Development of a french-canadian version of the oswestry disability index: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation

Spine

Volumn 37, Issue 7, 2012, Pages

  Denis, Isabelle ^a   Fortin, Luc ^a  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

crosscultural adaptation; low back pain; Oswestry Disability Index; reliability; validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; CULTURAL FACTOR; DISEASE DURATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY;

ADULT; AGED; CANADA; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TRANSLATING;

EID: 84859426620     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318233eaf9     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Punnett L, Wegman DH . Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: The epidemiologic evidence and the debate . J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2004 ; 14 : 13-23 . (Pubitemid 38169101)
2. Merkesdal S, Mau W . Prediction of costs-of-illness in patients with low back pain undergoing orthopedic outpatient rehabilitation . Int J Rehabil Res 2005 ; 28 : 119-26 . (Pubitemid 43193767)
3. Hagen KB, Thune O . Work incapacity from low back pain in the general population . Spine 1998 ; 23 : 2091-5 . (Pubitemid 28485125)
4. Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S . A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally . Spine J 2008 ; 8 : 8-20 . (Pubitemid 350299273)
5. Deyo RA, Andersson G, Bombardier C, et al. Outcome measures for studying patients with low back pain . Spine 1994 ; 19 : 2032 S-6.
6. Fairbank J, Couper J, Davies J, et al. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire . Physiotherapy 1980 ; 66 : 271-3 . (Pubitemid 11234479)
7. Roland M, Morris R . A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain . Spine 1983 ; 8 : 141-4 . (Pubitemid 13089565)
8. Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M, et al. The Quebec back pain disability scale. Measurement properties . Spine 1995 ; 20 : 341-52 .
9. Hutchinson A, Bentzen N, Konig-Zahn C . Cross-Cultural Health Outcome Assessment: A User's Guide . Groningen, The Netherlands : European Research Group on Health Outcomes 1996 .
10. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures . Spine 2000 ; 25 : 3186-91 . (Pubitemid 32042951)
11. Osthus H, Cziske R, Jacobi E . Cross-cultural adaptation of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index and evaluation of its measurement properties . Spine 2006 ; 31 : E448-53 .
12. Mannion AF, Junge A, Fairbank JC, et al. Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 1: crosscultural adaptation, reliability, and validity . Eur Spine J 2006 ; 15 : 55-65 . (Pubitemid 43199173)
13. Guermazi M, Mezghani M, Ghroubi S, et al. The Oswestry index for low back pain translated into Arabic and validated in an Arab population . Ann Readapt Med Phys 2005 ; 48 : 1-10 . (Pubitemid 40128163)
14. Lue YJ, Hsieh CL, Huang MH, et al. Development of a Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index version 2 . 1 . Spine 2008 ; 33 : 2354-60 .
15. Kim DY, Lee SH, Lee HY, et al. Validation of the Korean version of the Oswestry disability index . Spine 2005 ; 30 : E123-7 .
16. Lauridsen HH, Hartvigsen J, Manniche C, et al. Danish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Part 2: sensitivity, specifi city and clinically signifi cant improvement in two low back pain populations . Eur Spine J 2006 ; 15 : 1717-28 . (Pubitemid 44704867)
17. Boscainos PJ, Sapkas G, Stilianessi E, et al. Greek versions of the Oswestry and Roland-Morris disability questionnaires . Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003 ; 411 : 40-53 . (Pubitemid 36667260)
18. Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Mehdian H, et al. The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions . Spine 2006 ; 31 : E454-9 .
19. Monticone M, Baiardi P, Ferrari S, et al. Development of the Italian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI-I): A cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity study . Spine 2009 ; 34 : 2090-5 .
20. Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK . Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index . J Rehabil Med 2003 ; 35 : 241-7 . (Pubitemid 37265112)
21. Vigatto R, Alexandre NM, Correa Filho HR . Development of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity . Spine 2007 ; 32 : 481-6 .
22. Sakulsriprasert P, Vachalathiti R, Vongsirinavarat M, et al. Crosscultural adaptation of modifi ed Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire to Thai and its reliability . J Med Assoc Thai 2006 ; 89 : 1694-701 . (Pubitemid 44747542)
23. Yakut E, Düger T, Oksüz C, et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain . Spine 2004 ; 29 : 581-5 . (Pubitemid 38282621)
24. Vogler D, Paillex R, Norberg M, et al. Cross-cultural validation of the Oswestry Disability Index in French . Ann Readapt Med Phys 2008 ; 51 : 379-85 .
25. Roland M, Fairbank J . The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire . Spine 2000 ; 25 : 3115-24 . (Pubitemid 32042943)
26. Fairbank J, Pynsent P . The Oswestry Disability Index . Spine 2000 ; 25 : 2940-53 .
27. Coste J, Le Parc JM, Berge E, et al. Validation francaise d'une échelle d'incapacité fonctionnelle pour l'évaluation des lombalgies (EIFEL) [French validation of a disability rating scale for the evaluation of low back pain (EIFEL questionnaire)] . Rev Rhum Ed Fr 1993 ; 60 : 335-41 .
28. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, et al. The Sickness Impact Profi le: development and fi nal revision of health status measure . Med Care 1981 ; 19 : 787-805 . (Pubitemid 11021288)
29. Kopec JA, Esdaile JM . Functional disability scales for back pain . Spine 1995 ; 20 : 1943-9 .
30. Hsieh C, Phillips R, Adams A, et al. . Functional outcomes of low back pain: comparison of four treatment groups in a randomized clinical trial . J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1992 ; 15 : 4-9 .
31. Järvikoski A, Mellin G, Estlander A, et al. Outcome of two multimodal back treatment programs with and without intensive physical training . J Spinal Disord 1993 ; 6 : 93-8 . (Pubitemid 23113634)
32. Johansson E, Lindberg P . Subacute and chronic low back pain. Reliability and validity of a Swedish version of the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire . Scand J Rehabil Med 1998 ; 30 : 139-43 . (Pubitemid 28416920)
33. Leclaire R, Blier F, Fortin L, et al. A cross-sectional study comparing the Oswestry and Roland-Morris Functional Disability scales in two populations of patients with low back pain of different levels of severity . Spine 1997 ; 22 : 68-71 . (Pubitemid 27044838)
34. Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P, et al. Assessing change over time in patients with low back pain . Phys Ther 1994 ; 74 : 528-33 . (Pubitemid 24177846)
35. Streiner DL, Norman GR . Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use . Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press 1989 .
36. Shrout PE, Fleiss J . Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability . Psychol Bull 1979 ; 86 : 420-8 .
37. Feise RJ, Menke JM . Functional rating index: A new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions . Spine 2001 ; 26 : 78-86 .
38. Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M, et al. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: conceptualization and development . J Clin Epidemiol 1996 ; 49 : 151-61 . (Pubitemid 26123926)
39. Fortin L, Raymond D, Raynauld JP, et al. L'évaluation de la fi abilité et de la validité d'un instrument de mesure . J Réadapt Méd 1996 ; 16 : 112-8 .