Has the California Tobacco Control Program reduced smoking?

JAMA

Volumn 280, Issue 10, 1998, Pages 893-899

  Pierce, John P ^a   Gilpin, Elizabeth A ^a   Emery, Sherry L ^a   White, Martha M ^b   Rosbrook, Brad ^b   Berry, Charles C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERTIZING; ARTICLE; CIGARETTE SMOKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FINANCE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032500290     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.10.893     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. 1.US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Smoking and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Office on Smoking and Health; 1979. DHEW publication PHS 79-50066.
2. National Cancer Institute. Strategies to Control Tobacco Use in the United States: A Blueprint for Public Health Action in the 1900's. Bethesda, lid: National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 1992. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 1. NIH publication 92-3316.
3. Farquhar JW, Fortmann SP, Flora JA, et al. The Stanford Five-City Project: effects of communitywide education on cardiovascular disease risk factors. JAMA. 1990;264:359-365.
4. Egger G, Fitzgerald W, Frape G, et al. Results of large scale media antismoking campaign in Australia: North Coast "Quit for Life" programme. BMJ. 1985;287:1125-1128.
5. Dwyer T, Pierce JP, Hannan CD, Burke N. Evaluation of the Sydney "Quit for Life" anti-smoking campaign, II: changes in smoking prevalence. Med J Aust. 1986;144:344-347.
6. The COMMIT Research Group. Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT), I: cohort results from a four-year community intervention. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:183-192.
7. Pierce JP, Burns DM, Berry C, et al. Reducing tobacco consumption in California: Proposition 99 seems to work. JAMA. 1991 05:1257-1258.
8. Klausner R. The evolution of tobacco control studies at the National Cancer Institute. Tob Control. 1998;6(suppl 2):S1-S2.
9. Bai DG, Kizer KW, Felton PG, Mozar HN, Neimeyer D. Reducing tobacco consumption in California: development of a statewide antitobacco use campaign. JAMA. 1990;264:1570-1574.
10. US Department of Health and Human Services. Reducing the Health Consequences of Smoking: 25 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General, 1989. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1989. Publication CDC 89-8411.
11. Pierce JP, Macaskill P, Hill D. Long-term effectiveness of mass media led antismoking campaigns in Australia. Am J Public Health. 1990;80:565-569.
12. The Tobacco Institute. Monthly State Cigarette Tax Reports, February 1983-June 1997. Washington, DC: Tobacco Institute; 1997.
13. US Bureau of Census. Resident Population for Selected Age Groups: 1800-1989. Washington, DC: US Bureau of the Census, Population Distribution Branch; 1990.
14. US Bureau of Census. Resident Population for Selected Age Groups: 1990-1996. Washington, DC: US Bureau of the Census, Population Distribution Branch; 1996.
15. Becker R A, Chambers JM, Wilks AR. The New S Language: A Programming Environment for Data Analysis and Graphics. Pacific Grove, Calif: Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole; 1988.
16. Cleveland WS, Devlin SJ. Calendar effects in monthly time series: modeling and adjustments. JAin Stat Assoc. 1982;77:520-528.
17. Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH. Applied Linear Statistical Models: Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Designs. 2nd ed. Homewood, 111: Richard D Invin Ine; 1985.
18. SAS Institute Inc. SAS Systemfor Regression. 2nd éd. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Ine; 1991.
19. Pierce JP, Fiore MC, Novotny TE, Hatziandreu E, Davis R. Trends in cigarette smoking in the United States: projections to the year 2000. JAMA. 1989 61:01-65.
20. Gilpin EA, Pierce JP, Cavin SW, et al. Estimates of population smoking prevalence: self vs proxy reports of smoking status. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1576-1579.
21. Pierce JP, Gilpin EA, Emory SL, et al. Tobacco Control in California: Who's Winning the War? An Evaluation of the Tobacco Control Program, 1989-1990. La Jolla: University of California, San Diego; 1998.
22. Giovino GA, Schooley MW, Zhu B-P, et al. Surveillance for selected tobacco-use behaviors-United States, 1900-1994. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1994;43(88-3):1-43.
23. California Department of Health Sen-ices. California Adult Tobacco Survey SAS Dataset Documentation and Technical Report, 1993-91. Sacramento: Cancer Surveillance Section, California Dept of Health Services; 1994.
24. Hansen RH. The Current Population Survey: Design and Methodology. Washington, DC: US
25. Dept of Commerce, Bureau of the Census; July 1995. Technical paper 40.
26. Shopland DS, Hartman AM, Gibson JT, Mueller MD, Kessler LG, Lynn WR. Cigarette smoking among US adults by state and region: estimates from the current population survey. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88:1748-1758.
27. Shapiro E. Cigarette burn: Philip Morris price cut on Marlboro jolts industry and upsets rosy profit assumptions. Wall Street Jounial. April 5,1993:A1,A10.
28. Goldman LK, Glantz SA. Evaluation of antismoking advertising campaigns. JAMA. 1998;279: 772-777.
29. Skolnick AA. Court orders California governor to restore antismoking media campaign funding. JAMA. 1992;267:2721-2723.
30. Lewit EM, Coate D. The potential for using excise taxes to reduce smoking. J Health Econ. 1982;1:121-145.
31. Manley MW, Pierce JP, Gilpin EA, Rosbrook B, Berry C, Wun LM. Impact of the American Stop Smoking Intervention Study on cigarette consumption. Tob Control. 1998;G(suppl2):S5-Sll.
32. Balbach ED, Monardi FM, Fox BJ, Glantz SA. Holding Government Accountable: Tobacco Policy Making in Califomia,1995-1997.Snn Francisco: Institute for Health Policy Studies, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco; 1997.
33. US Federal Trade Commission. Federal Trade Commission Report to Congress: Pursuant to the Federal Cigarettes Labeling and Advertising Act. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission; 1997.
34. Fle\velling RL, Kenney E, Elder JP, Pierce JP, Hohnson M, Bal DG. First-year impact of the California cigarette tax increase on cigarette consumption. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:867-869.
35. Pierce JP, Evans N, Farkas AJ, et al. Tobacco Use in Califoma: An Evaluation of the Tobacco Control Program, 1989-1993. La Jolla: University of California, San Diego; 1994.
36. Chilcote SD. Memoranda to Members of the Executive Committee of the Tobacco Institute. Washington, DC: Tobacco Institute; April 18,1990.
37. Lynch BS, Bonnie RJ, eds. Groimig Up Tobacco Free: Preventing Nicotine Addiction in Children and Youth. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1995.
38. Manley M, Lynn W, Epps RP, Grande D, Glynn T, Shopland D. The American Stop Smoking Intervention Study (ASSIST) for Cancer Prevention: an overview. Tob Control. 1997;6(suppl 2):S12-S16.
39. Harris JE, Connolly GN, Brooks D, Davis B. Cigarette smoking before and after an excise tax increase and an antismokingcampaign-Massachusetts, 1990-1996. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1996;45:966-970.
40. Tray nor MP, Glantz S A. California's tobacco tax initiative: the development and passage of Proposition 99. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996;21:543-585.
41. Heisner PF, Begay ME. The campaign to raise the tobacco tax in Massachusetts. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:968-973.