Rapid interactions between lexical semantic and word form analysis during word recognition in context: Evidence from ERPs

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1104-1112

  Kim, Albert ^a   Lai, Vicky ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSONANT; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; VISUAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; TIME FACTORS; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84859116585     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00148     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Altmann, G. T. M., & Mirković, J. (2009). Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cognitive Science, 33, 583-609.
2. Bentin, S., McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 343-355.
3. Bentin, S., Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Giard, M. H., Echallier, J. F., & Pernier, J. (1999). ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: Time course and scalp distribution. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 235-260.
4. Dambacher, M., Rolfs, M., Göllner, K., Kliegl, R., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Event-related potentials reveal rapid verification of predicted visual input. PLoS ONE, 4, e5047.
5. Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 335-341.
6. Dell'Acqua, R., Sessa, P., Peressotti, F., Mulatti, C., Navarrete, E., & Grainger, J. (2010). ERP evidence for ultra-fast semantic processing in the picture-word interference paradigm. Frontiers in Language Sciences, 1, 177.
7. DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117-1121.
8. Dikker, S., & Pylkkanen, L. (2011). Before the N400: Effects of lexical-semantic violations in visual cortex. Brain and Language, 118, 23-28.
9. Dikker, S., Rabagliati, H., Farmer, T. A., & Pylkkänen, L. (2010). Early occipital sensitivity to syntactic category is based on form typicality. Psychological Science, 21, 629-634.
10. Dikker, S., Rabagliati, H., & Pylkkänen, L. (2009). Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex. Cognition, 110, 293-321.
11. Epshtein, B., Lifshitz, I., & Ullman, S. (2008). Image interpretation by a single bottom-up top-down cycle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 105, 14298-14303.
12. Foxe, J. J., & Simpson, G. V. (2002). Timecourse of activation flow from V1 to frontal cortex in humans: A framework for defining "early" visual processing. Experimental Brain Research, 142, 139-150.
13. Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 128-156.
14. Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95-112.
15. Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304, 438-441.
16. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662-720.
17. Hauk, O., Davis, M. H., Ford, M., Pulvermüller, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2006). The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. Neuroimage, 30, 1383-1400.
18. Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 1090-1103.
19. Holcomb, P. J. (1993). Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: Implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. Psychophysiology, 30, 47-61.
20. Holcomb, P. J., Grainger, J., O'Rourke, T. (2002). An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 938-950.
21. Kim, A., & Pitkänen, I. (submitted). Parametric effects of orthographic structural regularity on the P600.
22. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
23. Lamme, V. A., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, 571-579.
24. Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2009). A beautiful day in the neighborhood: An event-related potential study of lexical relationships and prediction in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 326-338.
25. Mariol, M., Jacques, C., Schelstraete, M., & Rossion, B. (2008). The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: Electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1283-1299.
26. Maurer, U., Brandeis, D., & McCandliss, B. D. (2005). Fast, visual specialization for reading in English revealed by the topography of the N170 ERP response. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 1, 13.
27. McCandliss, B. D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2003). The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 293-299.
28. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
29. McLaughlin, J., Osterhout, L., & Kim, A. (2004). Neural correlates of second-language word learning: Minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 703-704.
30. Nobre, A., Allison, T., & McCarthy, G. (1994). Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe. Nature, 372, 260-263.
31. O'Reilly, R. C. (1998). Six principles for biologically based computational models of cortical cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 455-462.
32. Penolazzi, B., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2007). Early semantic context integration and lexical access as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Biological Psychology, 74, 374-388.
33. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
34. Pylkkänen, L., & Marantz, A. (2003). Tracking the time course of word recognition with MEG. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 187-189.
35. Pylkkänen, L., Stringfellow, A., & Marantz, A. (2002). Neuromagnetic evidence for the timing of lexical activation: An MEG component sensitive to phonotactic probability but not to neighborhood density. Brain and Language, 81, 666-678.
36. Reppen, R., & Ide, N. (2004). The American National Corpus: Overall goals and the first release. Journal of English Linguistics, 32, 105-113.
37. Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999). Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1019-1025.
38. Rolls, E. T., & Tovee, M. J. (1994). Processing speed in the cerebral cortex and the neurophysiology of visual masking. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 257, 9-15.
39. Sauseng, P., Bergmann, J., & Wimmer, H. (2004). When does the brain register deviances from standard word spellings? An ERP study. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 529-532.
40. Schroeder, C. E., Mehta, A. D., & Foxe, J. J. (2001). Determinants and mechanisms of attentional modulation of neural processing. Frontiers in Bioscience, 6, D672-D684.
41. Schroeder, C. E., Mehta, A. D., & Givre, S. J. (1998). A spatiotemporal profile of visual system activation revealed by current source density analysis in the awake macaque. Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY: 1991), 8, 575-592.
42. Semlitsch, H. V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P., & Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 23, 695-703.
43. Sereno, S. C., Brewer, C. C., & O'Donnell, P. J. (2003). Context effects in word recognition. Psychological Science, 14, 328-333.
44. Sereno, S. C., & Rayner, K. (2003). Measuring word recognition in reading: Eye movements and event-related potentials. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 489-493.
45. Solomyak, O., & Marantz, A. (2009). Lexical access in early stages of visual word processing: A single-trial correlational MEG study of heteronym recognition. Brain and Language, 108, 191-196.
46. Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337-359.
47. Tarkiainen, A., Helenius, P., Hansen, P. C., Cornelissen, P. L., & Salmelin, R. (1999). Dynamics of letter string perception in the human occipitotemporal cortex. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 122, 2119-2132.
48. Tovée, M. J. (1994). Neuronal processing. How fast is the speed of thought? Current Biology: CB, 4, 1125-1127.
49. Twomey, T., Kawabata Duncan, K. J., Price, C. J., & Devlin, J. T. (2011). Top-down modulation of ventral occipito-temporal responses during visual word recognition. Neuroimage, 55, 1242-1251.
50. van de Meerendonk, N., Indefrey, P., Chwilla, D. J., & Kolk, H. H. (2011).Monitoring in language perception: Electrophysiological and hemodynamic responses to spelling violations. Neuroimage, 54, 2350-2363.
51. Vinckier, F., Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Dubus, J. P., Sigman, M., & Cohen, L. (2007). Hierarchical coding of letter strings in the ventral stream: Dissecting the inner organization of the visual word form system. Neuron, 55, 143-156.
52. Vissers, C., Chwilla, D., & Kolk, H. (2006). Monitoring in language perception: The effect of misspellings of words in highly constrained sentences. Brain Research, 1106, 150-163.