What are the correlates of interdisciplinary research impact? The case of corporate governance research

Academy of Management Learning and Education

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 82-98

  Judge, William Q ^a   Weber, Thomas ^a   Muller Kahle, Maureen I ^b  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859054667     PISSN: 1537260X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/amle.2010.0191     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (91)

1. Adler, N. J., & Harzing, A.-W. 2009. When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8: 72-82.
2. Allen, M. T., & Dare, W. H. 2009. Evaluating co-author contributions in real estate research. Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, 12: 33-42.
3. Antonakis, J., & Lalive, R. 2008. Quantifying scholarly impact: IQp versus the Hirsch h. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59: 956-969. (Pubitemid 351548474)
4. Argyris, C. 1996. Unrecognized defenses of scholars: Impact on theory and research. Organization Science, 7: 79-87. (Pubitemid 126416080)
5. Barbezat, D., & Hughes, J. W. 2001. The effect of job mobility on academic salaries. Contemporary Economic Policy, 19: 409-423.
6. Barnes, J. 1954. Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Human Relations, 7: 39-58.
7. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1991. Global strategic management: Impact on the new frontiers of strategy research. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 15-16.
8. Bartunek, J. 2007. Academic-practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research: Toward a relational scholarship of integration. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1323-1327.
9. Bazley, J. D., & Nikolai, L. A. 1975. The organizational set prestige ranking and its impact upon accounting department faculties. Accounting Review, 50: 881-888.
10. Bedian, A., Cavazos, D., Hunt, J. G., & Jauch, L. 2010. Doctoral degree prestige and the academic marketplace: A study of career mobility within the management discipline. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9: 11-25.
11. Belliveau, M. 2005. Blind ambition? The effects of social networks and institutional sex composition on the job search outcomes of elite coeducational and women's college graduates. Organization Science, 16: 134-150. (Pubitemid 40707295)
12. Bergh, D. H., Perry, J., & Hanke, R. 2006. Some predictors of SMJ article impact. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 81-100. (Pubitemid 43011607)
13. Boyd, B., Finkelstein, S., & Gove, S. 2005. How advanced is the strategy paradigm? The role of particularism and universalism in shaping research outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 841-854. (Pubitemid 41146003)
14. Brown, L. D., & Gardner, J. C. 1985. Applying citation analysis to evaluate the research contributions of accounting faculty and doctoral programs. Accounting Review, 60: 262.
15. Bruce, A., Lyall, C., Tait, J., & Williams, R. 2004. Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: The case of the fifth framework programme. Futures, 36: 457-477.
16. Burris, V. 2004. The academic caste system: Prestige hierarchies in PhD exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 69: 239-264. (Pubitemid 38727985)
17. Burt, R. S. 1982. Toward a structural theory of action: Network models of social structure, perception, and action. New York: Academic Press.
18. Cantwell, J., & Brannen, M. J. 2011. Positioning JIBS as an interdisciplinary journal. Journal of International Business Studies, 42: 1-9.
19. Carillo, M., Papagni, E., & Capitanio, F. 2008. Effects of social interactions on scientists' productivity. International Journal of Manpower, 29: 263-279.
20. Carpenter, M. A. 2009. An executive's primer on the strategy of social networks. New York: Business Expert Press.
21. Carter, C., Ellram, L., & Tate, W. 2007. The use of social network analysis in logistics research. Journal of Business Logistics, 28: 137-170.
22. Chan, K. C., Chen, C. R., & Fung, H. 2009. Pedigree or placement? The research productivity in finance. Financial Review, 44: 87-111.
23. Chan, K. C., Chen, C. R., & Steiner, T. L. 2004. Who is publishing? An analysis of finance research productivity in the European region. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 31: 401-437. (Pubitemid 38727587)
24. Chen, Y., Gupta, A., & Hoshower, L. 2006. Factors that motivate business faculty to conduct research: An expectancy theory analysis. Journal of Education for Business, 81: 179-189.
25. Cheng, J., Henisz, W., Roth, K., & Swaminathan, A. 2009. Advancing interdisciplinary research in the field of international business: Prospects, issues and challenges. Journal of International Business Studies, 40: 1070-1074.
26. Chermack, T., & Lynham, S. A. 2002. Assessing institutional sources of scholarly productivity in human resource development from 1995 to 2001. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13: 341-346.
27. Cole, S., & Cole, J. R. 1967. Scientific output and recognition: A study in the operation of the reward system in science. American Sociological Review, 32: 377-390.
28. Cronin, B., & Meho, L. 2006. Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57: 1275-1285.
29. Daft, R., Griffin, R., & Yates, V. 1987. Retrospective accounts of research factors associated with significant and not-sosignificant research outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 30: 763-785.
