Transcriptional repression by the Msx1 homeoprotein is associated with global redistribution of the H3K27me3 repressive mark to the nuclear periphery

Nucleus

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  Wang, Jingqiang ^a   Abate Shen, Cory ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Differentiation; Epigenetic chromatin modifiers; Homeoprotein; Msx1, PRC2, Ezh2, H3K27me3; Nuclear periphery; Transcriptional repression

Indexed keywords

H3K27ME3; HISTONE H3; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR MSX1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHROMATIN; COMPLEX FORMATION; DEVELOPMENT; EPIGENETICS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOCATION; GENE REPRESSION; GENE TARGETING;

EID: 84859525784     PISSN: 19491034     EISSN: 19491042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/nucl.3.2.19477     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Lallemand Y, Nicola MA, Ramos C, Bach A, Cloment CS, Robert B. Analysis of Msx1; Msx2 double mutants reveals multiple roles for Msx genes in limb development. Development 2005; 132:3003-14; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.01877
2. Hu G, Lee H, Price SM, Shen MM, Abate-Shen C. Msx homeobox genes inhibit differentiation through upregulation of cyclin D1. Development 2001; 128: 2373-84
3. Odelberg SJ, Kollhoff A, Keating MT. Dedifferentiation of mammalian myotubes induced by msx1. Cell 2000; 103:1099-109; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00212-9
4. Cornelison DD, Olwin BB, Rudnicki MA, Wold BJ. MyoD(-/-) satellite cells in single-fiber culture are differentiation defective and MRF4 deficient. Dev Biol 2000; 224:122-37; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2000.9682
5. Bendall AJ, Abate-Shen C. Roles for Msx and Dlx homeoproteins in vertebrate development. Gene 2000; 247:17-31; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00081-0
6. Houzelstein D, Auda-Boucher G, Chéraud Y, Rouaud T, Blanc I, Tajbakhsh S, et al. The homeobox gene Msx1 is expressed in a subset of somites, and in muscle progenitor cells migrating into the forelimb. Development 1999; 126:2689-701
7. Bendall AJ, Ding J, Hu G, Shen MM, Abate-Shen C. Msx1 antagonizes the myogenic activity of Pax3 in migrating limb muscle precursors. Development 1999; 126:4965-76
8. Catron KM, Wang H, Hu G, Shen MM, Abate-Shen C. Comparison of MSX-1 and MSX-2 suggests a molecular basis for functional redundancy. Mech Dev 1996; 55:185-99; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0925-4773(96)00503-5
9. Woloshin P, Song K, Degnin C, Killary AM, Goldhamer DJ, Sassoon D, et al. MSX1 inhibits myoD expression in fibroblast x 10T1/2 cell hybrids. Cell 1995; 82:611-20; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(95)90033-0
10. Davidson D. The function and evolution of Msx genes: pointers and paradoxes. Trends Genet 1995; 11:405-11; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(00)89124-6
11. Davidson DR, Crawley A, Hill RE, Tickle C. Positiondependent expression of two related homeobox genes in developing vertebrate limbs. Nature 1991; 352:429-31; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/352429a0
12. Lee H, Quinn JC, Prasanth KV, Swiss VA, Economides KD, Camacho MM, et al. PIAS1 confers DNA-binding specificity on the Msx1 homeoprotein. Genes Dev 2006; 20:784-94; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1392006
13. Lee H, Habas R, Abate-Shen C. MSX1 cooperates with histone H1b for inhibition of transcription and myogenesis. Science 2004; 304:1675-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1098096
14. Goldhamer DJ, Brunk BP, Faerman A, King A, Shani M, Emerson CP, Jr. Embryonic activation of themyoD gene is regulated by a highly conserved distal control element. Development 1995; 121:637-49
15. Margueron R, Reinberg D. The Polycomb complex PRC2 and its mark in life. Nature 2011; 469: 343-9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09784
16. Sawarkar R, Paro R. Interpretation of developmental signaling at chromatin: the Polycomb perspective. Dev Cell 2010; 19:651-61; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2010.10.012
17. Schuettengruber B, Cavalli G. Recruitment of polycomb group complexes and their role in the dynamic regulation of cell fate choice. Development 2009; 136: 3531-42; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.033902
18. Cao R, Wang L, Wang H, Xia L, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, et al. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in Polycomb-group silencing. Science 2002; 298:1039-43; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1076997
19. Kuzmichev A, Nishioka K, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Reinberg D. Histone methyltransferase activity associated with a human multiprotein complex containing the Enhancer of Zeste protein. Genes Dev 2002; 16:2893-905; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1035902
20. Schwartz YB, Pirrotta V. Polycomb silencing mechanisms and the management of genomic programmes. Nat Rev Genet 2007; 8:9-22; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg1981
21. Ezhkova E, Lien WH, Stokes N, Pasolli HA, Silva JM, Fuchs E. EZH1 and EZH2 cogovern histone H3K27 trimethylation and are essential for hair follicle homeostasis and wound repair. Genes Dev 2011; 25: 485-98; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.2019811
22. Woo CJ, Kharchenko PV, Daheron L, Park PJ, Kingston RE. A region of the human HOXD cluster that confers polycomb-group responsiveness. Cell 2010; 140:99-110; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.022
23. Mendenhall EM, Koche RP, Truong T, Zhou VW, Issac B, Chi AS, et al. GC-rich sequence elements recruit PRC2 in mammalian ES cells. PLoS Genet 2010; 6:e1001244; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001244
24. Sing A, Pannell D, Karaiskakis A, Sturgeon K, Djabali M, Ellis J, et al. A vertebrate Polycomb response element governs segmentation of the posterior hindbrain. Cell 2009; 138:885-97; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.020
25. Luo L, Gassman KL, Petell LM, Wilson CL, Bewersdorf J, Shopland LS. The nuclear periphery of embryonic stem cells is a transcriptionally permissive and repressive compartment. J Cell Sci 2009; 122: 3729-37; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.052555
