Acceptance of technology-enhanced learning for a theoretical radiological science course: A randomized controlled trial

BMC Medical Education

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Nkenke, Emeka ^a   Vairaktaris, Elefterios ^b   Bauersachs, Anne ^a   Eitner, Stephan ^a   Budach, Alexander ^a   Knipfer, Christoph ^a   Stelzle, Florian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSUMER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL EDUCATION; EDUCATION; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TEACHING; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; EDUCATION, DENTAL; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; RADIOLOGY; TEACHING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84859061059     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726920     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-18     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Implementing e-learning in a radiological science course in dental education: a short-term longitudinal study. Tan PL, Hay DB, Whaites E, J Dent Educ 2009 73 1202 1212 19805785
2. The onrush of technology in education: the professor. Cornell R, Educational Technology 1999 39 60 64
3. Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Garrison D, Kanuka H, The Internet and Higher Education 2004 7 95 105 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
4. Teaching, technology and talk: Psychology and advanced learning ought to go well together. Mayes T, Psychologist 1998 11 375 377 (Pubitemid 128109971)
5. Student perceptions of an online dental terminology course. Grimes EB, J Dent Educ 2002 66 100 107 12358096
6. Web-based orthodontic instruction and assessment. Komolpis R, Johnson RA, J Dent Educ 2002 66 650 658 12056770
7. Dentocase -open-source education management system in dentistry. Peroz I, Seidel O, Boning K, Bosel C, Schutte U, Int J Comput Dent 2004 7 169 177 15516095 (Pubitemid 39220724)
8. Online learning in dentistry: an overview of the future direction for dental education. Schonwetter DJ, Reynolds PA, Eaton KA, De Vries J, J Oral Rehabil 2010 37 927 940 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02122.x 20726942
9. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD, MIS Quaterly 2003 27 425 478
10. Using a modified technology acceptance model in hospitals. Aggelidis VP, Chatzoglou PD, Int J Med Inform 2009 78 115 126 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.006 18675583
11. Evaluating a blended-learning course taught to different groups of learners in a dental school. Pahinis K, Stokes CW, Walsh TF, Cannavina G, J Dent Educ 2007 71 269 278 17314389
12. Distance education in the U.S. and Canadian undergraduate dental curriculum. Andrews KG, Demps EL, J Dent Educ 2003 67 427 438 12749572
13. Electronic curriculum implementation at North American dental schools. Hendricson WD, Panagakos F, Eisenberg E, McDonald J, Guest G, Jones P, et al. J Dent Educ 2004 68 1041 1057 15466056
14. The dental curriculum at North American dental institutions in 2002-03: a survey of current structure, recent innovations, and planned changes. Kassebaum DK, Hendricson WD, Taft T, Haden NK, J Dent Educ 2004 68 914 931 15342652
15. A blended learning course taught to different groups of learners in a dental school: follow-up evaluation. Pahinis K, Stokes CW, Walsh TF, Tsitrou E, Cannavina G, J Dent Educ 2008 72 1048 1057 18768447
16. E-learning: is the revolution over? Ellaway R, Medical Teacher 2011 33 297 302 10.3109/0142159X.2011.550968 21456987
17. The effect of reminder letters on the uptake of an e-learning programme on dementia: a randomized trial in general practice. Waldorff FB, Siersma V, Nielsen B, Steenstrup AP, Bro F, Fam Pract 2009 26 466 471 10.1093/fampra/cmp072 19858123
18. The continuing medical education activities and attitudes of Australian doctors working in different clinical specialities and practice locations. Stewart GD, Khadra MH, Aust Health Rev 2009 33 47 56 10.1071/AH090047 19203333
19. The failure of e-learning research to inform educational practice, and what we can do about it. Cook DA, Medical Teacher 2009 31 158 162 10.1080/01421590802691393 19330674
20. How to randomise. Altman DG, Bland JM, Br Med J 1999 319 703 704 (Pubitemid 29423963)
21. Successful implementation of e-learning: pedagogical considerations. Govindasamy T, The Internet and Higher Education 2001 4 287 299 10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00071-9 (Pubitemid 33736111)
22. Das Trierer Inventar zur Lehrevaluation (TRIL). Arbeitskreis" Lehrevaluation" im Fach Psychologie. Gläer E, Gollwitzer M, Kranz D, Schlotz W, Schnell T, Voss A, Universität Trier 2004 http://www.uni- koblenzlandaude/methodenzentrum/QS/tril2bm1c.pdf (accessed on 2011-04-03) 22474892
23. Internet-based education. Bove AA, Perspect Biol Med 2008 51 61 70 18192766
24. Self-assessed learning style correlates to use supplemental learning materials in an online course management system. Halbert C, Kriebel R, Cuzzolino R, Coughlin P, Fresa-Dillon K, Medical Teacher 2011 33 331 333 10.3109/0142159X.2011.542209 21456993
25. A cognitive perspective on technology enhanced learning in medical training: great opportunities, pitfalls and challenges. Dror I, Schmidt P, O'Connor L, Medical Teacher 2011 33 291 296 10.3109/0142159X.2011.550970 21456986
26. It appeared to be a good idea at the time but. A few steps closer to understanding how technology can enhance teaching and learning in medical education. Sandars J, Medical Teacher 2011 33 265 267 10.3109/0142159X.2011. 550972 21456982
27. Key steps for integrating a basic science throughout a medical school curriculum using an e-learning approach. Dubois EA, Franson KL, Medical Teacher 2009 31 822 828 10.1080/01421590903147584 19811187
28. The effect of previous exposure to technology on acceptance and its importance in usability and accessibility engineering. Holzinger A, Searle G, Wernbacher M, Universal Access in the Information Society 2011 10 245 260 10.1007/s10209-010-0212-x
29. Dependable domestic systems design: a socio-technical approach. Sommerville I, Dewsbury G, Interacting with Computers 2007 19 438 456 10.1016/j.intcom.2007.05.002 (Pubitemid 47002273)
30. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Davis FD, MIS Quaterly 1989 13 319 339 10.2307/249008
31. ser acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Davis FD, International Journal of Man-machine Studies 1993 38 475 487 10.1006/imms.1993.1022
32. Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Hu P, Chau P, Tam K, Journal of Management Information Systems 1999 16 91 112 (Pubitemid 32716799)
33. Creating an e-learning module from learning objects using a commentary or 'personal learning assistant'. Harden RM, Gessner IH, Gunn M, Issenberg SB, Pringle SD, Stewart A, Medical Teacher 2011 33 286 290 10.3109/0142159X.2011. 557104 21456985
34. Perceived barriers to completing an e-learning program on evidence-based medicine. Gagnon MP, Légaré F, Labrecque M, Frémont P, Cauchon M, Desmartis M, Inform Prim Care 2007 15 83 91 17877870 (Pubitemid 47249585)
35. Blended Learning in der ärztlichen Fortbildung-Evaluation eines innovativen Fortbildungszyklus Bipolare Störungen und verwandte Erkrankungen". Greil W, von Strahlendorff I, Mandl H, Nervenarzt 2011 82 895 901 10.1007/s00115-010-3123-4 20842335
36. E-Learning in medical education Guide 32-Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment. Ellaway R, Masters K, Medical Teacher 2008 30 455 473 10.1080/01421590802108331 18576185 (Pubitemid 351983065)
37. Impact of self-assessment questions and learning styles in web-based learning: a randomized, controlled, crossover trial. Cook DA, Thompson WG, Thomas KG, Thomas MR, Pankratz VS, Acad Med 2006 81 231 238 10.1097/00001888- 200603000-00005 16501263 (Pubitemid 44288878)