30. Dao, M. Q. 2004. Rural poverty in developing countries: An empirical analysis. Journal of Economic Studies, 31: 500-520.
31. Davis, J., Huston, J., & Patterson, D. 2001. The scholarly output of economists: A description of publishing patterns. Atlantic Economic Journal, 29: 341-349.
32. Diamantopoulos, A. 1996. A model of publication performance of marketing academics. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13: 163-180. (Pubitemid 126164163)
33. Fleming, L., King, C., & Juda, A. 2007. Small worlds and regional innovation. Organization Science, 18: 938-956.
34. Fogarty, T., & Ruhl, J. 1997. Institutional antecedents of accounting faculty research productivity: A LISREL study of the "best and brightest." Issues in Accounting Education, 12: 27-48.
35. Fox, K. J., & Milbourne, R. 1999. What determines research output of academic economists? Economic Record, 75: 256-267. (Pubitemid 30107067)
36. Friedman, R., Kane, M., & Cornfield, D. 1998. Social support and career optimism: Examining the effectiveness of network groups among black managers. Human Relations, 51: 1155-1178. (Pubitemid 128130390)
37. Gallivan, M. J., & Benbunan-Fich, R. 2007. Analyzing IS research productivity: An inclusive approach to global IS scholarship. European Journal of Information Systems, 16: 36-53.
38. Garfield, E. 1977. The 250 most-cited primary authors, 1961-1975. part 3. Each author's most-cited publication. Current Contents, 51: 5-20.
39. Goodwin, T., & Sauer, R. 1995. Life cycle productivity in academic research: Evidence from cumulative publication histories of academic economists. Southern Economic Journal, 61: 728-743.
40. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Balkin, D. B. 1992. The determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 921-955.
41. Graffy, E. 2008. Meeting the challenges of policy-relevant science: Bridging theory and practice. Public Administration Review, 68: 1087-1103.
42. Greve, A., & Salaff, J. 2003. Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 28: 1-20.
43. Hammermesh, D., & Oster, S. 2002. Tools or toys? The impact of high technology on scholarly productivity. Economic Inquiry, 40: 539-555.
44. Heck, J., & Zaleski, P. 1991. Trends in economic-journal literature: 1969-89. Atlantic Economic Journal, 19: 27-32.
45. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. 2004. Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
46. Hsieh, P., & Chang, P. 2009. As assessment of world-wide research productivity in production and operations management. International Journal of Production Economics, 120: 540-555.
47. Hu, Q., & Gill, T. G. 2000. IS faculty research productivity: Influential factors and implication. Information Resources Management Journal, 13: 15-25.
48. Jacobs, J., & Frickel, S. 2009. Interdisciplinarity: A critical assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 35: 43-65.
49. Jarley, P., Chandler, T., & Faulk, L. 1998. Are we playing the same game? Publishing task environments and research productivity among management specialists. Human Relations, 51: 799-824.
50. Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., Colbert, A. E., & Rynes, S. L. 2007. What causes a management article to be cited-Article, author or journal? Academy of Management Journal, 50: 491-506.
51. Judge, W. Q. 2009. The complexity of international corporate governance research. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17: 525.
52. Judge, W. Q., Filatotchev, I., & Aguilera, R. 2010. Comparative corporate governance and international business research. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18: 493-495.
53. Labianca, G., & Brass, D. 2006. Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 31: 596-616.
54. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33: 158-174.
55. Leahey, E. 2007. Not by productivity alone: How visibility and specialization contribute to academic earnings. American Sociological Review, 72: 533-561. (Pubitemid 47288903)
56. Lee, A. 1999. Rigor and relevance in MIS research: Beyond the approach of positivism alone. MIS Quarterly, 23: 29-34.
57. Lin, M., & Bozeman, B. 2006. Researchers' industry experience and productivity in university-industry research centers: A "scientific and technical human capital" explanation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31: 269-290. (Pubitemid 43150157)
58. Lorsch, J. 2009. Regaining lost relevance. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18: 108-114.
59. Manning, L. M., & Barrette, J. 2005. Research performance management in academe. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 22: 273-287. (Pubitemid 43706490)
60. Marsh, S. J., & Hunt, C. S. 2006. Not quite as simple as A-B-C: Reflections on one department's experiences with publication ranking. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15: 301-315. (Pubitemid 44221878)
61. Maske, K., Durden, G., & Gaynor, P. 2003. Determinants of scholarly productivity among male and female economists. Economic Inquiry, 41: 555-564. (Pubitemid 37347074)
62. Mathieu, R., & McConomy, B. J. 2003. Productivity in "top-ten" academic accounting journals by researchers at Canadian universities. Canadian Accounting Perspectives, 2: 43-76. (Pubitemid 38726517)
63. McDowell, J. M., & Smith, J. K. 1992. The effect of gender-sorting on propensity to coauthor: Implications for academic promotion. Economic Inquiry, 30: 68-82.
64. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Van Fleet, D. 2005. Scholarly journals as producers of knowledge: Theory and empirical evidence based on data envelopment analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 8: 185-201. (Pubitemid 40482867)
65. Medoff, M. H. 1996. A citation-based analysis of economists and economics programs. American Economist, 40: 46-56.
66. Meho, L. I., & Sonnenwald, D. H. 2000. Citation ranking versus peer evaluation of senior faculty research performance: A case study of Kurdish scholarship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51: 123-133.
67. Meho, L., & Yang, K. 2007. Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58: 2105-2125. (Pubitemid 350229712)
68. Money, R. B. 1998. International multilateral negotiations and social networks. Journal of International Business Studies, 29: 695-711.
69. Moore, W., Newman, R., & Turnbull, G. 2001. Reputational capital and academic pay. Economic Inquiry, 39: 663-671.
70. Morrisey, M., & Cawley, J. 2007. The production of published research U.S. academic health economists. International Journal of Health Care Finance, 8: 87-111.
71. Perkman, M., & Walsh, K. 2008. Engaging the scholar: Three types of academic consulting and their impact on universities and industry. Research Policy, 37: 1884-1891.
72. Pfeffer, J., & Langton, N. 1993. The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 382-407.
73. Piotrowksi, C., Watt, J., & Armstrong, T. 2010. The interdisciplinary nature of the field of crisis management: A call for research collaboration. Organization Development Journal, 28: 87-93.
74. Polonsky, M., & Ringer, A. C. 2009. The global and regional dispersion of publishing in the field of international marketing. Journal of Global Marketing, 22: 155-172.
75. Prasad, R., & Prasad, S. B. 2009. Output versus salient impact in financial economics. Applied Financial Economics, 19: 1697-1712.
76. Ralston, D., Egri, C., de la Garza, M., Ramburuth, P. et al. 2009. Ethical preferences for influencing superiors: A 41-society study. Journal of International Business Studies, 40: 1022-1045.
77. Robinson, L. M., & Adler, R. 1981. Measuring the impact of marketing scholars and institutions: An analysis of citation frequency. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 9: 147-167.
78. Sabrin, M. 2002. A ranking of the most productive business ethics scholars: A five-year study. Journal of Business Ethics, 36: 355-379. (Pubitemid 37134072)
79. Seggie, S., & Griffith, D. 2009. What does it take to get promoted in marketing academia? Understanding exceptional publication productivity in leading marketing journals. Journal of Marketing, 73: 122-132.
80. Shanghai Jiao Tung University. 2010. Academic ranking of worldwide universities-2009. http://www.arwu.org/ARWU2009.jsp.
81. Silver, E. A. 2008. Some ideas on enhancing research productivity. International Journal of Production Economics, 118: 352-360.
82. Smith, J., Fox, G., Park, S., & Lee, L. 2008. Institutional antecedents to research productivity in operations: The U.S. perspective. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 28: 7-26.
83. Treviño, L. J., Mixon, F. G., Jr., Funk, C. A., & Inkpen, A. C. 2010. A perspective on the state of the field: International business publications in the elite journals as a measure of institutional and faculty productivity. International Business Review, 19: 378-387.
84. Truex, D., Takeda, H., & Cuellar, M. 2009. Assessing scholarly influence: Using the Hirsch indices to reframe the discourse. Journal of Association of Information Systems, 10: 560-594.
85. Williamson, I., & Cable, D. 2003. Predicating early career research productivity: The case of management faculty. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24: 25-44.
86. Woodside, A. 2009. Journal and author impact metrics: An editorial. Journal of Business Research, 62: 1-4.
87. Worrell, D. 2009. Assessing business scholarship: The difficulties in moving beyond the rigor-relevance paradigm trap. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8: 127-130.
88. Wright, B. 2011. Public administration as an interdisciplinary field: Assessing its relationship with the fields of law, management, and political science. Public Administration Review, 71: 96-101.
89. Xu, S., Yalcinkaya, G., & Seggie, S. 2008. Prolific authors and institutions in leading international business journals. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25: 189-207.
90. Yang, Z., Jaramillo, F., & Chonko, L. 2010. Productivity and coauthorship in JPSSM: A social network analysis. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, Winter: 47-71.
91. Zahra, S., & Newey, L. 2009. Maximizing the impact of organization science: Theory-building at the intersection of disciplines. Journal of Management Studies, 46: 1059-1075.