26. Ezhkova E, Pasolli HA, Parker JS, Stokes N, Su IH, Hannon G, et al. Ezh2 orchestrates gene expression for the stepwise differentiation of tissue-specific stem cells. Cell 2009; 136:1122-35; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.043
27. Bracken AP, Dietrich N, Pasini D, Hansen KH, Helin K. Genome-wide mapping of Polycomb target genes unravels their roles in cell fate transitions. Genes Dev 2006; 20:1123-36; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.381706
28. Boyer LA, Plath K, Zeitlinger J, Brambrink T, Medeiros LA, Lee TI, et al. Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 2006; 441:349-53; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04733
29. Palacios D, Mozzetta C, Consalvi S, Caretti G, Saccone V, Proserpio V, et al. TNF/p38a/polycomb signaling to Pax7 locus in satellite cells links inflammation to the epigenetic control of muscle regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 2010; 7:455-69; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2010.08.013
30. Caretti G, Di Padova M, Micales B, Lyons GE, Sartorelli V. The Polycomb Ezh2 methyltransferase regulates muscle gene expression and skeletal muscle differentiation. Genes Dev 2004; 18:2627-38; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1241904
31. Rajapakse I, Groudine M. On emerging nuclear order. J Cell Biol 2011; 192:711-21; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201010129
32. Meister P, Mango SE, Gasser SM. Locking the genome: nuclear organization and cell fate. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2011; 21:167-74; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2011.01.023
33. Peric-Hupkes D, Meuleman W, Pagie L, Bruggeman SW, Solovei I, Brugman W, et al. Molecular maps of the reorganization of genome-nuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol Cell 2010; 38: 603-13; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.03.016
34. Eskiw CH, Cope NF, Clay I, Schoenfelder S, Nagano T, Fraser P. Transcription factories and nuclear organization of the genome. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2010; 75:501-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2010.75.046
35. Zhao R, Bodnar MS, Spector DL. Nuclear neighborhoods and gene expression. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2009; 19:172-9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2009.02.007
36. Towbin BD, Meister P, Gasser SM. The nuclear envelope-a scaffold for silencing? Curr Opin Genet Dev 2009; 19:180-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2009.01.006
37. Misteli T. Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function. Cell 2007; 128:787-800; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.028
38. Lanctôt C, Cheutin T, Cremer M, Cavalli G, Cremer T. Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions. Nat Rev Genet 2007; 8:104-15; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2041
39. Fraser P, Bickmore W. Nuclear organization of the genome and the potential for gene regulation. Nature 2007; 447:413-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05916
40. Wang J, Kumar RM, Biggs VJ, Lee H, Chen Y, Kagey MH, et al. The Msx1 Homeoprotein Recruits Polycomb to the Nuclear Periphery during Development. Dev Cell 2011; 21:575-88; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.003
41. Carroll JS, Meyer CA, Song J, Li W, Geistlinger TR, Eeckhoute J, et al. Genome-wide analysis of estrogen receptor binding sites. Nat Genet 2006; 38:1289-97; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng1901
42. Buchberger A, Freitag D, Arnold HH. A homeo-paired domain-binding motif directs Myf5 expression in progenitor cells of limb muscle. Development 2007; 134:1171-80; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.02798
43. Hadchouel J, Carvajal JJ, Daubas P, Bajard L, Chang T, Rocancourt D, et al. Analysis of a key regulatory region upstream of the Myf5 gene reveals multiple phases of myogenesis, orchestrated at each site by a combination of elements dispersed throughout the locus. Development 2003; 130:3415-26; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.00552
44. Bendall AJ, Rincón-Limas DE, Botas J, Abate-Shen C. Protein complex formation between Msx1 and Lhx2 homeoproteins is incompatible with DNA binding activity. Differentiation 1998; 63:151-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-0436.1998.6330151.x
45. Song YJ, Lee H. YB1/p32, a nuclear Y-box binding protein 1, is a novel regulator of myoblast differentiation that interacts with Msx1 homeoprotein. Exp Cell Res 2010; 316:517-29; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.12.003
46. Song YJ, Lee H. PIAS1 negatively regulates ubiquitination of Msx1 homeoprotein independent of its SUMO ligase activity. Mol Cells 2011; 32:221-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10059-011-1020-8
47. Zhang H, Catron KM, Abate-Shen C. A role for the Msx-1 homeodomain in transcriptional regulation: residues in the N-terminal arm mediate TATA binding protein interaction and transcriptional repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93:1764-9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.5.1764
48. Zhang H, Hu G, Wang H, Sciavolino P, Iler N, Shen MM, et al. Heterodimerization of Msx and Dlx homeoproteins results in functional antagonism. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17:2920-32;
49. Margueron R, Reinberg D. Chromatin structure and the inheritance of epigenetic information. Nat Rev Genet 2010; 11:285-96; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2752
50. Singh K, Dilworth FJ. Redirecting traffic in the nucleus. Dev Cell 2011; 21:390-2; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.08.025
51. Guelen L, Pagie L, Brasset E, Meuleman W, Faza MB, Talhout W, et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 2008; 453:948-51; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06947
52. Yao J, Fetter RD, Hu P, Betzig E, Tjian R. Subnuclear segregation of genes and core promoter factors in myogenesis. Genes Dev 2011; 25:569-80; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.2021411