Behavioral plasticity in an invaded system: Non-native whelks recognize risk from native crabs

Oecologia

Volumn 169, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 105-115

  Grason, Emily W ^a,b,c   Miner, Benjamin G ^a,b  

^a WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Inducible defenses; Invasive species; Non consumptive effects; Risk assessment; Trait mediated effects

Indexed keywords

PHEROMONE;

ABUNDANCE; ADAPTATION; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; CRAB; DEFENSE BEHAVIOR; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; GASTROPOD; INVASIVE SPECIES; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; NATIVE SPECIES; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BRACHYURA; DRUG EFFECT; GASTROPOD; INTRODUCED SPECIES; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATION; RISK;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BRACHYURA; CUES; GASTROPODA; INTRODUCED SPECIES; PHEROMONES; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; RISK;

DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); OCINEBRINA INORNATA; OSTREIDAE; STRAMONITA HAEMASTOMA; UROSALPINX CINEREA;

EID: 84859643669     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2188-5     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Abrams PA (2007) Defining and measuring the impact of dynamic traits on interspecific interactions. Ecology 88: 2555-2562.
2. Alexander JE, Covich AP (1991) Predation risk and avoidance-behavior in 2 fresh-water snails. Biol Bull 180: 387-393.
3. Appleton RD, Palmer AR (1988) Water-borne stimuli released by predatory crabs and damaged prey induce more predator-resistant shells in a marine gastropod. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 4387-4391.
4. Bolker B (2008) Ecological models and data in R. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
5. Bolker B, Holyoak M, Krivan V, Rowe L, Schmitz O (2003) Connecting theoretical and empirical studies of trait-mediated interactions. Ecology 84: 1101-1114.
6. Bourdeau PE (2009) Prioritized phenotypic responses to combined predators in a marine snail. Ecology 90: 1659-1669.
7. Bryan S, Robinson A, Sweetser M (2002) Behavioral responses of a small native fish to multiple introduced predators. Environ Biol Fish 63: 49-56.
8. Buhle ER, Ruesink JL (2009) Impacts of invasive oyster drills on Olympia oyster (Ostrea lurida Carpenter 1864) recovery in Willapa Bay, Washington, United States. J Shellfish Res 28: 87-96.
9. Chapman WM, Banner AH (1949) Contributions to the life history of the Japanese oyster drill, Tritonalia japonica (=Ceratostoma inornatum), with notes on other enemies of the Olympia oyster, Ostrea lurida. Washington Department of Fisheries Biological Report 49A. Washington Department of Fisheries, Olympia, pp 167-200.
10. Cheung SG, Tong PY, Shin PKS (2004) Chemical cues from predators and damaged conspecifics affect byssus production in the green-lipped mussel Perna viridis. Mar Freshw Behav Phys 37: 127-135.
11. Chew KK (1960) Study of food preference and rate of feeding of Japanese Oyster Drill, Ocinebra japonica (Dunker). United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington D. C.
12. Chivers DP, Smith RJF (1998) Chemical alarm signalling in aquatic predator-prey systems: A review and prospectus. Ecoscience 5: 338-352.
13. Cotton PA, Rundle SD, Smith KE (2004) Trait compensation in marine gastropods: shell shape, avoidance behavior, and susceptibility to predation. Ecology 85: 1581-1584.
14. Dalesman S, Rundle SD, Coleman RA, Cotton PA (2006) Cue association and antipredator behaviour in a pulmonate snail, Lymnaea stagnalis. Anim Behav 71: 789-797.
15. Downes S, Hoefer AM (2004) Antipredatory behaviour in lizards: interactions between group size and predation risk. Anim Behav 67: 485-492.
