for early interactive processing. Psychological Science, 14, 328-333.
56. Sereno, S. C., Rayner, K., & Posner, M. I. (1998). Establishing a time-line of word recognition: Evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. NeuroReport, 9, 2195-2200.
57. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
58. Van Rullen, R., & Thorpe, S. (2001). The time course of visual processing: From early perception to decision-making. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 454-461.
59. Vanyukov, P. M., Tokowicz, N., Reichle, E. D., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). What is the familiarity check? Using event-related potentials to examine how orthographic, phonological, and semantic information affects eye-movement latencies. Manuscript in preparation.
60. Vergilino, D., & Beauvillain, C. (2000). The planning of refixation saccades in reading. Vision Research, 40, 3527-3538.
61. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517.
62. Young, L., & Sheena, D. (1975). Survey of eye movement recording methods. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 7, 397-429.