Developing expertise: How enactivism re-frames mathematics teacher development

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 861-873

  Brown, Laurinda ^a   Coles, Alf ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Awareness; Collaborative group; Enactivism; Expertise; Mathematics teacher development; Purposes

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859264283     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-011-0343-4     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Belenky, M., Clichy, B., Goldberger, N., & Tarule, J. (1997). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
2. Brown, L. (2005). Purposes, metacommenting and basic-level categories: Parallels between teaching mathematics and learning to teach mathematics. Paper presented at the 15th ICMI Study Conference. From http://stwww.weizmann.ac.il/G-math/ICMI/log_in.html.
3. Brown, L., & Coles, A. (2000). Complex decision making in the classroom: The teacher as an intuitive practitioner. In T. Atkinson& G. Claxton (Eds.), The intuitive practitioner: On the value of not always knowing what one is doing (pp. 165-181). Buckingham: Open University Press.
4. Brown, L., & Coles, A. (2010). Mathematics teacher and mathematics teacher educator change-Insight through theoretical perspectives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(5), 375-382.
5. Brown, L., & Reid, D. (2006). Embodied cognition: Somatic markers, purposes and emotional orientations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 179-192.
6. Brown, L., Hewitt, D., & Tahta, D. (1989). A Gattegno Anthology. Derby: Association of Teachers of Mathematics.
7. Damasio, A. (1996). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. London: Macmillan.
8. Davis, B., Brown, L., Cedillo, T., Chiocca, C.-M., Dawson, S., Gimenez, J., et al. (2009). Development of teaching in and from practice. In R. Even & D. Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics: The 15th ICMI study. New York: Springer.
9. Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. New York: Routledge.
10. Gattegno, C. (1971). What we owe children: The subordination of teaching to learning. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
11. Gattegno, C. (1987). The science of education. Part 1: Theoretical considerations. Reading: Education Solutions.
12. Hewitt, D. (1999). Arbitrary and necessary. Part 1: A way of viewing the mathematics curriculum. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(3), 2-9.
13. Hodgen, J. (2005). Motivation, desire and teacher change in primary mathematics. Paper presented at The 15th ICMI Study Conference. From http://stwww.weizmann.ac.il/G-math/ICMI/log_in.html.
14. Huang, R., & Li, Y. (2009). Pursuing excellence in mathematics classroom instruction through exemplary lesson development in China: A case study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41, 297-309.
15. Huberman, M. (1999). The mind is its own place: The influence of sustained interactivity with practitioners on educational researchers. Harvard Educational Review, 69(3), 289-319.
16. Jaworski, B. (2003). Research practice into/influencing mathematics teaching and learning development: Towards a theoretical framework based on co-learning partnership. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 249-282.
17. Juarrero, A. (2002). Dynamics in action: Intentional behaviour as a complex system. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
18. Maturana, H. (1988). Reality: The search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 25-88.
19. Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambala.
20. Raymond, A., & Leinenbach, M. (2000). Collaborative action research on the learning and teaching of algebra: A story of one mathematics teacher's development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, 283-307.
21. St. Julien, J. (1997). Explaining learning: The research trajectory of situated cognition and the implications of connectionism. In D. Kirshner & J. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic and psychological perspectives (pp. 261-279). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Stewart, J. (2011). Foundational issues in enaction as a paradigm for cognitive science: From the origins of life to consciousness and writing. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Towards a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 1-88). Massachusetts: MIT Press.
23. Stroh Becvar, D., & Becvar, R. (2000). Family therapy: A systemic integration. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
24. Varela, F. (1999). Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom, and cognition. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
25. Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
26. von Bertalanffy, L. (1969). General system theory. New York: George Braziller.
27. Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of education research: A framework for reconsidering research-practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 13-22.
28. White, A., & Lim, C. (2008). Lesson study in Asia Pacific classrooms: Local responses to a global movement. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40, 915-925.