16. Dudas SE, McGaw IJ, Dower JF (2005) Selective crab predation on native and introduced bivalves in British Columbia. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 325: 8-17.
17. Engel K, Tollrian R (2009) Inducible defences as key adaptations for the successful invasion of Daphnia lumholtzi in North America? Proc R Soc B 276: 1865-1873.
18. Fievet V, Lhomme P, Outreman Y (2008) Predation risk cues associated with killed conspecifics affect the behavior and reproduction of prey animals. Oikos 117: 1380-1385.
19. Flueck WT (2004) Observations of interactions between Puma, Puma concolor, and introduced European Red Deer, Cervus elaphus, in Patagonia. Can Field Nat 118: 132-134.
20. Gherardi F, Acquistapace P, Hazlett BA, Whisson G (2002) Behavioural responses to alarm odours in indigenous and non-indigenous crayfish species: a case study from Western Australia. Mar Freshw Res 53: 93-98.
21. Grand TC, Dill LM (1999) The effect of group size on the foraging behaviour of juvenile coho salmon: reduction of predation risk or increased competition? Anim Behav 58: 443-451.
22. Hanks JE (1957) The rate of feeding of the common oyster drill, Urosalpinx cinerea (Say), at controlled water temperatures. Biol Bull 112: 330-335.
23. Harvell CD (1990) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Q Rev Biol 65: 323-340.
24. Holsman KK, McDonald PS, Armstrong DA (2006) Intertidal migration and habitat use by subadult Dungeness crab Cancer magister in a NE Pacific estuary. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 308: 183-195.
25. Hunt CE, Yamada SB (2003) Biotic resistance experienced by an invasive crustacean in a temperate estuary. Biol Inv 5: 33-43.
26. Jacobsen HP, Stabell OB (2004) Antipredator behaviour mediated by chemical cues: the role of conspecific alarm signalling and predator labelling in the avoidance response of a marine gastropod. Oikos 104: 43-50.
27. Jensen GC, McDonald PS, Armstrong DA (2007) Biotic resistance to green crab, Carcinus maenas, in California bays. Mar Biol 151: 2231-2243.
28. Kiesecker J, Blaustein A (1997) Population differences in responses to red-legged frogs (Rana aurora) to introduced bullfrogs. Ecology 78: 1752-1760.
29. Kimbro DL, Grosholz ED, Baukus AJ, Nesbitt NJ, Travis NM, Attoe S, Coleman-Hulbert C (2009) Invasive species cause large-scale loss of native California oyster habitat by disrupting trophic cascades. Oecologia 160: 563-575.
30. Laforsch C, Beccara L, Tollrian R (2006) Inducible defenses: the relevance of chemical alarm cues in Daphnia. Limnol Oceanog 51: 1466-1472.
31. Lages BG, Fleury BG, Ferreira CEL, Pereira RC (2006) Chemical defense of an exotic coral as invasion strategy. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 328: 127-135.
32. Lyons DA, Scheibling RE, VanAlstyne KL (2010) Spatial and temporal variation in DMSP content in the invasive seaweed Codium fragile ssp. fragile: effects of temperature, light and grazing. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 417: 51-61.
33. Manzi JJ (1970) Combined effects of salinity and temperature on the feeding, reproductive, and survival rates of Eupleura caudata (Say) and Urosalpinx cinerea (Say) (Prosobranchia: Muricidae). Biol Bull 138: 35-46.
34. Martel C, Guarini JM, Blanchard G, Sauriau PG, Trichet C, Robert S, Garcia-Meunier P (2004) Invasion by the marine gastropod Ocinebrellus inornatus in France. III. Comparison of biological traits with the resident species Ocenebra erinacea. Mar Biol 146: 93-102.
35. McCoy MW (2007) Conspecific density determines the magnitude and character of predator-induced phenotype. Oecologia 153: 871-878.
36. Moore RD, Griffiths RA, O'Brien CM, Murphy A, Jay D (2004) Induced defences in an endangered amphibian in response to an introduced snake predator. Oecologia 141: 139-147.
