Cross-cultural adaptation of modified oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire to Thai and its reliability

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand

Volumn 89, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1694-1701

  Sakulsriprasert, Prasert ^a   Vachalathiti, Roongtiwa ^a   Vongsirinavarat, Mantana ^a   Kantasorn, Juthamard ^a  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Cross cultural translation; Low Back Pain; Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CULTURAL FACTOR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; LOW BACK PAIN; OSWETRY LOW BACK PAIN DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; THAILAND;

ADULT; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; THAILAND;

EID: 33750996457     PISSN: 01252208     EISSN: 01252208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Salive ME, Mayfield JA, Weissman NW. Patient Outcomes Research Teams and the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Health Serv Res 1990; 25: 697-708.
2. Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ. A comparison of a modified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire and the Quebec back pain disability scale. Phys Ther 2001; 81: 776-88.
3. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980; 66: 271-3.
4. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain 1996; 65: 71-6.
5. Leclaire R, Blier F, Fortin L, Proulx R. A cross-sectional study comparing the Oswestry and Roland-Morris functional disability scales in two populations of patients with low back pain of different levels of severity. Spine 1997; 22: 68-71.
6. Davidson M, Keating JL. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 8-24.
7. Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P, Gill C, Finch E. Assessing change over time in patients with low back pain. Phys Ther 1994; 74: 528-33.
8. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain 1996; 65: 71-6.
9. Fujiwara A, Kobayashi N, Saiki K, Kitagawa T, Tamai K, Saotome K. Association of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score with the Oswestry disability index, Roland-Morris disability questionnaire, and short-form 36. Spine 2003; 28: 1601-7.
10. Kim DY, Lee SH, Lee HY, Lee HJ, Chang SB, Chung SK, et al. Validation of the Korean version of the Oswestry disability index. Spine 2005; 30: E123-7.
11. Boscainos PJ, Sapkas G, Stilianessi E, Prouskas K, Papadakis SA. Greek versions of the Oswestry and Roland-Morris disability questionnaires. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 40-53.
12. Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index. J Rehabil Med 2003; 35: 241-7.
13. Yakut E, Duger T, Oksuz C, Yorukan S, Ureten K, Turan D, et al. Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry disability index for patients with low back pain. Spine 2004; 29: 581-5.
14. nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 2000: 560-2.
15. Baker D, Pynsent P, Fairbank J. The Oswestry disability index revisited: its reliability, repeatability, and validity, and a comparison with the St Thomas disability index. In: Roland M, Jenner J, editors. Back pain: new approaches to rehabilitation and education. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1989: 174-86.