Validation of the Turkish Version of the Oswestry Disability Index for Patients with Low Back Pain

Spine

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 581-585

  Yakut, Edibe ^a   Düger, Tülin ^a   Öksüz, Çiǧdem ^a   Yörükan, Selma ^a   Üreten, Kemal ^a   Turan, Deran ^a   Firat, Tüzün ^a   Kiraz, Sedat ^a   Kirdi, Nuray ^a   Kayihan, Hülya ^a   Yakut, Yavuz ^a   Güler, Çaǧatay ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Disability; Low back pain; Oswestry disability index; Turkish version

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; ROLAND MORRIS DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE; SCHOBER TEST; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); VALIDATION PROCESS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; AGED; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TURKEY;

EID: 10744231502     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000113869.13209.03     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Davidson M, Keating JL. A comparison of five low back pain disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther. 2002;82:8-24.
2. Deyo R, Diehl A. Measuring physical and psychological function in patients with low back pain. Spine. 1983;8:635-642.
3. Fritz JM. Use of a classification approach to the treatment of 3 patients with low back syndrome. Phys Ther. 1998;78:766-777.
4. Fritz JM, Erhard RE, Vignovic M. A nonsurgical treatment approach for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Phys Ther. 1997;77:962-973.
5. Kerssens JJ, Sluijs EM, Verhaak PFM, et al. Back care instructions in physical therapy: a trend analysis of individualized back care programs. Phys Ther. 1999;79:286-295.
6. Mielenz TJ, Carey TS, Dyrek DA, et al. Physical therapy utilization by patients with acute low back pain. Phys Ther. 1997;77:1040-1051.
7. Robinson ME, Greene AF, O'Connor P, et al. Reliability of lumbar isometric torque in patients with chronic low back pain. Phys Ther. 1992;72:186-190.
8. Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ. A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther. 2001;81:776-788.
9. Schoppink LEM, Tulder MW, Koes BW, et al. Reliability and Validity of the Dutch Adaptation of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther. 1996;76:268-275.
10. Atlas SJ, Deyo RA, Patrick DL, et al. The Quebec Task Force Classification for spinal disorders and the severity, treatment, and outcomes of sciatica and lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1996;21:2885-2892.
11. Bombardier C, Hayden J, Beaton DE. Minimal clinically important difference. Low back pain: outcome measures. J Rheumatol. 2001;28:431-438.
12. Chan CW, Goldman S, Ilstrup DM, et al. The pain drawing and Waddell's nonorganic physical signs in chronic low-back pain. Spine. 1993;18:1717-1722.
13. Garratt AM, Moffett JK, Farrin AJ. Responsiveness of generic and specific measures of health outcome in low back pain. Spine. 2001;26:71-77.
14. Lee CE, Simmonds MJ, Novy DM, et al. Self-reports and clinician-measured physical function among patients with low back pain: a comparison. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:227-231.
15. Pratt RK, Fairbank JCT, Virr A. The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 2002;27:84-91.
16. Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine. 2000;25:3115-3124.
17. Stratford P, Solomon P, Binkley J, et al. Sensitivity of Sickness Impact Profile items to measure change over time in a low-back pain patient group. Spine. 1993;18:1723-1727.
18. Waddell G. Clinical assessment of lumbar impairment. Clin Orthop. 1987;221:110-120.
19. Waddell G, Somerville D, Henderson I, et al. Objective clinical evaluation of physical impairment in chronic low back pain. Spine. 1992;17:617-628.
20. Wiesinger GF, Nuhr M, Quittan M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Roland-Morris Questionnaire for German-speaking patients with low back pain. Spine. 1999;24:1099-1103.
21. Estevee-Vives J, Batlle-Gualda E, Reig A, et al. Spanish version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire: reliability, validity and transcultural equivalency. J Rheumatol. 1993;20:2116-2122.
22. Fairbank JCT, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine. 2000;25:2940-2953.
23. Kovacs FM, Llobera J, Real MTG, et al. Validation of the Spanish version of the Roland-Morris Questionnaire. Spine. 2002;27:538-542.
24. Küçükdeveci AA, Tennant A, Elhan AH, et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for use in low back pain. Spine. 2001;26:2738-2743.
25. Fairbank J, Couper J, Davies J, et al. The Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980;66:271-273.
26. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186-3191.
27. Shrout PE, Fleiss J. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420-428.
28. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundation of Clinical Research: Application to Practice. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange, 1993.
29. De Jong Z, van der Heijde D, McKenna SP, et al. The reliability and construct validity of the RAQoL: a rheumatoid arthritis-specific quality of life instrument. Br J Rheumatol. 1997;36:878-883.
30. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297-334.
31. Bellamy N. Musculoskeletal Clinical Metrology. Boston: Klumer Academic, 1993:11-43.
32. Engelberg R, Martin DP, Agel J, et al. Musculoskeletal function assessment instrument: criterion and construct validity. J Orthop Res. 1996;14:182-192.
33. Feise RJ, Menke JM. Functional Rating Index: a new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions. Spine. 2001;26:78-87.
34. Fisher K, Johnson M. Validation of the Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire, its sensitivity as a measure of change following treatment and its relationship with order aspects of the chronic pain experience. Physiother Theory Pract. 1997;13:67-80.
35. Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M, et al. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: conceptualization and development. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:151-161.
36. Gronblad M, Hurri H, Kouri JP. Relationships between spinal mobility, physical performance tests, pain intensity and disability assessments in chronic low back pain patients. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1997;29:17-24.
37. Gronblad M, Hupli M, Wennerstand P, et al. Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients. Clin J Pain. 1993;9:189-195.
38. Jacob T, Baras M, Zeev A, et al. Low back pain: reliability of a set of pain measurement tools. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:735-742.
39. Bartie MC, Bigos SJ, Fisher LD, et al. The role of spinal flexibility in back pain complains within industry: a prospective study. Spine. 1990;15:768-773.
40. Sjolie AN, Ljunggren AE. The significance of high lumbar mobility and low lumbar strength for current and future low back pain in adolescents. Spine. 2001;26:2629-2636.
41. Kröner-Herwig B, Jäckle C, Frettlöh J. Predicting subjective disability in chronic pain patients. Int J Behav Med. 1996;3:30-41.
42. Rainville J, Ahern DK, Phalen L. The association of pain with physical activities in chronic low back pain. Spine. 1992;17:1060-1064.