37. Palmer AR (1990) Effect of crab effluent and scent of damaged conspecifics on feeding, growth, and shell morphology of the Atlantic Dogwhelk Nucella lapillus (L.). Hydrobiologia 193: 155-182.
38. Pangle K, Peacor SD (2006) Non-lethal effect of the invasive predator Bythotrephes longimanus on Daphnia mendotae. Freshw Biol 51: 1070-1078.
39. Pangle KL, Peacor SD, Johannsson OE (2007) Large nonlethal effects of an invasive invertebrate predator on zooplankton population growth rate. Ecology 88: 402-412.
40. Payne CM, Tillberg CV, Suarez AV (2004) Recognition systems and biological invasions. Ann Zool Fenn 41: 843-858.
41. Peacor SD (2003) Phenotypic modifications to conspecific density arising from predation risk assessment. Oikos 100: 409-415.
42. Pearl CA, Adams MJ, Schuytema GS, Nebeker AV (2003) Behavioral responses of anuran larvae to chemical cues of native and introduced predators in the Pacific Northwestern United States. J Herp 37: 572-576.
43. Pulliam HR (1973) Advantages of flocking. J Theor Biol 38: 419-422.
44. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
45. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
46. Relyea RA (2002) Competitor-induced plasticity in tadpoles: consequences, cues, and connections to predator-induced plasticity. Ecol Monogr 72: 523-540.
47. Relyea RA (2004) Fine-tuned phenotypes: tadpole plasticity under 16 combinations of predators and competitors. Ecology 85: 172-179.
48. Roberts G (1996) Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases. Anim Behav 51: 1077-1086.
49. Salo P, Nordstrom M, Thomson RL, Korpimaki E (2008) Risk induced by a native top predator reduces alien mink movements. J Anim Ecol 77: 1092-1098.
50. Schoeppner NM, Relyea RA (2005) Damage, digestion, and defence: the roles of alarm cues and kairomones for inducing prey defences. Ecol Lett 8: 505-512.
51. Sih A (1985) Evolution, predator avoidance, and unsuccessful predation. Am Nat 125: 153-157.
52. Sih A, Englund G, Wooster D (1998) Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends Ecol Evol 13: 350-355.
53. Sih A, Bolnick DI, Luttbeg B, Orrock JL, Peacor SD, Pintor LM, Preisser E, Rehage JS, Vonesh JR (2010) Predator-prey naivete, antipredator behavior, and the ecology of predator invasions. Oikos 119: 610-621.
54. Slusarczyk M (1999) Predator-induced diapause in Daphnia magna may require two chemical cues. Oecologia 119: 159-165.
55. Smee DL, Weissburg MJ (2006) Hard clams Mercenaria mercenaria evaluate predation risk using chemical signals from predators and injured conspecifics. J Chem Ecol 32: 605-619.
56. Snyder WE, Evans EW (2006) Ecological effects of invasive arthropod generalist predators. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37: 95-122.
57. Suttle KB, Hoddle MS (2006) Engineering enemy-free space: an invasive pest that kills its predators. Biol Inv 8: 639-649.
58. Trussell GC, Nicklin MO (2002) Cue sensitivity, inducible defense, and trade-offs in a marine snail. Ecology 86: 1635-1647.
59. Trussell GC, Ewanchuk PJ, Matassa CM (2006a) The fear of being eaten reduces energy transfer in a simple food chain. Ecology 87: 2979-2984.
60. Trussell GC, Ewanchuk PJ, Matassa CM (2006b) Habitat effects on the relative importance of trait- and density-mediated indirect interactions. Ecol Lett 9: 1245-1252.
61. Vermeij G (1996) An agenda for invasion biology. Biol Conserv 78: 3-9.
62. Werner EE, Peacor SD (2003) A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84: 1083-1100.
63. Wikstrom SA, Steinarsdottir MB, Kautsky L, Pavia H (2006) Increased chemical resistance explains low herbivore colonization of introduced seaweed. Oecologia 148: 593-601.
64. Wood L (1968) Physiological and ecological aspects of prey selection by the marine gastropod Urosalpinx cinerea (Prosobranchia: Muricidae). Malacologica 6: 267-320.